World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 35 9362 8967 32 31 163 3929

Radka Kodešová publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Radka Kodešová between 1998 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Radka Kodešová published across 29 years, from 1998 to 2026, averaging 6.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2018. 8 of the 188 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2018. 1998: 2 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 0 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 5 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 17 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 16 publications 2025: 7 publications 2026: 1 publication
1998 2026

188 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Radka Kodešová: publications per year, 1998 to 2026
Year Publications
1998 2
1999 2
2000 0
2001 1
2002 0
2003 1
2004 1
2005 0
2006 4
2007 1
2008 5
2009 7
2010 14
2011 4
2012 4
2013 11
2014 13
2015 12
2016 13
2017 7
2018 17
2019 5
2020 8
2021 7
2022 16
2023 9
2024 16
2025 7
2026 1
Total 188
Download as CSV

Radka Kodešová publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Radka Kodešová sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 161–170 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 163 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444 163
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Radka Kodešová D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Radka Kodešová sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163 35
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Radka Kodešová is affiliated with the Czech University of Life Sciences Prague in the Czech Republic. Their research primarily focuses on Environmental Science, with significant contributions to subfields such as Pollution, Soil Science, Environmental Engineering, Civil and Structural Engineering, and Pharmacology.

Kodešová's work addresses several key topics, including:

  • Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
  • Soil and Unsaturated Flow
  • Soil erosion and sediment transport
  • Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
  • Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
  • Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
  • Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics

The set of recent papers associated with Kodešová illustrates the scope of their investigation:

  • "The impact of various mulch types on soil properties controlling water regime of the Haplic Fluvisol", 2020, Soil and Tillage Research
  • "Estimation of vineyard soil structure and preferential flow using dye tracer, X-ray tomography, and numerical simulations", 2020, Geoderma
  • "Contamination of water, soil, and plants by micropollutants from reclaimed wastewater and sludge from a wastewater treatment plant", 2023, The Science of The Total Environment
  • "Microbial responses to selected pharmaceuticals in agricultural soils: Microcosm study on the roles of soil, treatment and time", 2020, Soil Biology and Biochemistry
  • "Uptake, translocation and transformation of three pharmaceuticals in green pea plants", 2020, Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Kodešová include:

  • Aleš Klement
  • Miroslav Fér
  • Antonín Nikodem
  • Roman Grabic
  • Lenka Pavlů

Their publications are prominently featured in several scientific journals, reflecting their disciplinary focus and research impact. The most frequent publication venues are:

  • Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Soil and Tillage Research
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Geoderma Regional

Best Publications

  • Pharmaceuticals' sorptions relative to properties of thirteen different soils.

    Radka Kodešová;Roman Grabic;Martin Kočárek;Aleš Klement

  • Pesticide adsorption in relation to soil properties and soil type distribution in regional scale.

    Radka Kodešová;Martin Kočárek;Vít Kodeš;Ondřej Drábek

  • An analysis of the dissipation of pharmaceuticals under thirteen different soil conditions.

    Radka Kodešová;Martin Kočárek;Aleš Klement;Oksana Golovko

  • Soil structure and soil hydraulic properties of Haplic Luvisol used as arable land and grassland

    Radka Kodešová;Veronika Jirků;Vít Kodeš;Marcela Mühlhanselová

  • Temporal variability of structure and hydraulic properties of topsoil of three soil types

    Veronika Jirků;Radka Kodešová;Antonín Nikodem;Marcela Mühlhanselová

  • Impact of varying soil structure on transport processes in different diagnostic horizons of three soil types

    Radka Kodešová;Nadia Vignozzi;Marcela Rohošková;Tereza Hájková

  • Estimating hysteresis in the soil water retention function from cone permeameter experiments

    Jiří Šimůnek;Radka Kodešová;Molly M. Gribb;Martinus T. van Genuchten

  • Antibiotics degradation in soil: A case of clindamycin, trimethoprim, sulfamethoxazole and their transformation products.

    Olga Koba;Oksana Golovko;Radka Kodešová;Miroslav Fér

  • Simple but efficient signal pre-processing in soil organic carbon spectroscopic estimation

    Radim Vašát;Radka Kodešová;Aleš Klement;Luboš Borůvka

  • Transformation of atenolol, metoprolol, and carbamazepine in soils: The identification, quantification, and stability of the transformation products and further implications for the environment.

    Olga Koba;Oksana Golovko;Radka Kodešová;Aleš Klement

  • Impact of Soil Micromorphological Features on Water Flow and Herbicide Transport in Soils

    Radka Kodešová;Martin Kočárek;Vít Kodeš;Jirí Šimůnek

  • Root uptake of atenolol, sulfamethoxazole and carbamazepine, and their transformation in three soils and four plants.

    Radka Kodešová;Aleš Klement;Oksana Golovko;Miroslav Fér

  • Unsaturated hydraulic behaviour of a permeable pavement: Laboratory investigation and numerical analysis by using the HYDRUS-2D model

    Michele Turco;Radka Kodešová;Giuseppe Brunetti;Antonín Nikodem

  • Impact of plant roots and soil organisms on soil micromorphology and hydraulic properties

    Radka Kodešová;Vít Kodeš;Anna Žigová;Jiří Šimůnek

  • Soil influences on uptake and transfer of pharmaceuticals from sewage sludge amended soils to spinach.

    Radka Kodešová;Aleš Klement;Oksana Golovko;Miroslav Fér

  • Using Dye Tracer for Visualization of Preferential Flow at Macro- and Microscales

    Radka Kodešová;Karel Němeček;Vít Kodeš;Vít Kodeš;Anna Žigová

  • Comparison of soil hydraulic property measurement methods

    M. M. Gribb;R. Kodesova;S. E. Ordway

  • Estimation of the Dual‐Permeability Model Parameters using Tension Disk Infiltrometer and Guelph Permeameter

    Radka Kodešová;Jiří Šimůnek;Antonín Nikodem;Veronika Jirků

  • Soil aggregate stability within morphologically diverse areas

    Ondřej Jakšík;Radka Kodešová;Adam Kubiš;Iva Stehlíková

  • Development of fast and robust multiresidual LC-MS/MS method for determination of pharmaceuticals in soils.

    Oksana Golovko;Olga Koba;Radka Kodesova;Ganna Fedorova

  • Simultaneous sorption of four ionizable pharmaceuticals in different horizons of three soil types.

    Martin Kočárek;Radka Kodešová;Lenka Vondráčková;Oksana Golovko

  • Comparison of aggregate stability within six soil profiles under conventional tillage using various laboratory tests.

    Radka Kodešová;Marcela Rohošková;Anna Žigová

  • Simulating nonequilibrium movement of water, solutes and particles using hydrus – a review of recent applications

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Roman Grabic
Roman Grabic University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice
Jiří Šimůnek
Jiří Šimůnek University of California, Riverside
Vít Penížek
Vít Penížek Czech University of Life Sciences Prague
R. J. Gilkes
R. J. Gilkes University of Western Australia
Jirka Šimůnek
Jirka Šimůnek University of California, Riverside
Paul D. Hallett
Paul D. Hallett University of Aberdeen
Michael Komárek
Michael Komárek Czech University of Life Sciences Prague
Bryan W. Brooks
Bryan W. Brooks Baylor University
Gurpal S. Toor
Gurpal S. Toor University of Maryland, College Park
Stephan Peth
Stephan Peth University of Hannover

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens doors to a variety of related fields and career opportunities. Many students complement their knowledge with specialized skills like Geographic Information Systems (GIS), which are crucial for mapping and analyzing environmental data. To explore top programs in this area, check out the best gis schools.

Public administration also plays a vital role in environmental policy and sustainable development. For those interested in leadership roles within government or non-profits, pursuing an online Master of Public Administration can be a strategic move. Consider the online mpa degrees that offer flexibility and accelerated options.

Understanding social dynamics and human behavior is essential when addressing environmental issues. An online bachelor's degree in sociology can provide insights into societal impacts and community engagement. To learn more about such programs, visit the page on sociology bachelor degree online.

For those aiming for advanced research or academic careers without the lengthy dissertation process, there are innovative options like 1 year phd programs online no dissertation. These programs allow you to deepen your expertise and contribute to environmental solutions faster.

Best Scientists Citing Radka Kodešová

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles