World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 48 15427 13909 229 202 145 6393

Per Jemth publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Per Jemth between 1996 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Per Jemth published across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, averaging 5.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2022. 4 of the 170 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2022. 1996: 1 publication 1997: 3 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 4 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 2 publications
1996 2025

170 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Per Jemth: publications per year, 1996 to 2025
Year Publications
1996 1
1997 3
1998 2
1999 2
2000 3
2001 2
2002 3
2003 3
2004 1
2005 4
2006 4
2007 5
2008 6
2009 6
2010 7
2011 3
2012 12
2013 6
2014 14
2015 5
2016 8
2017 7
2018 4
2019 6
2020 12
2021 11
2022 17
2023 9
2024 2
2025 2
Total 170
Download as CSV

Per Jemth publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Per Jemth sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 145 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218 145
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Per Jemth D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Per Jemth sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835 48
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Per Jemth is affiliated with Uppsala University in Sweden and has contributed extensively to the field of biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Their research primarily focuses on molecular biology, with significant involvement in materials chemistry, infectious diseases, cell biology, and spectroscopy as subfields.

The scientist's work covers several key topics including protein structure and dynamics, enzyme structure and function, RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms, ubiquitin and proteasome pathways, vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches, RNA research and splicing, and bacteriophages and microbial interactions.

Per Jemth has authored numerous research papers published in a variety of scientific journals. Notable recent publications include:

  • "Fuzziness and Frustration in the Energy Landscape of Protein Folding, Function, and Assembly," 2021, Accounts of Chemical Research
  • "Proteome-scale mapping of binding sites in the unstructured regions of the human proteome," 2022, Molecular Systems Biology
  • "Large scale discovery of coronavirus-host factor protein interaction motifs reveals SARS-CoV-2 specific mechanisms and vulnerabilities," 2021, Nature Communications
  • "Templated folding of intrinsically disordered proteins," 2020, Journal of Biological Chemistry
  • "Large-scale phage-based screening reveals extensive pan-viral mimicry of host short linear motifs," 2023, Nature Communications

The scientist frequently publishes in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), the Journal of Molecular Biology, Nature Communications, Protein Science, and the Journal of Biological Chemistry. These publications demonstrate a range of contributions over time to these journals.

Throughout their career, Per Jemth has collaborated regularly with several researchers, including Eva Andersson, Filip Mihalič, Ylva Ivarsson, Caroline Benz, and Leandro Simonetti. These collaborations reflect sustained research partnerships in related scientific investigations.

Best Publications

  • A high-affinity, dimeric inhibitor of PSD-95 bivalently interacts with PDZ1-2 and protects against ischemic brain damage

    Anders Bach;Bettina H. Clausen;Magda Møller;Bente Vestergaard

  • PDZ domains: folding and binding.

    Per Jemth;Stefano Gianni

  • Single molecule unfolding and stretching of protein domains inside a solid-state nanopore by electric field

    Kevin J. Freedman;S. Raza Haq;Joshua B. Edel;Per Jemth

  • Phospholipid hydroperoxide glutathione peroxidase activity of human glutathione transferases.

    Rachel Hurst;Yongping Bao;Per Jemth;Bengt Mannervik

  • Distinguishing induced fit from conformational selection

    Stefano Gianni;Stefano Gianni;Jakob Dogan;Per Jemth

  • Helical Propensity in an Intrinsically Disordered Protein Accelerates Ligand Binding

    Vytautas Iešmantavičius;Jakob Dogan;Per Jemth;Kaare Teilum

  • Chemical, thermal, and electric field induced unfolding of single protein molecules studied using nanopores.

    Kevin J. Freedman;Maike Jürgens;Anmiv Prabhu;Chi Won Ahn

  • The binding mechanisms of intrinsically disordered proteins

    Jakob Dogan;Stefano Gianni;Stefano Gianni;Per Jemth

  • Biosynthetic Oligosaccharide Libraries for Identification of Protein-binding Heparan Sulfate Motifs EXPLORING THE STRUCTURAL DIVERSITY BY SCREENING FOR FIBROBLAST GROWTH FACTOR (FGF) 1 AND FGF2 BINDING

    Per Jemth;Johan Kreuger;Marion Kusche-Gullberg;Luisa Sturiale

  • Fuzziness and Frustration in the Energy Landscape of Protein Folding, Function, and Assembly.

    Stefano Gianni;María Inés Freiberger;Per Jemth;Diego U. Ferreiro

  • Demonstration of a low-energy on-pathway intermediate in a fast-folding protein by kinetics, protein engineering, and simulation.

    Per Jemth;Stefano Gianni;Ryan Day;Bin Li

  • The transition state structure for coupled binding and folding of disordered protein domains.

    Jakob Dogan;Xin Mu;Åke Engström;Per Jemth

  • Fibroblast growth factors share binding sites in heparan sulphate.

    Johan Kreuger;Per Jemth;Emil Sanders-Lindberg;Liat Eliahu

  • Affinity and specificity of motif-based protein-protein interactions

    Ylva Ivarsson;Per Jemth

  • Fast association and slow transitions in the interaction between two intrinsically disordered protein domains.

    Jakob Dogan;Tanja Schmidt;Xin Mu;Åke Engström

  • Demonstration of Long-Range Interactions in a PDZ Domain by NMR, Kinetics, and Protein Engineering

    Stefano Gianni;Tine Walma;Alessandro Arcovito;Nicoletta Calosci

  • Processing of macromolecular heparin by heparanase

    Feng Gong;Per Jemth;Martha L Escobar Galvis;Israel Vlodavsky

  • Reassessing a sparse energetic network within a single protein domain

    Celestine N. Chi;Lisa Elfström;Yao Shi;Tord Snäll

  • The kinetics of PDZ domain-ligand interactions and implications for the binding mechanism.

    Stefano Gianni;Åke Engström;Mårten Larsson;Nicoletta Calosci

  • Coupled binding and folding of intrinsically disordered proteins : what can we learn from kinetics?

    Stefano Gianni;Jakob Dogan;Per Jemth

  • Renal cell carcinoma risk in type 2 von Hippel-Lindau disease correlates with defects in pVHL stability and HIF-1alpha interactions.

    K Knauth;C Bex;Per Jemth;Per Jemth;A Buchberger

Frequent Co-Authors

Stefano Gianni
Stefano Gianni Sapienza University of Rome
Åke Engström
Åke Engström Uppsala University
Bengt Mannervik
Bengt Mannervik Stockholm University
Maurizio Brunori
Maurizio Brunori Sapienza University of Rome
Joshua B. Edel
Joshua B. Edel Imperial College London
Carlo Camilloni
Carlo Camilloni University of Milan
Ulf Lindahl
Ulf Lindahl Uppsala University
Leif Andersson
Leif Andersson Texas A&M University
Alan R. Fersht
Alan R. Fersht University of Cambridge
Norman E. Davey
Norman E. Davey Institute of Cancer Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Chemistry, branching into forensic science offers a dynamic career path with practical applications. Many aspiring professionals explore the best online colleges for forensic science, which provide flexible learning options without compromising educational quality. These programs often combine core chemistry knowledge with forensic methodologies, preparing graduates for roles in criminal investigations.

Further specialization is available through programs such as the online forensic psychology masters. This degree bridges the gap between science and psychology, offering unique insights into criminal behavior alongside analytical skills.

When considering a career in this field, it’s important to understand the financial aspects. Knowing how much is a criminal justice degree can help prospective students budget effectively while pursuing their education.

Career prospects are promising, with competitive pay scales to match. Forensic scientists can earn a rewarding income, as detailed in the overview of forensic scientist salary. Overall, online degree pathways offer accessible routes into this exciting and impactful profession.

Best Scientists Citing Per Jemth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles