World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
76
Citations
19368
World Ranking
1214
National Ranking
526

Mark B. David publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark B. David sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 184 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Mark B. David D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark B. David sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2013 - Environmental Quality Research Award, American Society of Agronomy
  • 2006 - Fellow of the American Society of Agronomy (ASA)
  • 2005 - Fellow of the Soil Science Society of America (SSSA)

Overview

Mark B. David is affiliated with the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in the United States. Their research contributions span topics within building and construction, with specific focus areas on urban design and spatial analysis as well as building information modeling (BIM) and construction integration.

The scientist's recent published papers include:

  • Complexity and Use in Building Evaluation (CUBE2): The Modular Case of the BCR Corridors at Qatar University, 2021, Building Resilience at Universities: Role of Innovation and Entrepreneurship
  • Sa1650: GUT MICROBIOTA-DERIVED METABOLISM OF 5-FLUOROURACIL AFFECTS DRUG EFFICACY, 2022, Gastroenterology
  • Table of Contents, 2023, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine
  • Table of Contents, 2024, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine

Frequent co-authors working alongside Mark B. David include:

  • Kenneth Lam-Vice
  • Jan van der Veen
  • Richard Baseil
  • William Colacchio
  • Sharon Turk

The scientist has appeared most frequently in the following publication venues:

  • IEEE Signal Processing Magazine
  • Building Resilience at Universities: Role of Innovation and Entrepreneurship
  • Gastroenterology

Mark B. David's main subfield of study is building and construction. Their research topics incorporate:

  • Urban Design and Spatial Analysis
  • BIM and Construction Integration

During their career, the scientist has been recognized with the following awards:

  • Environmental Quality Research Award, American Society of Agronomy, 2013
  • Fellow of the American Society of Agronomy (ASA), 2006
  • Fellow of the Soil Science Society of America (SSSA), 2005

Best Publications

  • Nutrient Imbalances in agricultural development

    P.M. Vitousek;Rosamond L. Naylor;T. Crews;M.B. David

  • METHODS FOR MEASURING DENITRIFICATION: DIVERSE APPROACHES TO A DIFFICULT PROBLEM

    Peter M. Groffman;Mark A. Altabet;John K. Bohlke;Klaus Butterbach-Bahl

  • Replacing bare fallows with cover crops in fertilizer-intensive cropping systems: A meta-analysis of crop yield and N dynamics.

    C. Tonitto;M.B. David;L.E. Drinkwater

  • Sources of nitrate yields in the Mississippi River Basin.

    Mark B. David;Laurie E. Drinkwater;Gregory F. McIsaac

  • Timing of Riverine Export of Nitrate and Phosphorus from Agricultural Watersheds in Illinois: Implications for Reducing Nutrient Loading to the Mississippi River

    Todd V. Royer;Mark B. David;Lowell E. Gentry

  • Nitrogen Balance in and Export from an Agricultural Watershed

    Mark B. David;Lowell E. Gentry;David A. Kovacic;Karen M. Smith

  • Temperature and moisture effects on the production of dissolved organic carbon in a Spodosol

    Martin J. Christ;Mark B. David

  • Effectiveness of Constructed Wetlands in Reducing Nitrogen and Phosphorus Export from Agricultural Tile Drainage

    David A. Kovacic;Mark B. David;Lowell E. Gentry;Karen M. Starks

  • Transport and fate of nitrate in headwater agricultural streams in Illinois.

    Todd V. Royer;Jennifer L. Tank;Mark B. David

  • Anthropogenic inputs of nitrogen and phosphorus and riverine export for Illinois, USA.

    Mark B. David;Lowell E. Gentry

  • Phosphorus transport pathways to streams in tile-drained agricultural watersheds.

    L. E. Gentry;M. B. David;T. V. Royer;C. A. Mitchell

  • Miscanthus: A Promising Biomass Crop

    Emily A. Heaton;Frank G. Dohleman;A. Fernando Miguez;John A. Juvik

  • Eutrophication: Nitrate flux in the Mississippi River

    Gregory F. McIsaac;Mark B. David;George Z. Gertner;Donald A. Goolsby

  • Dynamic modeling of nitrogen losses in river networks unravels the coupled effects of hydrological and biogeochemical processes

    Richard B. Alexander;John Karl Böhlke;Elizabeth W. Boyer;Mark B. David

  • A new mechanism for calcium loss in forest-floor soils

    Gregory B. Lawrence;Mark B. David;Walter C. Shortle

  • Denitrifying Bioreactors for Nitrate Removal: A Meta-Analysis.

    Kelly Addy;Arthur J. Gold;Laura E. Christianson;Mark B. David

  • Nutrient uptake in streams draining agricultural catchments of the midwestern United States

    Melody J. Bernot;Jennifer L. Tank;Todd V. Royer;Mark B. David

  • Benthic organic carbon influences denitrification in streams with high nitrate concentration

    Clay P. Arango;Jennifer L. Tank;Jamie L. Schaller;Todd V. Royer

  • Aluminum speciation and equilibria in soil solutions of a Haplorthod in the Adirondack Mountains (New York, U.S.A.)

    Mark B. David;Mark B. David;Charles T. Driscoll;Charles T. Driscoll

  • Excess Nitrogen in the U.S. Environment: Trends, Risks, and Solutions

    E.A. Davidson;M.B. David;J.N. Galloway;C.L. Goodale

Frequent Co-Authors

George F. Vance
George F. Vance University of Wyoming
Todd V. Royer
Todd V. Royer Indiana University
Gregory B. Lawrence
Gregory B. Lawrence United States Geological Survey
Laurie E. Drinkwater
Laurie E. Drinkwater Cornell University
Myron J. Mitchell
Myron J. Mitchell SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry
Ivan J. Fernandez
Ivan J. Fernandez University of Maine
Robert W. Howarth
Robert W. Howarth Cornell University
Richard Lowrance
Richard Lowrance Agricultural Research Service
Jennifer L. Tank
Jennifer L. Tank University of Notre Dame
Evan H. DeLucia
Evan H. DeLucia University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their knowledge beyond Environmental Sciences, pursuing a bachelors degree in sociology online offers an excellent foundation. This degree complements environmental studies by providing insight into human behavior and societal impacts on ecosystems, which is essential for creating effective environmental policies.

Graduate-level online programs also provide flexible options for advancing your career. For educators or professionals aiming to deepen their expertise, there are eds to edd programs online that allow a smooth transition from a master's to a doctoral degree without traditional barriers.

Many prospective doctoral candidates seek streamlined paths, making doctoral programs online no dissertation attractive options. These programs emphasize practical skills and applied research, enabling students to impact their fields sooner.

Additionally, professionals in related social fields can explore advanced practice with dsw online programs. These programs align well with environmental social work, addressing community health and wellbeing in environmental contexts.

Best Scientists Citing Mark B. David

Trending Scientists