World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
80
Citations
22013
World Ranking
17176
National Ranking
1554

Stephen A Roberts publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen A Roberts sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 345 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Stephen A Roberts D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen A Roberts sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1962 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Stephen A Roberts is affiliated with the University of Manchester in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily falls under the broad domain of medicine, encompassing various specialized fields including surgery, transplantation, nephrology, pediatrics, perinatology, child health, and epidemiology.

The scientist has contributed notably to several topics within clinical and biomedical research. Key areas of work include:

  • Anesthesia and Pain Management
  • Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
  • Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
  • Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research
  • Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
  • Intraocular Surgery and Lenses

Stephen A Roberts has published extensively in medical journals, with frequent appearances in the following publication venues:

  • Nature Communications
  • Anaesthesia
  • Med
  • Transplantation Direct
  • Anaesthesia & Intensive Care Medicine

Among recent notable papers by Roberts are:

  • "Next-Generation Morphometry for pathomics-data mining in histopathology" (2023) published in Nature Communications
  • "Urine Recirculation Improves Hemodynamics and Enhances Function in Normothermic Kidney Perfusion" (2020) published in Transplantation Direct
  • "Prolonged normothermic perfusion of the kidney prior to transplantation: a historically controlled, phase 1 cohort study" (2025) published in Nature Communications
  • "New blocks on the kids: core basic nerve blocks in paediatric anaesthesia" (2022) published in Anaesthesia
  • "Regulatory T cell therapy is associated with distinct immune regulatory lymphocytic infiltrates in kidney transplants" (2024) published in Med

Throughout their career, Roberts has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Peter J. Friend
  • James Hunter
  • Daniel Voyce
  • Annemarie Weißenbacher
  • Rutger J. Ploeg

Stephen A Roberts was recognized as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1962.

Best Publications

  • Effects of Testosterone on Muscle Strength, Physical Function, Body Composition, and Quality of Life in Intermediate-Frail and Frail Elderly Men: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study

    Upendram Srinivas-Shankar;Stephen A. Roberts;Martin J. Connolly;Matthew D. L. O'Connell

  • Dose-Fractionation Sensitivity of Prostate Cancer Deduced From Radiotherapy Outcomes of 5,969 Patients in Seven International Institutional Datasets: α/β = 1.4 (0.9–2.2) Gy

    Raymond Miralbell;Stephen A. Roberts;Eduardo Zubizarreta;Jolyon H. Hendry

  • Identification of viable embryos in IVF by non-invasive measurement of amino acid turnover

    Daniel R. Brison;F. D. Houghton;D. Falconer;S. A. Roberts

  • Evaluation of a new binary system of grading oral epithelial dysplasia for prediction of malignant transformation

    Omar Kujan;Richard J. Oliver;Ammar Khattab;Stephen A. Roberts

  • Glucose transporter glut-1 expression correlates with tumor hypoxia and predicts metastasis-free survival in advanced carcinoma of the cervix.

    R Airley;Juliette A Loncaster;Susan E Davidson;Michael Bromley

  • The effect of age and menstrual cycle upon proliferative activity of the normal human breast.

    Christopher S Potten;R J Watson;G T Williams;S Tickle

  • Vitamin D status and muscle function in post-menarchal adolescent girls

    Kate A. Ward;Geeta Das;Jacqueline L. Berry;Stephen A. Roberts

  • Future acceptance of adolescent human papillomavirus vaccination: A survey of parental attitudes

    Loretta Brabin;Stephen A. Roberts;Farah Farzaneh;Henry C. Kitchener

  • Anti-PLA2R antibodies measured by ELISA predict long-term outcome in a prevalent population of patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy

    Durga Kanigicherla;Jennet Gummadova;Edward A. McKenzie;Stephen A. Roberts

  • Spermatogonial apoptosis has three morphologically recognizable phases and shows no circadian rhythm during normal spermatogenesis in the rat

    D J Allan;B Harmon;Stephen A Roberts

  • Two-Week Dietary Soy Supplementation Has an Estrogenic Effect on Normal Premenopausal Breast

    Danielle F. Hargreaves;Christopher S. Potten;Claudia Harding;Lesley E. Shaw

  • Circulating basal anti-Müllerian hormone levels as predictor of ovarian response in women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization.

    Luciano G. Nardo;Tarek A. Gelbaya;Hannah Wilkinson;Stephen A. Roberts

  • Design and analysis of clinical trials with clustering effects due to treatment.

    Chris Roberts;Stephen A Roberts

  • Resolution of peanut allergy: case-control study.

    Jonathan O’B Hourihane;Stephen A Roberts;John O Warner

  • Effects of soy-protein supplementation on epithelial proliferation in the histologically normal human breast.

    Danielle F. McMichael-Phillips;Claudia Harding;Mike Morton;Stephen A. Roberts

  • Heritability of Cellular Radiosensitivity: A Marker of Low-Penetrance Predisposition Genes in Breast Cancer?

    Stephen A Roberts;A. R. Spreadborough;B. Bulman;J. B P Barber

  • Uptake of first two doses of human papillomavirus vaccine by adolescent schoolgirls in Manchester: prospective cohort study

    Loretta Brabin;Stephen A Roberts;Rebecca Stretch;David Baxter

  • Why oral histopathology suffers inter-observer variability on grading oral epithelial dysplasia: an attempt to understand the sources of variation.

    Omar Kujan;Ammar Khattab;Richard J. Oliver;Stephen A. Roberts

  • Elective single embryo transfer: guidelines for practice British Fertility Society and Association of Clinical Embryologists

    Rachel Cutting;Dave Morroll;Stephen A Roberts;Susan Pickering

  • Radiation-induced micronucleus induction in lymphocytes identifies a high frequency of radiosensitive cases among breast cancer patients: A test for predisposition?

    David Scott;J B Barber;Edward Levine;W Burrill

Frequent Co-Authors

William G. Newman
William G. Newman University of Manchester
Christopher S Potten
Christopher S Potten Allegheny General Hospital
Catharine M L West
Catharine M L West University of Manchester
Judith E. Adams
Judith E. Adams University of Manchester
Henry C Kitchener
Henry C Kitchener University of Manchester
Anthony Howell
Anthony Howell University of Manchester
David Scott
David Scott Ascension Health
Paul N. Bishop
Paul N. Bishop University of Manchester
D. Gareth Evans
D. Gareth Evans University of Manchester
Frederick C. W. Wu
Frederick C. W. Wu University of Manchester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're considering a career in Medicine but want more flexibility or alternative entry points, there are several online educational pathways to explore. For those with a non-nursing background who wish to enter the nursing field quickly, direct entry msn programs offer streamlined curricula to fast-track your path toward advanced nursing roles.

Prospective nurses seeking less competitive admission processes may want to look at nursing schools with high acceptance rates. These programs can be ideal for applicants who are searching for a more accessible route into nursing education.

Alternatively, if working behind the scenes in healthcare administration is appealing, accredited online programs can help you get started. Consider schools dedicated to medical billing and coding schools with financial aid to help manage costs while building practical skills.

Finally, some prospective nurses seek out nursing schools that don't require teas exams. Skipping these entrance tests can simplify the application process, making nursing careers even more attainable.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen A Roberts

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles