World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 35 9746 9119 465 458 93 6880

Veronika Engert publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Veronika Engert between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Veronika Engert published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 6.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 39 publications in 2024. 56 of the 156 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 39. Peak 39 publications in 2024. 2002: 3 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 4 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 16 publications 2024: 39 publications 2025: 17 publications
2002 2025

156 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Veronika Engert: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 3
2003 2
2004 2
2005 3
2006 0
2007 0
2008 2
2009 6
2010 4
2011 2
2012 1
2013 4
2014 6
2015 6
2016 3
2017 3
2018 4
2019 12
2020 4
2021 11
2022 6
2023 16
2024 39
2025 17
Total 156
Download as CSV

Veronika Engert publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Veronika Engert sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 93 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713 93
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Veronika Engert D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Veronika Engert sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671 35
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Veronika Engert is affiliated with the Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of psychology and neuroscience, with a particular emphasis on clinical psychology and behavioral neuroscience. The scientist's work covers various subfields including experimental and cognitive psychology, social psychology, and cognitive neuroscience.

The main topics addressed in their research include stress responses and cortisol, mindfulness and compassion interventions, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, cognitive processes, resilience and mental health, tryptophan and brain disorders, as well as migration, health, and trauma.

Frequent publication venues for Engert's work are:

  • Psychoneuroendocrinology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Comprehensive Psychoneuroendocrinology
  • Scientific Reports
  • Translational Psychiatry

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Engert include:

  • Resilience and personality as predictors of the biological stress load during the first wave of the Covid-19 pandemic in Germany, 2021, Translational Psychiatry
  • Psychosocial Factors in Disease and Treatment-A Call for the Biopsychosocial Model, 2020, JAMA Psychiatry

Frequent co-authors associated with Engert are:

  • Tania Singer
  • Roman Linz
  • Pascal Vrtička
  • Lara Puhlmann
  • Mathilde Gallistl

Best Publications

  • The Montreal Imaging Stress Task : using functional imaging to investigate the effects of perceiving and processing psychosocial stress in the human brain

    Katarina Dedovic;Robert Renwick;Najmeh Khalili Mahani;Veronika Engert

  • The brain and the stress axis: the neural correlates of cortisol regulation in response to stress.

    Katarina Dedovic;Annie Duchesne;Julie Andrews;Veronika Engert;Veronika Engert

  • Deactivation of the Limbic System During Acute Psychosocial Stress: Evidence from Positron Emission Tomography and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies

    Jens C. Pruessner;Katarina Dedovic;Najmeh Khalili-Mahani;Veronika Engert

  • Investigation into the cross-correlation of salivary cortisol and alpha-amylase responses to psychological stress.

    Veronika Engert;Veronika Engert;Susanne Vogel;Simona I. Efanov;Annie Duchesne

  • Neural correlates of processing stressful information: an event-related fMRI study.

    Katarina Dedovic;Miriam Rexroth;Elisabeth Wolff;Annie Duchesne

  • The Role of Sex and Gender Socialization in Stress Reactivity

    Katarina Dedovic;Mehereen Wadiwalla;Veronika Engert;Jens C. Pruessner

  • Cortisol increase in empathic stress is modulated by emotional closeness and observation modality

    Veronika Engert;Franziska Plessow;Franziska Plessow;Robert Miller;Clemens Kirschbaum

  • Stress-induced changes in LPS-induced pro-inflammatory cytokine production in chronic fatigue syndrome.

    Jens Gaab;Nicolas Rohleder;Vera Heitz;Veronika Engert

  • It matters what you practice: differential training effects on subjective experience, behavior, brain and body in the ReSource Project.

    Tania Singer;Veronika Engert

  • Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis reactivity in chronic fatigue syndrome and health under psychological, physiological, and pharmacological stimulation.

    Jens Gaab;Dominik Hüster;Renate Peisen;Veronika Engert

  • Dopaminergic and noradrenergic contributions to functionality in ADHD: the role of methylphenidate.

    Veronika Engert;Jens C Pruessner

  • Specific reduction in cortisol stress reactivity after social but not attention-based mental training

    Veronika Engert;Bethany E. Kok;Ioannis Papassotiriou;George P. Chrousos

  • Stress-induced reduction in hippocampal volume and connectivity with the ventromedial prefrontal cortex are related to maladaptive responses to stressful military service

    Roee Admon;Roee Admon;Dmitry Leykin;Dmitry Leykin;Gad Lubin;Veronika Engert

  • Exploring the Use of Thermal Infrared Imaging in Human Stress Research

    Veronika Engert;Arcangelo Merla;Joshua A. Grant;Daniela Cardone

  • Effects of Soy Lecithin Phosphatidic Acid and Phosphatidylserine Complex (PAS) on the Endocrine and Psychological Responses to Mental Stress

    J. Hellhammer;E. Fries;C. Buss;Veronika Engert

  • Low-dose dexamethasone suppression test in chronic fatigue syndrome and health.

    Jens Gaab;Dominik Hüster;Renate Peisen;Veronika Engert

  • The interaction of acute and chronic stress impairs model-based behavioral control

    Christoph Radenbach;Andrea M.F. Reiter;Veronika Engert;Zsuzsika Sjoerds

  • Differentiating anticipatory from reactive cortisol responses to psychosocial stress

    Veronika Engert;Veronika Engert;Simona I. Efanov;Annie Duchesne;Susanne Vogel

  • Boosting recovery rather than buffering reactivity: Higher stress-induced oxytocin secretion is associated with increased cortisol reactivity and faster vagal recovery after acute psychosocial stress

    Veronika Engert;Anna M. Koester;Antje Riepenhausen;Tania Singer

  • Perceived early-life maternal care and the cortisol response to repeated psychosocial stress

    Veronika Engert;Simona I. Efanov;Katarina Dedovic;Annie Duchesne

  • Cortisol Awakening Response and Hippocampal Volume: Vulnerability for Major Depressive Disorder?

    Katarina Dedovic;Veronika Engert;Annie Duchesne;Sonja Damika Lue

Frequent Co-Authors

Tania Singer
Tania Singer Max Planck Society
Jens C. Pruessner
Jens C. Pruessner University of Konstanz
Ulrike Ehlert
Ulrike Ehlert University of Zurich
Jens Gaab
Jens Gaab University of Basel
George P. Chrousos
George P. Chrousos National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Tobias Stalder
Tobias Stalder University of Siegen
Philipp Kanske
Philipp Kanske TU Dresden
Boris C. Bernhardt
Boris C. Bernhardt Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Claudia Buss
Claudia Buss University of California, Irvine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees can open doors to a range of promising and flexible career paths. With the rising demand for mental health professionals, behavioral specialists, and human resources experts, an online psychology degree is a practical starting point. Many accredited universities in the USA now offer affordable online programs, making psychology education more accessible to students nationwide.

Cost is a top concern for many learners. Those searching for the Colorado cheapest online psychology bachelor's degree will find reputable options with low tuition. Students in the Southeast may prefer affordable online psychology bachelor's programs in Florida or the cheapest online psychology bachelor's in Georgia. Meanwhile, the Midwest boasts several colleges with the most affordable online bachelor's in psychology degree programs in Minnesota.

Graduates can pursue roles in counseling, social work, organizational psychology, or advance to graduate studies. Choosing the right online degree ensures not only affordability but also flexibility and access to diverse career pathways in psychology and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Veronika Engert

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles