World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
81
Citations
29764
World Ranking
16472
National Ranking
8278

Jack F. Fowler publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jack F. Fowler sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 434 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Jack F. Fowler D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jack F. Fowler sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jack F. Fowler is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States. The affiliation suggests an active role within a leading academic institution, likely contributing to research and academic development in their field.

There is no available data on recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, book publications, fields of study, subfields, main topics, or awards that provide further detail on their research output or collaborative network.

The absence of specific information regarding publications or research topics indicates limited publicly available bibliometric data or a focus that has not been documented in the source provided. Without additional details on published work or research specialties, it is not possible to characterize the scientist's academic contributions beyond institutional affiliation.

Best Publications

  • The linear-quadratic formula and progress in fractionated radiotherapy

    John F. Fowler

  • Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Inoperable Early Stage Lung Cancer

    Robert Timmerman;Rebecca Paulus;James Galvin;Jeffrey Michalski

  • Is α/β for prostate tumors really low?

    Jack Fowler;Rick Chappell;Mark Ritter

  • 21 years of Biologically Effective Dose

    J F Fowler

  • Loss of local control with prolongation in radiotherapy

    John F. Fowler;Mary J. Lindstrom

  • Image guidance for precise conformal radiotherapy

    Thomas Rockwell Mackie;Jeff Kapatoes;Ken Ruchala;Weiguo Lu

  • Stereotactic hypofractionated accurate radiotherapy of the prostate (SHARP), 33.5 Gy in five fractions for localized disease: First clinical trial results

    Berit L. Madsen;R. Alex Hsi;Huong T. Pham;Jack F. Fowler

  • The radiobiology of prostate cancer including new aspects of fractionated radiotherapy

    Jack F Fowler

  • What hypofractionated protocols should be tested for prostate cancer

    Jack F Fowler;Mark A Ritter;Rick J Chappell;David J Brenner

  • THE ADVERSE EFFECT OF TREATMENT PROLONGATION IN CERVICAL CARCINOMA

    Daniel G. Petereit;Jann N. Sarkaria;Richard Chappell;John F. Fowler

  • A challenge to traditional radiation oncology.

    Jack F. Fowler;Wolfgang A. Tomé;John D. Fenwick;Minesh P. Mehta

  • A new approach to dose escalation in non-small-cell lung cancer.

    Minesh Mehta;Rufus Scrimger;Rock Mackie;Bhudatt Paliwal

  • A Prospective Phase III Randomized Trial of Hypofractionation Versus Conventional Fractionation in Patients With High-Risk Prostate Cancer

    Giorgio Arcangeli;Biancamaria Saracino;Sara Gomellini;Maria Grazia Petrongari

  • Reirradiation human spinal cord tolerance for stereotactic body radiotherapy.

    Arjun Sahgal;Lijun Ma;Vivian Weinberg;Iris C. Gibbs

  • Loss of biological effect in prolonged fraction delivery

    Jack F Fowler;James S Welsh;Steven P Howard

  • Hypofractionated Versus Conventionally Fractionated Radiotherapy for Prostate Carcinoma: Final Results of Phase III Randomized Trial

    Eric E. Yeoh;Rochelle J. Botten;Julie Butters;Addolorata C. Di Matteo

  • Brief summary of radiobiological principles in fractionated radiotherapy

    Jack F. Fowler

  • Feasibility study of helical tomotherapy for total body or total marrow irradiation.

    Susanta K. Hui;Jeff M. Kapatoes;Jack Fowler;Douglass L. Henderson

  • A simple analytic derivation suggests that prostate cancer α/β ratio is low

    Christopher R. King;Jack F. Fowler

  • Spinal cord tolerance for stereotactic body radiotherapy.

    Arjun Sahgal;Lijun Ma;Iris Gibbs;Peter C. Gerszten

Frequent Co-Authors

Timothy J. Kinsella
Timothy J. Kinsella Brown University
Rick Chappell
Rick Chappell University of Wisconsin–Madison
Minesh P. Mehta
Minesh P. Mehta University of Maryland, Baltimore
Paul M. Harari
Paul M. Harari University of Wisconsin–Madison
Arjun Sahgal
Arjun Sahgal Sunnybrook Health Science Centre
David A. Larson
David A. Larson University of California, San Francisco
Jeff M. Michalski
Jeff M. Michalski Washington University in St. Louis
Philippe Lambin
Philippe Lambin Maastricht University
Ramaswamy Govindan
Ramaswamy Govindan Washington University in St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in medicine opens many alternative educational routes and specialties beyond a traditional MD program. Online learning now offers flexible options for students and working professionals seeking health-related degrees.

Those interested in hospital or clinic leadership might consider cheapest mha programs online healthcare for an affordable way to earn a Master’s in Healthcare Administration. Nurses eager to expand clinical skills and qualify for advanced positions can choose from some of the best online bsn to dnp programs.

If your interest lies in pharmacy, there are accredited online pharm d programs that allow you to earn a Doctor of Pharmacy with greater flexibility. Additionally, managing medical data is an in-demand field; rhit programs online are a smart path for gaining expertise in health information management.

These online degrees offer more accessibility and can help you quickly advance your career, gain specialized skills, or enter new areas of the healthcare industry.

Best Scientists Citing Jack F. Fowler

Recently Published Articles