World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
35
Citations
3929
World Ranking
9362
National Ranking
32

Radka Kodešová publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Radka Kodešová sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 163 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Radka Kodešová D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Radka Kodešová sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Radka Kodešová is affiliated with the Czech University of Life Sciences Prague in the Czech Republic. Their research primarily focuses on Environmental Science, with significant contributions to subfields such as Pollution, Soil Science, Environmental Engineering, Civil and Structural Engineering, and Pharmacology.

Kodešová's work addresses several key topics, including:

  • Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
  • Soil and Unsaturated Flow
  • Soil erosion and sediment transport
  • Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
  • Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
  • Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
  • Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics

The set of recent papers associated with Kodešová illustrates the scope of their investigation:

  • "The impact of various mulch types on soil properties controlling water regime of the Haplic Fluvisol", 2020, Soil and Tillage Research
  • "Estimation of vineyard soil structure and preferential flow using dye tracer, X-ray tomography, and numerical simulations", 2020, Geoderma
  • "Contamination of water, soil, and plants by micropollutants from reclaimed wastewater and sludge from a wastewater treatment plant", 2023, The Science of The Total Environment
  • "Microbial responses to selected pharmaceuticals in agricultural soils: Microcosm study on the roles of soil, treatment and time", 2020, Soil Biology and Biochemistry
  • "Uptake, translocation and transformation of three pharmaceuticals in green pea plants", 2020, Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Kodešová include:

  • Aleš Klement
  • Miroslav Fér
  • Antonín Nikodem
  • Roman Grabic
  • Lenka Pavlů

Their publications are prominently featured in several scientific journals, reflecting their disciplinary focus and research impact. The most frequent publication venues are:

  • Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Soil and Tillage Research
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Geoderma Regional

Best Publications

  • Pharmaceuticals' sorptions relative to properties of thirteen different soils.

    Radka Kodešová;Roman Grabic;Martin Kočárek;Aleš Klement

  • Pesticide adsorption in relation to soil properties and soil type distribution in regional scale.

    Radka Kodešová;Martin Kočárek;Vít Kodeš;Ondřej Drábek

  • An analysis of the dissipation of pharmaceuticals under thirteen different soil conditions.

    Radka Kodešová;Martin Kočárek;Aleš Klement;Oksana Golovko

  • Soil structure and soil hydraulic properties of Haplic Luvisol used as arable land and grassland

    Radka Kodešová;Veronika Jirků;Vít Kodeš;Marcela Mühlhanselová

  • Temporal variability of structure and hydraulic properties of topsoil of three soil types

    Veronika Jirků;Radka Kodešová;Antonín Nikodem;Marcela Mühlhanselová

  • Impact of varying soil structure on transport processes in different diagnostic horizons of three soil types

    Radka Kodešová;Nadia Vignozzi;Marcela Rohošková;Tereza Hájková

  • Estimating hysteresis in the soil water retention function from cone permeameter experiments

    Jiří Šimůnek;Radka Kodešová;Molly M. Gribb;Martinus T. van Genuchten

  • Antibiotics degradation in soil: A case of clindamycin, trimethoprim, sulfamethoxazole and their transformation products.

    Olga Koba;Oksana Golovko;Radka Kodešová;Miroslav Fér

  • Simple but efficient signal pre-processing in soil organic carbon spectroscopic estimation

    Radim Vašát;Radka Kodešová;Aleš Klement;Luboš Borůvka

  • Transformation of atenolol, metoprolol, and carbamazepine in soils: The identification, quantification, and stability of the transformation products and further implications for the environment.

    Olga Koba;Oksana Golovko;Radka Kodešová;Aleš Klement

  • Impact of Soil Micromorphological Features on Water Flow and Herbicide Transport in Soils

    Radka Kodešová;Martin Kočárek;Vít Kodeš;Jirí Šimůnek

  • Root uptake of atenolol, sulfamethoxazole and carbamazepine, and their transformation in three soils and four plants.

    Radka Kodešová;Aleš Klement;Oksana Golovko;Miroslav Fér

  • Unsaturated hydraulic behaviour of a permeable pavement: Laboratory investigation and numerical analysis by using the HYDRUS-2D model

    Michele Turco;Radka Kodešová;Giuseppe Brunetti;Antonín Nikodem

  • Impact of plant roots and soil organisms on soil micromorphology and hydraulic properties

    Radka Kodešová;Vít Kodeš;Anna Žigová;Jiří Šimůnek

  • Soil influences on uptake and transfer of pharmaceuticals from sewage sludge amended soils to spinach.

    Radka Kodešová;Aleš Klement;Oksana Golovko;Miroslav Fér

  • Using Dye Tracer for Visualization of Preferential Flow at Macro- and Microscales

    Radka Kodešová;Karel Němeček;Vít Kodeš;Vít Kodeš;Anna Žigová

  • Comparison of soil hydraulic property measurement methods

    M. M. Gribb;R. Kodesova;S. E. Ordway

  • Estimation of the Dual‐Permeability Model Parameters using Tension Disk Infiltrometer and Guelph Permeameter

    Radka Kodešová;Jiří Šimůnek;Antonín Nikodem;Veronika Jirků

  • Soil aggregate stability within morphologically diverse areas

    Ondřej Jakšík;Radka Kodešová;Adam Kubiš;Iva Stehlíková

  • Development of fast and robust multiresidual LC-MS/MS method for determination of pharmaceuticals in soils.

    Oksana Golovko;Olga Koba;Radka Kodesova;Ganna Fedorova

  • Simultaneous sorption of four ionizable pharmaceuticals in different horizons of three soil types.

    Martin Kočárek;Radka Kodešová;Lenka Vondráčková;Oksana Golovko

  • Comparison of aggregate stability within six soil profiles under conventional tillage using various laboratory tests.

    Radka Kodešová;Marcela Rohošková;Anna Žigová

  • Simulating nonequilibrium movement of water, solutes and particles using hydrus – a review of recent applications

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Roman Grabic
Roman Grabic University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice
Jiří Šimůnek
Jiří Šimůnek University of California, Riverside
Vít Penížek
Vít Penížek Czech University of Life Sciences Prague
R. J. Gilkes
R. J. Gilkes University of Western Australia
Jirka Šimůnek
Jirka Šimůnek University of California, Riverside
Paul D. Hallett
Paul D. Hallett University of Aberdeen
Michael Komárek
Michael Komárek Czech University of Life Sciences Prague
Bryan W. Brooks
Bryan W. Brooks Baylor University
Gurpal S. Toor
Gurpal S. Toor University of Maryland, College Park
Stephan Peth
Stephan Peth University of Hannover

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens doors to a variety of related fields and career opportunities. Many students complement their knowledge with specialized skills like Geographic Information Systems (GIS), which are crucial for mapping and analyzing environmental data. To explore top programs in this area, check out the best gis schools.

Public administration also plays a vital role in environmental policy and sustainable development. For those interested in leadership roles within government or non-profits, pursuing an online Master of Public Administration can be a strategic move. Consider the online mpa degrees that offer flexibility and accelerated options.

Understanding social dynamics and human behavior is essential when addressing environmental issues. An online bachelor's degree in sociology can provide insights into societal impacts and community engagement. To learn more about such programs, visit the page on sociology bachelor degree online.

For those aiming for advanced research or academic careers without the lengthy dissertation process, there are innovative options like 1 year phd programs online no dissertation. These programs allow you to deepen your expertise and contribute to environmental solutions faster.

Best Scientists Citing Radka Kodešová

Trending Scientists