What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
Brendan Gleeson spends much of his time researching Urban planning, Economic growth, Environmental studies, Urban studies and Context.
Brendan Gleeson mostly deals with Regional planning in his studies of Urban planning.
His work in Regional planning addresses subjects such as Land-use planning, which are connected to disciplines such as Transportation planning, Sustainability organizations, Gender studies and Legislation.
His research in Economic growth intersects with topics in Disadvantage, Human geography and Social status.
The Environmental studies study combines topics in areas such as Environmental ethics, Corporate governance and Welfare.
In his research, Dialectic, Environmental quality, Environmental justice and Economic Justice is intimately related to Politics, which falls under the overarching field of Environmental ethics.
His most cited work include:
- Geographies of disability (323 citations)
- Justice, Society and Nature : An Exploration of Political Ecology (220 citations)
- Australian Urban Planning: New Challenges, New Agendas (133 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Brendan Gleeson focuses on Urban planning, Economic growth, Environmental planning, Politics and Public administration.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Transportation planning and Environmental design and planning, Land-use planning.
His Economic growth research is mostly focused on the topic Urban studies.
The concepts of his Politics study are interwoven with issues in Economic Justice, Political economy and Sustainability.
The various areas that Brendan Gleeson examines in his Public administration study include Legislation and Corporate governance.
Brendan Gleeson interconnects Environmental ethics and Social science in the investigation of issues within Environmental studies.
He most often published in these fields:
- Urban planning (23.21%)
- Economic growth (19.64%)
- Environmental planning (15.63%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2017-2021)?
- Degrowth (4.02%)
- Urban studies (9.82%)
- Political economy (11.16%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His scientific interests lie mostly in Degrowth, Urban studies, Political economy, Politics and Corporate governance.
His Urban studies research is within the category of Economic growth.
His Economic growth study incorporates themes from Sustainable city and Sustainability organizations.
His research integrates issues of Urban politics, Social movement, Capitalism and Grassroots in his study of Political economy.
As a part of the same scientific family, Brendan Gleeson mostly works in the field of Politics, focusing on Action and, on occasion, Environmental ethics.
His studies deal with areas such as Urban climate, Environmental planning and Public administration as well as Corporate governance.
Between 2017 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Reconfiguring urban governance in an age of rising city networks: A research agenda: (26 citations)
- Degrowth in the Suburbs: A Radical Urban Imaginary (16 citations)
- Urban Sustainability Transitions (13 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
Brendan Gleeson mostly deals with Urban studies, Corporate governance, Economic growth, Environmental planning and Urbanization.
His studies in Urban studies integrate themes in fields like Metropolitan area, Climate governance and Political ecology.
His Corporate governance research integrates issues from Urban climate, Public administration and Action.
The Urban climate study which covers Environmental ethics that intersects with Politics.
His work on Economic growth is being expanded to include thematically relevant topics such as Environmental studies.
His studies examine the connections between Urbanization and genetics, as well as such issues in Scholarship, with regards to Sustainability organizations, Regional science and Gender studies.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
