World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Business and Management
USA
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Business and Management

D-Index
83
Citations
228517
World Ranking
134
National Ranking
69

Economics and Finance

D-Index
83
Citations
232159
World Ranking
228
National Ranking
168

David F. Larcker publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David F. Larcker sits on this spectrum.

35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientists 435 publications: 1 scientists 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35 publications 436+

This scientist: 278 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

David F. Larcker D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David F. Larcker sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Business and Management in United States Leader Award
  • 2024 - Research.com Business and Management in United States Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Business and Management in United States Leader Award
  • Fellow of the Financial Institutions Center (FIC)
  • Fellow of the Financial Institutions Center (FIC)
  • Fellow of the Financial Institutions Center (FIC)
  • Fellow of the Financial Institutions Center (FIC)
  • Fellow of the Financial Institutions Center (FIC)
  • Fellow of the Financial Institutions Center (FIC)
  • Fellow of the Financial Institutions Center (FIC)
  • Fellow of the Financial Institutions Center (FIC)
  • Fellow of the Financial Institutions Center (FIC)
  • Fellow of the Financial Institutions Center (FIC)

Overview

David F. Larcker is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Business, Management, and Accounting, with a substantial body of work in various subfields including Accounting, Strategy and Management, Economics and Econometrics, Gender Studies, and Marketing.

Their main research topics cover a wide range of areas related to Corporate Finance and Governance, Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance, Advanced Causal Inference Techniques, Healthcare Policy and Management, Accounting and Organizational Management, Gender Diversity and Inequality, and Securities Regulation and Market Practices.

David F. Larcker has contributed extensively to several academic journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Journal of Accounting and Economics
  • Journal of Accounting Research
  • Journal of Financial Economics
  • The Journal of Finance

Their recent papers include:

  • How much should we trust staggered difference-in-differences estimates? (2022, Journal of Financial Economics)
  • How Much Should We Trust Staggered Difference-In-Differences Estimates? (2021, SSRN Electronic Journal)
  • Where's the greenium? (2020, Journal of Accounting and Economics)
  • Political Connections and the Informativeness of Insider Trades (2020, The Journal of Finance)
  • Non-Answers During Conference Calls (2021, Journal of Accounting Research)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with David F. Larcker are Brian Tayan, Edward M. Watts, Ian D. Gow, Anastasia A. Zakolyukina, and John D. Kepler. These collaborations highlight a consistent engagement with scholars active in related disciplines.

David F. Larcker has been recognized as a Fellow of the Financial Institutions Center (FIC), an affiliation that underlines their involvement in financial institutions research.

Best Publications

  • Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error

    Claes Fornell;David F. Larcker

  • Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error

    Unknown

  • Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics

    Unknown

  • Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics:

    Claes Fornell;David F. Larcker

  • Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation, and firm performance

    John E. Core;Robert W. Holthausen;David F. Larcker

  • On the use of instrumental variables in accounting research

    David F. Larcker;Tjomme O. Rusticus

  • Are nonfinancial measures leading indicators of financial performance? An analysis of customer satisfaction

    Christopher D. Ittner;David F. Larcker

  • How much should we trust staggered difference-in-differences estimates?

    Unknown

  • Innovations in Performance Measurement: Trends and Research Implications

    Christopher D. Ittner;David F. Larcker

  • Performance implications of strategic performance measurement in financial services firms

    Christopher D Ittner;David F Larcker;Taylor Randall

  • Corporate Governance, Accounting Outcomes, and Organizational Performance

    David F. Larcker;Scott A. Richardson;I˙rem Tuna

  • Annual bonus schemes and the manipulation of earnings

    Robert W. Holthausen;David F. Larcker;Richard G. Sloan

  • Assessing empirical research in managerial accounting: a value-based management perspective

    Christopher D Ittner;David F Larcker

  • Coming up short on nonfinancial performance measurement.

    Christopher D Ittner;David F Larcker

  • An Analysis of the Use of Accounting and Market Measures of Performance in Executive Compensation Contracts

    Richard A. Lambert;David F. Larcker

  • Executive Equity Compensation and Incentives: A Survey

    John E. Core;Wayne R. Guay;David F. Larcker

  • Subjectivity and the Weighting of Performance Measures: Evidence from a Balanced Scorecard

    Christopher D. Ittner;David F. Larcker;Marshall W. Meyer

  • Fees Paid to Audit Firms, Accrual Choices, and Corporate Governance

    David F. Larcker;Scott A. Richardson

  • The Incentives for Tax Planning

    Christopher S. Armstrong;Jennifer L. Blouin;David F. Larcker

  • The power of the pen and executive compensation.

    John E Core;Wayne R Guay;David F Larcker

  • Corporate governance, incentives, and tax avoidance☆

    Christopher S. Armstrong;Jennifer L. Blouin;Alan D. Jagolinzer;David F. Larcker

  • Chief Executive Officer Equity Incentives and Accounting Irregularities

    Christopher S. Armstrong;Alan D. Jagolinzer;David F. Larcker

  • STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS WITH UNOBSERVABLE VARIABLES AND MEASUREMENT ERROR

    Unknown

  • Portfolio Considerations in Valuing Executive Compensation

    Richard A. Lamber;David F. Larcker;Robert E. Verrecchia

  • Corporate Governance, Accounting Outcomes, and Organizational Performance

    David F. Larcker;Scott A. Richardson;A. Irem Tuna

  • Empirical Research in Managerial Accounting: A Value-Based Management Perspective

    Christopher D. Ittner;David F. Larcker

Frequent Co-Authors

Christopher D. Ittner
Christopher D. Ittner University of Pennsylvania
Richard A. Lambert
Richard A. Lambert University of Pennsylvania
Scott A. Richardson
Scott A. Richardson London Business School
Wayne R. Guay
Wayne R. Guay University of Pennsylvania
Claes Fornell
Claes Fornell University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Steven N. Kaplan
Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago
Richard G. Sloan
Richard G. Sloan University of Southern California
Lawrence A. Gordon
Lawrence A. Gordon University of Maryland, College Park
Richard P. Bagozzi
Richard P. Bagozzi University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring business and management studies in the USA also opens doors to a variety of specialized online degrees and streamlined pathways. Many students opt for flexible learning options, including fast track programs designed to help you earn your degree in less time. These fast track programs are particularly popular with working professionals and those looking to advance their careers efficiently.

If you're interested in the rapidly growing construction sector, a 2 year construction management degree online offers a targeted, accelerated option for entering this dynamic field. Healthcare is another thriving industry; pursuing an online healthcare management degree can prepare you for leadership roles in hospitals, clinics, and health organizations.

Choosing the right institution is also vital to your success. Many students seek out online business colleges that balance affordability with quality, ensuring that your investment in education offers solid returns. These flexible programs make it easier than ever to align your studies with your career ambitions.

Best Scientists Citing David F. Larcker

Trending Scientists