World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
91
Citations
28843
World Ranking
11809
National Ranking
6053

Ola A. Selnes publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ola A. Selnes sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 231 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Ola A. Selnes D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ola A. Selnes sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 91 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ola A. Selnes is affiliated with Johns Hopkins University in the United States. Their research contributions include analyses related to cognitive change and epidemiological factors over extended periods.

One notable publication authored by Selnes is titled Impact of Differential Attrition on the Association of Education With Cognitive Change Over 20 Years of Follow-up: The ARIC Neurocognitive Study. This paper was published in 2020 at UNC Libraries.

Selnes has collaborated frequently with several researchers across related fields. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Rebecca F. Gottesman
  • Andreea M. Rawlings
  • A. Richey Sharrett
  • Marilyn Albert
  • Álvaro Alonso

In terms of publication venues, their work has appeared notably in:

  • UNC Libraries

Best Publications

  • 2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery

    L. David Hillis;Peter K. Smith;Jeffrey L. Anderson;John A. Bittl

  • 2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines

    L. David Hillis;Peter K. Smith;John A. Bittl;Charles R. Bridges

  • Dementia in AIDS patients: Incidence and risk factors

    J. C. McArthur;D. R. Hoover;H. Bacellar;E. N. Miller

  • 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: Executive summary: A report of the american college of cardiology foundation/American heart association task force on practice guidelines

    L. David Hillis;Peter K. Smith;Jeffrey L. Anderson;John A. Bittl

  • HIV-associated neurologic disease incidence changes: Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study, 1990–1998

    N. Sacktor;R.H. Lyles;R. Skolasky;C. Kleeberger

  • HIV-associated cognitive impairment before and after the advent of combination therapy

    Ned Sacktor;Ned Sacktor;Michael P. McDermott;Karen Marder;Giovanni Schifitto

  • Nomenclature and research case definitions for neurologic manifestations of human immunodeficiency virus-type 1 (HIV-1) infection

    Robert S. Janssen;David R. Cornblath;Leon G. Epstein;Richard P. Foa

  • Higher frequency of dementia in older HIV-1 individuals: The Hawaii Aging with HIV-1 Cohort

    Victor Valcour;C. Shikuma;B. Shiramizu;M. Watters

  • The International HIV Dementia Scale: a new rapid screening test for HIV dementia.

    Ned C. Sacktor;Matthew Wong;Noeline Nakasujja;Richard L. Skolasky

  • HIV Dementia Scale: a rapid screening test.

    Christopher Power;Ola A. Selnes;Julie A. Grim;Justin C. McArthur

  • Neuropsychological performance in HIV‐1‐infected homosexual men The Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study (MACS)*

    Eric N. Miller;O. A. Selnes;J. C. McArthur;P. Satz

  • Stroke and Encephalopathy After Cardiac Surgery An Update

    Guy M. McKhann;Maura A. Grega;Louis M. Borowicz;William A. Baumgartner

  • Cognitive and Neurologic Outcomes After Coronary-Artery Bypass Surgery

    Ola A. Selnes;Rebecca F. Gottesman;Maura A. Grega;William A. Baumgartner

  • Clinical‐neuropathologic correlation in HIV‐associated dementia

    Jonathan D. Glass;Steven L. Wesselingh;Ola A. Selnes;Justin C. McArthur

  • Temporal trends in the incidence of HIV-1-related neurologic diseases: Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study, 1985-1992.

    H. Bacellar;A. Muñoz;E. N. Miller;Bruce Arnold Cohen

  • Plasma viral load and CD4 lymphocytes predict HIV-associated dementia and sensory neuropathy

    E. A. Childs;R. H. Lyles;O. A. Selnes;B. Chen

  • Low prevalence of neurological and neuropsychological abnormalities in otherwise healthy HIV-1-infected individuals: results from the multicenter AIDS Cohort Study.

    Justin C. McArthur;Bruce Arnold Cohen;Ola A. Selnes;Ashok J. Kumar

  • 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: Executive summary

    L. David Hillis;Peter K. Smith;Jeffrey L. Anderson;John A. Bittl

  • HIV-1 infection: no evidence of cognitive decline during the asymptomatic stages

    O. A. Selnes;E. Miller;J. McArthur;B. Gordon

  • ACCF/AHA Practice Guideline 2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Executive Summary A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines

    L. David Hillis;Peter K. Smith

Frequent Co-Authors

Justin C. McArthur
Justin C. McArthur Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Guy M. McKhann
Guy M. McKhann Johns Hopkins University
James T. Becker
James T. Becker University of Pittsburgh
Bruce Cohen
Bruce Cohen Northwestern University
Rebecca F. Gottesman
Rebecca F. Gottesman Johns Hopkins University
William A. Baumgartner
William A. Baumgartner Johns Hopkins University
David M. Shahian
David M. Shahian Harvard University
Manesh R. Patel
Manesh R. Patel Duke University
Barry Gordon
Barry Gordon Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Argye E. Hillis
Argye E. Hillis Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in expanding your career opportunities within healthcare, there are a variety of online degree programs related to medicine in the USA. Whether your goal is to advance patient care skills or move into leadership, it’s important to carefully consider all options.

First, understand how to evaluate healthcare administration degree programs. Accreditation, curriculum quality, and career support are essential factors for anyone considering healthcare management.

For registered nurses, an efficient way to boost qualifications is through RN to BSN pathways. If you’re seeking flexibility, you can explore rn to bsn online no clinicals accredited programs that reduce hands-on requirements while maintaining academic rigor.

Those aiming for the highest level in nursing practice may want to consider the fastest online dnp programs to expediently achieve advanced credentials. Additionally, if balancing study with other responsibilities is a priority, review the easiest dnp program online options that still meet accreditation and quality standards.

With these pathways, aspiring healthcare professionals have more flexibility and choice than ever before.

Best Scientists Citing Ola A. Selnes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles