World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
37
Citations
5228
World Ranking
10845
National Ranking
4515

Jacob Chakareski publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jacob Chakareski sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 177 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Jacob Chakareski D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jacob Chakareski sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jacob Chakareski is affiliated with the New Jersey Institute of Technology in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Computer Science and Engineering, with significant contributions to the subfields of Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Computer Networks and Communications, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Signal Processing, and Aerospace Engineering.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Image and Video Quality Assessment
  • Video Coding and Compression Technologies
  • UAV Applications and Optimization
  • Telecommunications and Broadcasting Technologies
  • Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
  • Caching and Content Delivery
  • Image Enhancement Techniques

Chakareski has authored numerous papers published in a variety of academic venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Transactions on Multimedia
  • IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology
  • IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
  • IEEE Signal Processing Magazine

Recent notable papers by Chakareski encompass:

  • "Viewport-Adaptive Scalable Multi-User Virtual Reality Mobile-Edge Streaming," 2020, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
  • "A review of AI-enabled routing protocols for UAV networks: Trends, challenges, and future outlook," 2022, Ad Hoc Networks
  • "UAV-Assisted Edge Computing and Streaming for Wireless Virtual Reality: Analysis, Algorithm Design, and Performance Guarantees," 2022, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology
  • "Deep Transfer Learning for Automated Intestinal Bleeding Detection in Capsule Endoscopy Imaging," 2021, Journal of Digital Imaging
  • "mmWave Networking and Edge Computing for Scalable 360° Video Multi-User Virtual Reality," 2022, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing

Chakareski collaborates frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Mahmudur Khan
  • Nicholas Mastronarde
  • Mohammad Hajiesmaili
  • Ramesh K. Sitaraman
  • Nikhilesh Sharma

Best Publications

  • Layered coding vs. multiple descriptions for video streaming over multiple paths

    J. Chakareski;S. Han;B. Girod

  • Viewport-adaptive navigable 360-degree video delivery

    Xavier Corbillon;Gwendal Simon;Alisa Devlic;Jacob Chakareski

  • A Review of AI-enabled Routing Protocols for UAV Networks: Trends, Challenges, and Future Outlook.

    Arnau Rovira-Sugranes;Fatemeh Afghah;Jacob Chakareski;Abolfazl Razi

  • Application layer error-correction coding for rate-distortion optimized streaming to wireless clients

    J. Chakareski;P.A. Chou

  • Rate-distortion optimized distributed packet scheduling of multiple video streams over shared communication resources

    J. Chakareski;P. Frossard

  • Joint Caching, Routing, and Channel Assignment for Collaborative Small-Cell Cellular Networks

    Abdallah Khreishah;Jacob Chakareski;Ammar Gharaibeh

  • VR/AR Immersive Communication: Caching, Edge Computing, and Transmission Trade-Offs

    Jacob Chakareski

  • System and method for videoconferencing using scalable video coding and compositing scalable video conferencing servers

    Alexandros Eleftheriadis;Ofer Shapiro;Thomas Wiegand;Jacob Chakareski

  • On the continuous coverage problem for a swarm of UAVs

    Hazim Shakhatreh;Abdallah Khreishah;Jacob Chakareski;Haythem Bany Salameh

  • Rate-distortion optimized packet scheduling and routing for media streaming with path diversity

    J. Chakareski;B. Girod

  • Enabling adaptive video streaming in P2P systems [Peer-to-Peer Multimedia Streaming]

    D. Jurca;J. Chakareski;J.-P. Wagner;P. Frossard

  • Rate-distortion hint tracks for adaptive video streaming

    J. Chakareski;J.G. Apostolopoulos;S. Wee;W. Tan

  • Streaming of Scalable Video from Multiple Servers using Rateless Codes

    Jean-paul Wagner;Jacob Chakareski;Pascal Frossard

  • Optimal Set of 360-Degree Videos for Viewport-Adaptive Streaming

    Xavier Corbillon;Alisa Devlic;Gwendal Simon;Jacob Chakareski

  • System and method for the control of the transmission rate in packet-based digital communications

    Jacob Chakareski;Roi Sasson;Alexandros Eleftheriadis

  • Wildfire Monitoring in Remote Areas using Autonomous Unmanned Aerial Vehicles

    Fatemeh Afghah;Abolfazl Razi;Jacob Chakareski;Jonathan Ashdown

  • UAV-Assisted Edge Computing and Streaming for Wireless Virtual Reality: Analysis, Algorithm Design, and Performance Guarantees

    Unknown

  • An Energy Efficient Framework for UAV-Assisted Millimeter Wave 5G Heterogeneous Cellular Networks

    Jacob Chakareski;Syed Naqvi;Nicholas Mastronarde;Jie Xu

  • Advances in Network-adaptive Video Streaming

    Bernd Girod;Jacob Chakareski;Mark Kalman;Yi J. Liang

  • Prioritized Distributed Video Delivery With Randomized Network Coding

    N. Thomos;J. Chakareski;P. Frossard

  • UAV-IoT for Next Generation Virtual Reality

    Jacob Chakareski

  • Collaborative caching for multicell-coordinated systems

    Abdallah Khreishah;Jacob Chakareski

Frequent Co-Authors

Pascal Frossard
Pascal Frossard École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Bernd Girod
Bernd Girod Stanford University
Abdallah Khreishah
Abdallah Khreishah New Jersey Institute of Technology
Gwendal Simon
Gwendal Simon Synamedia
Philip A. Chou
Philip A. Chou Google (United States)
Vladimir Stankovic
Vladimir Stankovic University of Strathclyde
Gene Cheung
Gene Cheung York University
Issa Khalil
Issa Khalil Hamad bin Khalifa University
John G. Apostolopoulos
John G. Apostolopoulos Cisco Systems (United States)
Petar Popovski
Petar Popovski Aalborg University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As technology rapidly evolves, computer science students have access to diverse online degrees and career advancement options. Exploring specialized fields like data science degrees can unlock high-demand skills in analytics, artificial intelligence, and big data.

For those looking to blend hardware and software expertise, pursuing an online master’s in electrical engineering degree offers a flexible path to deeper technical knowledge and leadership roles.

If you’re looking for a shorter commitment, certificate programs that pay well can help you quickly enter lucrative tech fields. These certifications focus on targeted job skills and often require much less time to complete than a traditional degree.

Finally, those wanting to accelerate their academic journey might consider one of the shortest masters degree programs online. These intensive formats let you fast-track your credentials and career potential.

By considering these related online options, you can strategically enhance your skills and open doors to rewarding paths in tech.

Best Scientists Citing Jacob Chakareski

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles