World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
39
Citations
16086
World Ranking
8213
National Ranking
2925

Edward R. Long publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edward R. Long sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 99 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Edward R. Long D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edward R. Long sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Edward R. Long was affiliated with the Washington Department of Ecology in the United States. Their research spanned multiple fields including Medicine and Chemistry, with a focus on subfields such as Epidemiology, Organic Chemistry, Genetics, Molecular Biology, and Hematology.

Their research topics involved a range of areas, including:

  • Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
  • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Iron Metabolism and Disorders
  • Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
  • Elbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment
  • Bone fractures and treatments
  • Virus-based gene therapy research

Among the recent papers published by Edward R. Long were:

  • In vitro and in vivo induction of fetal hemoglobin with a reversible and selective DNMT1 inhibitor, 2020, Haematologica
  • Infection Rate in Type I Open Distal Radius Fractures Surgically Treated >24 Hours Post-Injury: A Comparison Study, 2022, Hand
  • Combination treatment of a PAPD5/7 inhibitor with an antisense oligonucleotide bepirovirsen with concurrent dosing shows additive HBsAg decreases in the AAV-HBV mouse model, 2022, Journal of Hepatology
  • Photoinduced Formal Intermolecular Ene-Yne Metathesis: Regioselective Synthesis of Chromene Derivatives via an Electron Donor-Acceptor Complex, 2025, Organic Letters

The frequent coauthors who collaborated with Edward R. Long included:

  • Aidan G. Gilmartin
  • Arthur Groy
  • Elizabeth R. Gore
  • Charity Atkins
  • Monica N. Montoute

Their work was published in various academic venues, reflecting the diversity of their research interests. These venues included:

  • Haematologica
  • Hand
  • Journal of Hepatology
  • Organic Letters

Best Publications

  • Incidence of adverse biological effects within ranges of chemical concentrations in marine and estuarine sediments

    Edward R. Long;Donald D. Macdonald;Sherri L. Smith;Fred D. Calder

  • Development and evaluation of sediment quality guidelines for Florida coastal waters.

    Donald D. Macdonald;R. Scott Carr;Fred D. Calder;Edward R. Long

  • Predicting toxicity in marine sediments with numerical sediment quality guidelines

    Edward R. Long;L. Jay Field;Donald D. MacDonald

  • Recommended Uses of Empirically Derived, Sediment Quality Guidelines for Marine and Estuarine Ecosystems

    Unknown

  • The potential for biological effects of sediment-sorbed contaminants tested in the National Status and Trends Program

    Unknown

  • Calculation and Uses of Mean Sediment Quality Guideline Quotients: A Critical Review

    Edward R Long;Christopher G Ingersoll;Donald D MacDonald

  • A Sediment Quality Triad: Measures of sediment contamination, toxicity and infaunal community composition in Puget Sound

    Edward R Long;Peter M Chapman

  • Classifying probabilities of acute toxicity in marine sediments with empirically derived sediment quality guidelines

    Edward R. Long;Donald D. MacDonald;Corinne G. Severn;Carolyn B. Hong

  • Metallic and organic contaminants in sediments of Sydney Harbour, Australia and vicinity-- a chemical dataset for evaluating sediment quality guidelines.

    Stephanie McCready;Gavin F. Birch;Edward R. Long

  • Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment effect concentrations for polychlorinated biphenyls†

    Donald D. MacDonald;Lisa M. Dipinto;Jay Field;Christopher G. Ingersoll

  • Sediment quality assessment studies of Tampa bay, Florida

    Scott R. Carr;Duane C. Chapman;Edward R. Long;Herbert L. Windom

  • The use of bioassays as part of a comprehensive approach to marine pollution assessment

    Peter M Chapman;Edward R Long

  • Estimates of the Spatial Extent of Sediment Toxicity in Major U.S. Estuaries

    Edward R. Long;Andrew Robertson;Douglas A. Wolfe;Jawed Hameedi

  • An evaluation of methods for calculating mean sediment quality guideline quotients as indicators of contamination and acute toxicity to amphipods by chemical mixtures.

    Russell Fairey;Edward R. Long;Cassandra A. Roberts;Brian S. Anderson

  • General guidelines for using the sediment quality triad

    Peter M. Chapman;Brian Anderson;Scott Carr;Virginia Engle

  • A survey of oysters Crassostrea virginica from Tampa Bay, Florida: associations of internal defense measurements with contaminant burdens.

    William S Fisher;Leah M Oliver;James T Winstead;Edward R Long

  • Comparative evaluation of five toxicity tests with sediments from san francisco bay and tomales bay, california

    Edward R. Long;Michael F. Buchman;Steven M. Bay;Ronald J. Breteler

  • Development, Evaluation, and Application of Sediment Quality Targets for Assessing and Managing Contaminated Sediments in Tampa Bay, Florida

    D. D. MacDonald;R. S. Carr;D. Eckenrod;H. Greening

  • Relationships between tissue contaminants and defense-related characteristics of oysters (Crassostrea virginica) from five Florida bays.

    Leah M Oliver;William S Fisher;James T Winstead;Becky L Hemmer

  • Ranges in chemical concentrations in sediments associated with adverse biological effects

    Edward R Long

  • Relationships between acute sediment toxicity in laboratory tests and abundance and diversity of benthic infauna in marine sediments: a review.

    Edward R. Long;Carolyn B. Hong;Corinne G. Severn

  • Rapid toxicity assessment of sediments from estuarine ecosystems: A new tandem in vitro testing approach

    B. Thomas Johnson;Edward R. Long

Frequent Co-Authors

Gavin F. Birch
Gavin F. Birch University of Sydney
Peter M. Chapman
Peter M. Chapman Golder Associates (Canada)
Christopher G. Ingersoll
Christopher G. Ingersoll United States Geological Survey
Brian S. Anderson
Brian S. Anderson University of California, Davis
Bryn M. Phillips
Bryn M. Phillips University of California, Davis
G. Thomas Chandler
G. Thomas Chandler University of South Carolina
Geoffrey I. Scott
Geoffrey I. Scott University of South Carolina
Bob J. Presley
Bob J. Presley Texas A&M University
Terry L. Wade
Terry L. Wade Texas A&M University
Herbert L. Windom
Herbert L. Windom Skidaway Institute of Oceanography

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Programs like low cost online general studies degree options offer affordable paths for those seeking a broad academic foundation before specializing.

Some learners may prefer an easy bachelor’s degree to balance studies with work or personal commitments. These programs focus on accessibility and manageable coursework while still providing valuable skills applicable in environmental fields.

More specialized degrees such as a geology online degree provide in-depth knowledge of Earth systems, crucial for careers in environmental consulting, resource management, or research. These programs often include practical elements that can be completed remotely.

Additionally, the best GIS undergraduate programs prepare students to work with Geographic Information Systems, essential tools for mapping and analyzing environmental data. GIS expertise is highly sought after in climate science, urban planning, and conservation sectors.

By considering these varied educational paths, students can tailor their studies to align with their interests and career goals in the expanding field of Environmental Sciences.

Learn more about affordable and specialized programs such as low cost online general studies degree, easy bachelor's degree, geology online degree, and best gis undergraduate programs.

Best Scientists Citing Edward R. Long

Recently Published Articles