World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 94 10312 9678 991 946 404 42141

Henry C Kitchener publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Henry C Kitchener between 1982 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Henry C Kitchener published across 44 years, from 1982 to 2025, averaging 9.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 37 publications in 2014. 3 of the 432 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 37. Peak 37 publications in 2014. 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 1 publication 1988: 3 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 10 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 10 publications 2000: 13 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 12 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 15 publications 2006: 22 publications 2007: 16 publications 2008: 17 publications 2009: 26 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 24 publications 2012: 21 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 37 publications 2015: 27 publications 2016: 27 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 14 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 2 publications
1982 2025

432 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Henry C Kitchener: publications per year, 1982 to 2025
Year Publications
1982 1
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 1
1987 1
1988 3
1989 0
1990 2
1991 2
1992 5
1993 3
1994 3
1995 7
1996 6
1997 10
1998 3
1999 10
2000 13
2001 7
2002 11
2003 12
2004 10
2005 15
2006 22
2007 16
2008 17
2009 26
2010 14
2011 24
2012 21
2013 10
2014 37
2015 27
2016 27
2017 12
2018 7
2019 13
2020 6
2021 9
2022 2
2023 14
2024 1
2025 2
Total 432
Download as CSV

Henry C Kitchener publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Henry C Kitchener sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 401–420 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 404 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918 404
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Henry C Kitchener D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Henry C Kitchener sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 94–95 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 94 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808 94
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom

Overview

Henry C Kitchener is affiliated with the University of Manchester in the United Kingdom. Their research is primarily situated within the field of Medicine, with a focus on several subfields including Epidemiology, Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oncology, and Reproductive Medicine.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics mainly related to cancer treatments and screening, particularly concerning endometrial and cervical cancers. The main topics of their scientific output include:

  • Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
  • Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Genital Health and Disease
  • Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
  • Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Management of metastatic bone disease
  • Genetic factors in colorectal cancer

Key recent publications by Henry C Kitchener reflect this focus and include:

  • "Molecular Classification of the PORTEC-3 Trial for High-Risk Endometrial Cancer: Impact on Prognosis and Benefit From Adjuvant Therapy", 2020, Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • "Extension of cervical screening intervals with primary human papillomavirus testing: observational study of English screening pilot data", 2022, BMJ
  • "Long-Term Toxicity and Health-Related Quality of Life After Adjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy or Radiation Therapy Alone for High-Risk Endometrial Cancer in the Randomized PORTEC-3 Trial", 2020, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
  • "The impact of catch-up bivalent human papillomavirus vaccination on cervical screening outcomes: an observational study from the English HPV primary screening pilot", 2022, British Journal of Cancer
  • "Age-specific outcomes from the first round of HPV screening in unvaccinated women: Observational study from the English cervical screening pilot", 2021, BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology

The scientist has collaborated frequently with other researchers, including Stephanie M. de Boer, Remi A. Nout, Linda Mileshkin, Hans W. Nijman, and Anthony Fyles.

Henry C Kitchener's work has been published repeatedly in several specialized journals and venues such as:

  • Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey
  • International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
  • BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
  • International Journal of Cancer
  • Radiotherapy and Oncology

Among recognitions, the scientist has been awarded Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom.

Best Publications

  • Efficacy of human papillomavirus (HPV)-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine against cervical infection and precancer caused by oncogenic HPV types (PATRICIA): final analysis of a double-blind, randomised study in young women.

    J. Paavonen;P. Naud;J. Salmeron;C. M. Wheeler

  • Efficacy of systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (MRC ASTEC trial): a randomised study.

    H Kitchener;A M C Swart;Q Qian

  • Efficacy of HPV-based screening for prevention of invasive cervical cancer: follow-up of four European randomised controlled trials

    Guglielmo Ronco;Joakim Dillner;K Miriam Elfström;Sara Tunesi

  • Efficacy of a prophylactic adjuvanted bivalent L1 virus-like-particle vaccine against infection with human papillomavirus types 16 and 18 in young women: an interim analysis of a phase III double-blind, randomised controlled trial

    Jorma Paavonen;David Jenkins;F. Xavier Bosch;Paulo Naud

  • Primary chemotherapy versus primary surgery for newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer (CHORUS): an open-label, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial

    Sean Kehoe;Jane Hook;Matthew Nankivell;Gordon C Jayson

  • Cervical Cancer: A Global Health Crisis

    William Small;Monica A. Bacon;Amishi Bajaj;Linus T. Chuang

  • Overall efficacy of HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine against grade 3 or greater cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: 4-year end-of-study analysis of the randomised, double-blind PATRICIA trial

    Matti Lehtinen;Jorma Paavonen;Cosette M. Wheeler;Unnop Jaisamrarn

  • Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer.

    Emma J Crosbie;Mark H Einstein;Silvia Franceschi;Henry C Kitchener

  • Adjuvant external beam radiotherapy in the treatment of endometrial cancer (MRC ASTEC and NCIC CTG EN.5 randomised trials): pooled trial results, systematic review, and meta-analysis.

    Astec;P Blake;Ann Marie Swart

  • Management of women who test positive for high-risk types of human papillomavirus: The HART study

    Jack Cuzick;A Szarewski;H Cubie;G Hulman

  • Comprehensive control of human papillomavirus infections and related diseases.

    F. Xavier Bosch;Thomas R. Broker;David Forman;Anna Barbara Moscicki

  • Cross-protective efficacy of HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine against cervical infection and precancer caused by non-vaccine oncogenic HPV types: 4-year end-of-study analysis of the randomised, double-blind PATRICIA trial

    Cosette M. Wheeler;Xavier Castellsagué;Suzanne M. Garland;Anne Szarewski

  • 2004 consensus statements on the management of ovarian cancer: final document of the 3rd International Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup Ovarian Cancer Consensus Conference (GCIG OCCC 2004).

    A du Bois;M Quinn;T Thigpen;J Vermorken

  • Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for women with high-risk endometrial cancer (PORTEC-3): final results of an international, open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial

    Stephanie M. de Boer;Melanie E. Powell;Linda Mileshkin;Dionyssios Katsaros

  • Molecular Classification of the PORTEC-3 Trial for High-Risk Endometrial Cancer: Impact on Prognosis and Benefit From Adjuvant Therapy

    Alicia León-Castillo;Stephanie M. de Boer;Melanie E. Powell;Linda R. Mileshkin

  • 2010 Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG) Consensus Statement on Clinical Trials in Ovarian Cancer Report From the Fourth Ovarian Cancer Consensus Conference

    Gavin C.E. Stuart;Henry Kitchener;Monica Bacon;Andreas duBois

  • HPV testing in combination with liquid-based cytology in primary cervical screening (ARTISTIC): a randomised controlled trial

    Henry C Kitchener;Maribel Almonte;Claire Thomson;Paula Wheeler

  • Refining prognosis and identifying targetable pathways for high-risk endometrial cancer; a TransPORTEC initiative.

    Ellen Stelloo;Tjalling Bosse;Remi A Nout;Helen J MacKay

  • Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in women with high-risk endometrial cancer (PORTEC-3): patterns of recurrence and post-hoc survival analysis of a randomised phase 3 trial

    Stephanie M de Boer;Melanie E Powell;Linda Mileshkin;Dionyssios Katsaros

  • Future acceptance of adolescent human papillomavirus vaccination: A survey of parental attitudes

    Loretta Brabin;Stephen A. Roberts;Farah Farzaneh;Henry C. Kitchener

Frequent Co-Authors

Chris Roberts
Chris Roberts University of Manchester
Julian Peto
Julian Peto London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Peter L. Stern
Peter L. Stern University of Manchester
Hans W. Nijman
Hans W. Nijman University Medical Center Groningen
Carien L. Creutzberg
Carien L. Creutzberg Leiden University Medical Center
Suzanne M. Garland
Suzanne M. Garland University of Melbourne
Stephen A Roberts
Stephen A Roberts University of Manchester
Xavier Castellsagué
Xavier Castellsagué University of Barcelona
Jorma Paavonen
Jorma Paavonen University of Helsinki
Gary Dubin
Gary Dubin GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a future in healthcare? The USA offers a range of online degrees that prepare students for diverse roles in medicine and allied fields. These pathways give flexibility for working professionals and career changers, letting you advance your education remotely.

If you’re interested in nutrition and wellness, pursuing the best online food science degree can lead to careers in dietetics, food technology, or public health. For those looking to move into healthcare administration, online mha programs cahme accredited offer reputable options to build leadership and management skills in hospital settings.

Nurses can further their careers by exploring rn to bsn online without clinicals degrees, which allow them to earn their Bachelor of Science in Nursing without on-site requirements—ideal for busy schedules. Advanced practice nurses might opt for dnp programs online to achieve the highest level of clinical nursing expertise in a streamlined format.

By exploring these related online programs, you can discover new ways to expand your qualifications and shape your career in the ever-evolving field of medicine.

Best Scientists Citing Henry C Kitchener

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles