World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
127
Citations
52353
World Ranking
2857
National Ranking
290

Graham Dunn publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Graham Dunn sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 598 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Graham Dunn D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Graham Dunn sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 127 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Graham Dunn was affiliated with the University of Manchester in the United Kingdom. Their research spanned multiple disciplines, primarily focusing on medicine and mathematics, with particular emphasis on psychiatry, mental health, and statistical methodologies.

Their work covered several main topics, including:

  • Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Mental health and patient involvement
  • Mental health and psychiatry
  • Psychosomatic disorders and their treatments
  • Advanced causal inference techniques
  • Statistical methods and Bayesian inference
  • Statistical methods in clinical trials

Their publications appeared in notable venues such as:

  • PsycTESTS Dataset
  • Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice
  • Health Expectations
  • Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation
  • BMC Medical Research Methodology

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Graham Dunn included:

  • "The service user experience of SlowMo therapy: A co-produced thematic analysis of service users' subjective experience" (2022, Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice)
  • "The impact of Patient and Public Involvement in the SlowMo study: Reflections on peer innovation" (2021, Health Expectations)
  • "Digitally supported CBT to reduce paranoia and improve reasoning for people with schizophrenia-spectrum psychosis: the SlowMo RCT" (2021, Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation)
  • "The impact of moderator by confounder interactions in the assessment of treatment effect modification: a simulation study" (2022, BMC Medical Research Methodology)
  • "Measuring Reasoning in Paranoia: Development of the Fast and Slow Thinking Questionnaire" (2020, Schizophrenia Bulletin Open)

Frequent collaborators in their research included:

  • Richard Emsley
  • Daniel Freeman
  • Kathryn Greenwood
  • Thomas Ward
  • Amy Hardy

Best Publications

  • Aortic pulse-wave velocity and its relationship to mortality in diabetes and glucose intolerance: an integrated index of vascular function?

    Kennedy Cruickshank;Lisa Riste;Simon G. Anderson;John S. Wright

  • Measuring psychiatric disorder in the community: a standardized assessment for use by lay interviewers.

    Glyn Lewis;Anthony J. Pelosi;Ricardo Araya;Graham Dunn

  • Randomized Controlled Trial of the Effect on Quality of Life of Second- vs First-Generation Antipsychotic Drugs in Schizophrenia: Cost Utility of the Latest Antipsychotic Drugs in Schizophrenia Study (CUtLASS 1)

    Peter B. Jones;Thomas R. E. Barnes;Linda Davies;Graham Dunn

  • The Camberwell Assessment of Need: the validity and reliability of an instrument to assess the needs of people with severe mental illness.

    Michael Phelan;Mike Slade;Graham Thornicroft;Graham Dunn

  • A Brief Mental Health Outcome Scale-Reliability and Validity of the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF)

    Steven H. Jones;Graham Thornicroft;Michael Coffey;Graham Dunn

  • Psychological investigation of the structure of paranoia in a non-clinical population.

    Daniel Freeman;Philippa A. Garety;Paul E. Bebbington;Benjamin Smith

  • Depressive disorders in Europe: prevalence figures from the ODIN study.

    Jose Luis Ayuso-Mateos;Jose Luis Vázquez-Barquero;Christopher Dowrick;Ville Lehtinen

  • Negative life events, social support and gender difference in depression: a multinational community survey with data from the ODIN study.

    Odd Steffen Dalgard;Christopher Dowrick;Ville Lehtinen;Jose Luis Vazquez-Barquero

  • The Lambeth Early Onset (LEO) Team: randomised controlled trial of the effectiveness of specialised care for early psychosis

    Tom K J Craig;Philippa Garety;Paddy Power;Nikola Rahaman

  • The influence of age and sex on the prevalence of depressive conditions: report from the National Survey of Psychiatric Morbidity.

    P Bebbington;G Dunn;R Jenkins;G Lewis

  • The Brief Core Schema Scales (BCSS): psychometric properties and associations with paranoia and grandiosity in non-clinical and psychosis samples

    David Fowler;Daniel Freeman;Ben Smith;Elizabeth Kuipers

  • London-East Anglia randomised controlled trial of cognitive-behavioural therapy for psychosis. I: effects of the treatment phase.

    Elizabeth Kuipers;Philippa Garety;David Fowler;Graham Dunn

  • Emotion and psychosis: Links between depression, self-esteem, negative schematic beliefs and delusions and hallucinations

    Ben Smith;David G. Fowler;Daniel Freeman;Paul Bebbington

  • Randomised controlled trial of cognitive-behavioural therapy in early schizophrenia: acute-phase outcomes.

    Shôn Lewis;Nicholas Tarrier;Gillian Haddock;Richard Bentall

  • Randomized Controlled Trial of Effect of Prescription of Clozapine Versus Other Second-Generation Antipsychotic Drugs in Resistant Schizophrenia

    Shôn W. Lewis;Thomas R. E. Barnes;Linda Davies;Robin M. Murray

  • Prevalence of psychiatric disorders in young people in the care system.

    Jacinta B McCann;Anthony James;Sylvia Wilson;Graham Dunn

  • Measuring ideas of persecution and social reference: the Green et al. Paranoid Thought Scales (GPTS)

    Cel Green;D Freeman;E Kuipers;PE Bebbington

  • Design and analysis of reliability studies.

    Graham Dunn

  • Mediation and moderation of treatment effects in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions

    Richard Emsley;Graham Dunn;Ian R White

  • Early detection and intervention evaluation for people at risk of psychosis: multisite randomised controlled trial

    Anthonty P. Morrison;Paul French;Suzanne L.K. Stewart;Max Birchwood

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel Freeman
Daniel Freeman University of Oxford
Philippa Garety
Philippa Garety King's College London
David Fowler
David Fowler University of Sussex
Elizabeth Kuipers
Elizabeth Kuipers King's College London
Paul Bebbington
Paul Bebbington University College London
Martin Knapp
Martin Knapp London School of Economics and Political Science
Shôn Lewis
Shôn Lewis University of Manchester
David Challis
David Challis University of Nottingham
Linda Davies
Linda Davies University of Manchester
Richard Emsley
Richard Emsley King's College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine extends far beyond the traditional MD route. Many students are now turning to alternative pathways such as nursing, healthcare administration, nurse practitioner, and nutrition degrees to enter the healthcare field faster and with more flexibility.

For those seeking practical, patient-facing roles, consider enrolling in an lpn program no entrance exam—an excellent option if you want to start your healthcare career without the pressure of entrance testing. If you’re interested in fast-tracking your leadership path, accelerated healthcare programs offer a way to quickly earn a degree and move into management roles in clinics, hospitals, and health organizations.

Registered nurses wishing to expand their scope of practice can benefit from rn to np programs online, which provide a direct bridge to advanced practitioner credentials. Meanwhile, those interested in preventative health and wellness can pursue online degrees in nutrition to work in clinics, public health, or private practice.

These diverse online healthcare degrees support flexible learning and open the door to rewarding medical careers beyond the traditional physician route.

Best Scientists Citing Graham Dunn

Recently Published Articles