World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
53
Citations
13120
World Ranking
4178
National Ranking
1579

Jadwiga H. Richter publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jadwiga H. Richter sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 157 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Jadwiga H. Richter D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jadwiga H. Richter sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jadwiga H. Richter is affiliated with the National Center for Atmospheric Research in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences, with notable contributions to Global and Planetary Change and Atmospheric Science.

The scope of their work includes several specialized subfields such as Astronomy and Astrophysics, Oceanography, and aspects of Sociology and Political Science. The main topics covered by their research comprise:

  • Climate variability and models
  • Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
  • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Climate Change and Geoengineering
  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics

Jadwiga H. Richter has published extensively in several scientific venues, with frequent publications in:

  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
  • Atmospheric chemistry and physics

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Richter include:

  • "The DOE E3SM Model Version 2: Overview of the Physical Model and Initial Model Evaluation", 2022, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
  • "Initialized Earth System prediction from subseasonal to decadal timescales", 2021, Nature Reviews Earth & Environment
  • "Progress in Simulating the Quasi-Biennial Oscillation in CMIP Models", 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • "An Evaluation of the Large-Scale Atmospheric Circulation and Its Variability in CESM2 and Other CMIP Models", 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • "Evaluation of the Quasi-Biennial Oscillation in global climate models for the SPARC QBO-initiative", 2020, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society

Throughout their career, Richter has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Chih-Chieh Chen
  • Daniele Visioni
  • Anne A. Glanville
  • Douglas G. MacMartin
  • Simone Tilmes

Best Publications

  • Description of the NCAR Community Atmosphere Model (CAM 3.0)

    William Collins;J. Rasch;A. Boville;James McCaa

  • The Mean Climate of the Community Atmosphere Model (CAM4) in Forced SST and Fully Coupled Experiments

    Richard B. Neale;Jadwiga Richter;Sungsu Park;Peter H. Lauritzen

  • The Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model Version 6 (WACCM6)

    A. Gettelman;M. J. Mills;D. E. Kinnison;R. R. Garcia

  • The Impact of Convection on ENSO: From a Delayed Oscillator to a Series of Events

    Richard B. Neale;Jadwiga H. Richter;Markus Jochum

  • Toward a Physically Based Gravity Wave Source Parameterization in a General Circulation Model

    Jadwiga H. Richter;Fabrizio Sassi;Rolando R. Garcia

  • An Overview of the Atmospheric Component of the Energy Exascale Earth System Model

    P. J. Rasch;S. Xie;P.-L. Ma;W. Lin

  • Effects of Convective Momentum Transport on the Atmospheric Circulation in the Community Atmosphere Model, Version 3

    Jadwiga H. Richter;Philip J. Rasch

  • The DOE E3SM Model Version 2: Overview of the Physical Model and Initial Model Evaluation

    Unknown

  • First Simulations of Designing Stratospheric Sulfate Aerosol Geoengineering to Meet Multiple Simultaneous Climate Objectives

    Ben Kravitz;Douglas G. MacMartin;Douglas G. MacMartin;Michael J. Mills;Jadwiga H. Richter

  • CESM1(WACCM) Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering Large Ensemble Project

    Simone Tilmes;Jadwiga H. Richter;Ben Kravitz;Douglas G. MacMartin

  • Radiative and Chemical Response to Interactive Stratospheric Sulfate Aerosols in Fully Coupled CESM1(WACCM)

    Michael J. Mills;Jadwiga H. Richter;Simone Tilmes;Ben Kravitz

  • Thermosphere extension of the Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model

    H.-L. Liu;B. T. Foster;M. E. Hagan;J. M. McInerney

  • Initialized Earth System prediction from subseasonal to decadal timescales

    Gerald A. Meehl;Jadwiga H. Richter;Haiyan Teng;Antonietta Capotondi;Antonietta Capotondi

  • The Regional Hydroclimate Response to Stratospheric Sulfate Geoengineering and the Role of Stratospheric Heating

    Isla Simpson;Simone Tilmes;Jadwiga Richter;B. Kravitz;B. Kravitz

  • Progress in Simulating the Quasi‐Biennial Oscillation in CMIP Models

    Jadwiga H. Richter;James A. Anstey;Neal Butchart;Yoshio Kawatani

  • WACCM simulations of the mean circulation and trace species transport in the winter mesosphere

    Anne K. Smith;Rolando R. Garcia;Daniel R. Marsh;Jadwiga H. Richter

  • The climate response to stratospheric aerosol geoengineering can be tailored using multiple injection locations

    Douglas G. MacMartin;Douglas G. MacMartin;Ben Kravitz;Simone Tilmes;Jadwiga H. Richter

  • An Evaluation of the Large-Scale Atmospheric Circulation and Its Variability in CESM2 and Other CMIP Models

    Isla R. Simpson;Julio Bacmeister;Richard B. Neale;Cecile Hannay

  • Sensitivity of Aerosol Distribution and Climate Response to Stratospheric SO2 Injection Locations

    Simone Tilmes;Jadwiga H. Richter;Michael J. Mills;Ben Kravitz

  • Scenarios for modeling solar radiation modification

    Unknown

  • The roles of planetary and gravity waves during a major stratospheric sudden warming as characterized in WACCM

    Varavut Limpasuvan;Jadwiga H. Richter;Yvan J. Orsolini;Frode Stordal

  • Stratospheric dynamical response and ozone feedbacks in the presence of SO2 injections

    Jadwiga H. Richter;Simone Tilmes;Michael J. Mills;Joseph J. Tribbia

Frequent Co-Authors

Ben Kravitz
Ben Kravitz Indiana University
Simone Tilmes
Simone Tilmes National Center for Atmospheric Research
Michael J. Mills
Michael J. Mills National Center for Atmospheric Research
Rolando R. Garcia
Rolando R. Garcia National Center for Atmospheric Research
Isla R. Simpson
Isla R. Simpson National Center for Atmospheric Research
Julio T. Bacmeister
Julio T. Bacmeister National Center for Atmospheric Research
Joseph Tribbia
Joseph Tribbia National Center for Atmospheric Research
Jean-Francois Lamarque
Jean-Francois Lamarque National Center for Atmospheric Research
Anne K. Smith
Anne K. Smith National Center for Atmospheric Research
Francis Vitt
Francis Vitt National Center for Atmospheric Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens many pathways that go beyond traditional ecology roles. For those interested in spatial data and environmental mapping, pursuing a gis degree can be a strategic choice. GIS technology is increasingly crucial for addressing environmental challenges through data visualization and analysis.

Leadership and policy-making also play key roles in environmental progress. An accelerated 1 year mpa online equips students with public administration skills, preparing them to influence and implement sustainable policies effectively.

Understanding human behavior and societal impacts is vital for environmental solutions. Complementing science with a bachelors degree in sociology online can provide fresh perspectives on environmental justice and community engagement.

For professionals seeking advanced education without the traditional dissertation requirement, exploring an online edd no dissertation option offers flexibility and focused leadership training, ideal for educators or environmental program administrators aiming to drive impactful change.

Best Scientists Citing Jadwiga H. Richter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles