World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Earth Science 46 4158 3817 1611 1429 114 9586

Roy Haggerty publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Roy Haggerty between 1994 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Roy Haggerty published across 31 years, from 1994 to 2024, averaging 4.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2011. 4 of the 135 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2011. 1994: 3 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 12 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 1 publication 2023: 0 publications 2024: 4 publications
1994 2024

135 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Roy Haggerty: publications per year, 1994 to 2024
Year Publications
1994 3
1995 1
1996 1
1997 0
1998 3
1999 5
2000 3
2001 4
2002 8
2003 2
2004 5
2005 4
2006 2
2007 4
2008 7
2009 3
2010 1
2011 12
2012 12
2013 12
2014 10
2015 6
2016 8
2017 6
2018 3
2019 4
2020 0
2021 1
2022 1
2023 0
2024 4
Total 135
Download as CSV

Roy Haggerty publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roy Haggerty sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 603+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 557. Most scientists, 557, have 128–137 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 108–117 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 603+

This scientist: 114 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 5
48–57 33
58–67 94
68–77 161
78–87 278
88–97 376
98–107 404
108–117 484 114
118–127 540
128–137 557
138–147 491
148–157 495
158–167 458
168–177 490
178–187 414
188–197 401
198–207 333
208–217 292
218–227 290
228–237 262
238–247 243
248–257 208
258–267 185
268–277 147
278–287 128
288–297 119
298–307 120
308–317 107
318–327 93
328–337 87
338–347 64
348–357 87
358–367 60
368–377 60
378–387 34
388–397 50
398–407 44
408–417 31
418–427 39
428–437 27
438–447 36
448–457 27
458–467 29
468–477 30
478–487 19
488–497 15
498–507 18
508–517 19
518–527 16
528–537 10
538–547 11
548–557 14
558–567 11
568–577 7
578–587 14
588–597 5
598–602 4
603+ 100
Download as CSV

Roy Haggerty D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roy Haggerty sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 77 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 106+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 389. Most scientists, 389, have 36 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 144
31 215
32 278
33 379
34 366
35 372
36 389
37 366
38 344
39 349
40 296
41 289
42 277
43 279
44 248
45 257
46 212 46
47 202
48 207
49 204
50 183
51 178
52 182
53 178
54 163
55 117
56 163
57 120
58 113
59 136
60 135
61 96
62 103
63 83
64 103
65 83
66 89
67 92
68 89
69 78
70 75
71 53
72 62
73 54
74 35
75 52
76 50
77 32
78 37
79 20
80 33
81 36
82 34
83 34
84 24
85 19
86 18
87 26
88 30
89 17
90 21
91 19
92 15
93 14
94 20
95 9
96 10
97 15
98 13
99 3
100 13
101 3
102 9
103 4
104 6
105 6
106+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Roy Haggerty is affiliated with Oregon State University in the United States. Their research spans environmental science and medicine, with a focus on several subfields including infectious diseases, environmental chemistry, ecology, biomedical engineering, and water science and technology.

Their work covers multiple topics related to soil and water nutrient dynamics, SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing, COVID-19 research, biosensors and analytical detection, hydrology and watershed management studies, hydrology and sediment transport processes, as well as wastewater treatment and nitrogen removal.

Recent publications by Roy Haggerty include:

  • Evaluation of a Wastewater-Based Epidemiological Approach to Estimate the Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Infections and the Detection of Viral Variants in Disparate Oregon Communities at City and Neighborhood Scales (2022), Environmental Health Perspectives
  • Hydrologic connectivity and dynamics of solute transport in a mountain stream: Insights from a long-term tracer test and multiscale transport modeling informed by machine learning (2024), Journal of Hydrology
  • Buried particulate organic C fuels heterotrophic metabolism in the hyporheic zone of a montane headwater stream (2024), Freshwater Science
  • Representative Public Health Surveys Pose Several Challenges: Lessons Learned Across 9 Communities During the COVID-19 Pandemic (2024), AJPM Focus
  • Simulating Long-Term Dynamics of Solute Transport in a Mountainous Stream Network Using a Multiscale Transport Model Informed by Machine Learning (2024), SSRN Electronic Journal

Frequent coauthors in their research include:

  • Jeffrey W. Bethel
  • Benjamin D. Dalziel
  • Kathryn A. Higley
  • Jane Lubchenco
  • Katherine McLaughlin

Roy Haggerty's research has been published in venues such as Environmental Health Perspectives, Journal of Hydrology, Freshwater Science, AJPM Focus, and SSRN Electronic Journal.

Best Publications

  • Multiple‐Rate Mass Transfer for Modeling Diffusion and Surface Reactions in Media with Pore‐Scale Heterogeneity

    Roy Haggerty;Steven M. Gorelick

  • Moving beyond heterogeneity and process complexity: A new vision for watershed hydrology

    J J McDonnell;J J McDonnell;M Sivapalan;K Vache;S Dunn

  • On the late‐time behavior of tracer test breakthrough curves

    Roy Haggerty;Sean A. McKenna;Lucy C. Meigs

  • Dynamics of nitrate production and removal as a function of residence time in the hyporheic zone

    Jay P. Zarnetske;Roy D. Haggerty;Steven M. Wondzell;Michelle A. Baker

  • Power-law residence time distribution in the hyporheic zone of a 2nd-order mountain stream

    Roy Haggerty;Steven M. Wondzell;Matthew A. Johnson

  • Coupled transport and reaction kinetics control the nitrate source-sink function of hyporheic zones

    Jay P. Zarnetske;Roy Haggerty;Steven M. Wondzell;Vrushali A. Bokil

  • Tracer tests in a fractured dolomite: 2. Analysis of mass transfer in single‐well injection‐withdrawal tests

    Roy Haggerty;Sean W. Fleming;Lucy C. Meigs;Sean A. McKenna

  • A modelling study of hyporheic exchange pattern and the sequence, size, and spacing of stream bedforms in mountain stream networks, Oregon, USA

    Michael N. Gooseff;Justin K. Anderson;Steven M. Wondzell;Justin LaNier

  • Simplified Method of “Push‐Pull” Test Data Analysis for Determining In Situ Reaction Rate Coefficients

    R. Haggerty;M.H. Schroth;J.D. Istok

  • Comparing transient storage modeling and residence time distribution (RTD) analysis in geomorphically varied reaches in the Lookout Creek basin, Oregon, USA

    Michael N. Gooseff;Steve M. Wondzell;Roy Haggerty;Justin Anderson

  • What controls the apparent timescale of solute mass transfer in aquifers and soils? A comparison of experimental results

    Roy Haggerty;Charles F. Harvey;Claudius Freiherr von Schwerin;Lucy C. Meigs

  • Labile dissolved organic carbon supply limits hyporheic denitrification

    Jay P. Zarnetske;Jay P. Zarnetske;Roy D. Haggerty;Steven M. Wondzell;Michelle A. Baker

  • Influence of hyporheic flow and geomorphology on temperature of a large, gravel-bed river, Clackamas River, Oregon, USA

    Barbara K. Burkholder;Gordon E. Grant;Roy Haggerty;Tarang P. Khangaonkar

  • Residence time of bedform-driven hyporheic exchange

    M. Bayani Cardenas;John L. Wilson;Roy Haggerty

  • Patterns in stream longitudinal profiles and implications for hyporheic exchange flow at the H.J. Andrews Experimental Forest, Oregon, USA

    Justin K. Anderson;Justin K. Anderson;Steven M. Wondzell;Michael N. Gooseff;Roy Haggerty

  • The paradox of cooling streams in a warming world: Regional climate trends do not parallel variable local trends in stream temperature in the Pacific continental United States

    Ivan Arismendi;Sherri L. Johnson;Jason B. Dunham;Roy Haggerty

  • Measuring aerobic respiration in stream ecosystems using the resazurin‐resorufin system

    Ricardo González-Pinzón;Roy Haggerty;David D. Myrold

  • Determining in‐channel (dead zone) transient storage by comparing solute transport in a bedrock channel–alluvial channel sequence, Oregon

    Michael N. Gooseff;Justin LaNier;Roy Haggerty;Kenneth Kokkeler;Kenneth Kokkeler

  • Experimental visualization of solute transport and mass transfer processes in two-dimensional conductivity fields with connected regions of high conductivity.

    Brendan Zinn;Lucy C. Meigs;Charles F. Harvey;Roy Haggerty

  • Development of a smart tracer for the assessment of microbiological activity and sediment-water interaction in natural waters: The resazurin-resorufin system

    Roy Haggerty;Alba Argerich;Eugènia Martí

  • Modeling Mass Transfer Processes in Soil Columns with Pore-Scale Heterogeneity

    Roy Haggerty;Steven M. Gorelick

  • Tracer Tests in a Fractured Dolomite: 3. Analysis of Mass Transfer in Single-Well Injection-Withdrawal Tests

    R. Haggerty;S.W. Fleming;L.C. Meigs;S.A. McKenna

Frequent Co-Authors

Steven M. Wondzell
Steven M. Wondzell US Forest Service
Kamini Singha
Kamini Singha Colorado School of Mines
Michael N. Gooseff
Michael N. Gooseff University of Colorado Boulder
Andrew Binley
Andrew Binley Lancaster University
Eugènia Martí
Eugènia Martí Spanish National Research Council
Frederick D. Day-Lewis
Frederick D. Day-Lewis United States Geological Survey
Steven M. Gorelick
Steven M. Gorelick Stanford University
Olaf A. Cirpka
Olaf A. Cirpka University of Tübingen
Jonathan D. Istok
Jonathan D. Istok Oregon State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring higher education options that complement or branch from Earth Science can broaden your career trajectory. Many students turn to versatile online programs that fit diverse needs and backgrounds. For veterans interested in language skills to enhance global fieldwork or communication, online Spanish degree programs for veterans offer specialized courses respecting military schedules and experience.

Creative professionals may find that combining Earth Science with environmental art or communication leads to unique opportunities. Pursuing an online MFA allows for flexible learning while developing artistic skills that support science outreach and advocacy.

Additionally, leadership roles in environmental agencies demand strong people management skills. An online masters degree in human resource management can equip professionals with essential tools to lead teams effectively within scientific organizations.

For older adults seeking to pivot or advance their careers, exploring the best degrees for older adults highlights accessible programs that value experience while offering flexibility and support tailored to mature learners.

Best Scientists Citing Roy Haggerty

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles