World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
104
Citations
40448
World Ranking
290
National Ranking
131

Jiří Šimůnek publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jiří Šimůnek sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 690 publications — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Jiří Šimůnek D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jiří Šimůnek sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 104 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Development and Applications of the HYDRUS and STANMOD Software Packages and Related Codes

    Jirí Šimůnek;Martinus Th. van Genuchten;Miroslav Šejna

  • Review and comparison of models for describing non-equilibrium and preferential flow and transport in the vadose zone

    Jirka Šimůnek;Nick J. Jarvis;M.Th. van Genuchten;Annemieke Gärdenäs

  • Recent Developments and Applications of the HYDRUS Computer Software Packages

    Jiří Šimůnek;Martinus Th. van Genuchten;Miroslav Šejna

  • Modeling colloid attachment, straining, and exclusion in saturated porous media.

    Scott A. Bradford;Jirka Simunek;Mehdi Bettahar;Martinus Th. Van Genuchten

  • Physical factors affecting the transport and fate of colloids in saturated porous media

    Scott A. Bradford;Scott R. Yates;Mehdi Bettahar;Jirka Simunek

  • Reactive transport codes for subsurface environmental simulation

    C. I. Steefel;C. A. J. Appelo;B. Arora;D. Jacques

  • Modeling Soil Processes: Review, Key Challenges, and New Perspectives

    H. Vereecken;A. Schnepf;J. W. Hopmans;M. Javaux

  • Modeling Nonequilibrium Flow and Transport Processes Using HYDRUS

    Jirka Šimůnek;Martinus Th. van Genuchten

  • Numerical Analysis of Coupled Water, Vapor, and Heat Transport in the Vadose Zone

    Hirotaka Saito;Jiri Šimůnek;Binayak P. Mohanty

  • Modeling compensated root water and nutrient uptake.

    Jiří Šimůnek;Jan W. Hopmans

  • Water flow and heat transport in frozen soil : Numerical solution and freeze-thaw applications

    Klas Hansson;Jirka Simunek;Masaru Mizoguchi;Lars-Christer Lundin

  • Comparison of HYDRUS-2D simulations of drip irrigation with experimental observations

    T. H. Skaggs;T. J. Trout;J. Simunek;P. J. Shouse

  • Calibration of a two-dimensional root water uptake model

    J. A. Vrugt;J. W. Hopmans;J. Šimunek

  • Two-dimensional modeling of nitrate leaching for various fertigation scenarios under micro-irrigation

    A.I. Gärdenäs;J.W. Hopmans;B.R. Hanson;J. Šimůnek

  • One-, two-, and three-dimensional root water uptake functions for transient modeling

    J. A. Vrugt;M. T. van Wijk;J. W. Hopmans;J. Šimunek

  • A review of model applications for structured soils: a) Water flow and tracer transport.

    John Maximilian Köhne;Sigrid Köhne;Jirka Šimůnek

  • Modeling of Carbon Dioxide Transport and Production in Soil 1. Model Development

    Jiří Šimůnek;Donald L. Suarez

  • Significance of straining in colloid deposition: Evidence and implications

    S. A. Bradford;J. Simunek;M. Bettahar;M. T. van Genuchten

  • Straining and Attachment of Colloids in Physically Heterogeneous Porous Media

    Scott A. Bradford;Mehdi Bettahar;Jirka Simunek;Martinus Th. van Genuchten

  • Evaluation of urea-ammonium-nitrate fertigation with drip irrigation using numerical modeling

    Blaine R. Hanson;Jirka Šimůnek;Jan W. Hopmans

Frequent Co-Authors

Scott A. Bradford
Scott A. Bradford Agricultural Research Service
Radka Kodešová
Radka Kodešová Czech University of Life Sciences Prague
Erwin Klumpp
Erwin Klumpp Forschungszentrum Jülich
Donald L. Suarez
Donald L. Suarez Agricultural Research Service
Jan W. Hopmans
Jan W. Hopmans University of California, Davis
K. P. Sudheer
K. P. Sudheer Indian Institute of Technology Madras
Harry Vereecken
Harry Vereecken Forschungszentrum Jülich
Guanhua Huang
Guanhua Huang China Agricultural University
Marc Heggen
Marc Heggen Forschungszentrum Jülich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens doors to diverse career paths that often intersect with other disciplines. For instance, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) play a crucial role in environmental data analysis, making a gis degree a valuable complement to your environmental expertise. GIS technology helps in mapping ecosystems, tracking changes, and supporting conservation efforts.

Management and policy knowledge are also essential, especially for those aiming to influence environmental regulations. Programs like the best online masters in public administration offer convenient pathways to build leadership skills tailored to public and environmental affairs without interrupting your career.

Understanding social dynamics is equally important in addressing environmental challenges. Online programs such as online sociology bachelor programs provide insights into human behavior, social structures, and community engagement, crucial for effective environmental advocacy and policy implementation.

For professionals seeking advanced knowledge with fewer barriers, certain doctoral programs online no dissertation options allow for a flexible approach to earning a doctorate. These programs are well-suited for those balancing work, research, and continuing education in environmental sciences and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Jiří Šimůnek