World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
44
Citations
5295
World Ranking
6887
National Ranking
2450

G. Thomas Chandler publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where G. Thomas Chandler sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 104 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

G. Thomas Chandler D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where G. Thomas Chandler sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

G. Thomas Chandler is a researcher affiliated with the University of South Carolina in the United States. Their work spans multiple fields within the scientific domain, focusing mainly on Materials Science, Environmental Science, and Chemistry. These fields encompass a range of specialized subfields including Materials Chemistry, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, and Electrochemistry.

Their research interests involve several main topics, with an emphasis on the synthesis and applications of nanoparticles as well as their environmental and toxicological implications. Additionally, their work covers electrochemical analysis and applications, reflecting a multi-disciplinary approach to scientific inquiry.

Their recent publication record features research that addresses the interaction of nanoparticles with biological systems and environmental settings. Specifically, one notable paper, published in 2021 in the journal Environmental Science Nano, is titled Particle size determines the accumulation of platinum nanoparticles in the estuarine amphipod, Leptocheirus plumulosus. This research explores how the size of platinum nanoparticles impacts their accumulation in a specific estuarine organism, providing insights into nanomaterial behavior within ecological contexts.

Frequent collaborators in their research include Mithun Sikder, Emily Eudy, Bo Cai, and Mohammed Baalousha, indicating a collaborative network that supports multidisciplinary studies in environmental and material sciences.

The publication venues for their work are concentrated in journals such as Environmental Science Nano, which aligns with the environmental and nanomaterials focus observed across their body of research.

  • Particle size determines the accumulation of platinum nanoparticles in the estuarine amphipod, Leptocheirus plumulosus (2021, Environmental Science Nano)

  • Mithun Sikder
  • Emily Eudy
  • Bo Cai
  • Mohammed Baalousha

  • Environmental Science Nano

  • Materials Science
  • Environmental Science
  • Chemistry

  • Materials Chemistry
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
  • Electrochemistry

  • Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications
  • Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
  • Electrochemical Analysis and Applications

Best Publications

  • Life-Cycle Effects of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes (SWNTs) on an Estuarine Meiobenthic Copepod†

    Ryan C Templeton;P Lee Ferguson;Kate M Washburn;Wally A Scrivens

  • Meiofaunal colonization of azoic estuarine sediment in Louisiana: Mechanisms of dispersal

    G.Thomas Chandler;John W. Fleeger

  • AusTraits, a curated plant trait database for the Australian flora.

    Daniel Falster;Rachael Gallagher;Rachael Gallagher;Elizabeth H. Wenk;Ian J. Wright

  • Influence of sediment-amendment with single-walled carbon nanotubes and diesel soot on bioaccumulation of hydrophobic organic contaminants by benthic invertebrates.

    P. Lee Ferguson;G. Thomas Chandler;Ryan C. Templeton;Amanda DeMarco

  • A rapid approach for measuring silver nanoparticle concentration and dissolution in seawater by UV-Vis.

    Mithun Sikder;Jamie R. Lead;G. Thomas Chandler;Mohammed Baalousha

  • Recent advances in understanding Apiales and a revised classification

    G.M. Plunkett;G.T. Chandler;G.T. Chandler;P.P. Lowry;S.M. Pinney

  • Fipronil effects on estuarine copepod (Amphiascus tenuiremis) development, fertility, and reproduction: A rapid life‐cycle assay in 96‐well microplate format

    G. Thomas Chandler;Tawnya L. Cary;David C. Volz;Spencer S. Walse

  • Assessment of risk reduction strategies for the management of agricultural nonpoint source pesticide runoff in estuarine ecosystems.

    G. I. Scott;M. H. Fulton;D. W. Moore;E. F. Wirth

  • USE OF THE FLUORESCENT CALCITE MARKER CALCEIN TO LABEL FORAMINIFERAL TESTS

    Joan M. Bernhard;Jessica K. Blanks;Christopher J. Hintz;G. Thomas Chandler

  • Evolution in Apiales: nuclear and chloroplast markers together in (almost) perfect harmony

    G. T. Chandler;G. M. Plunkett

  • High-density culture of meiobenthic harpacticoid copepods within a muddy sediment substrate

    G. Thomas Chandler

  • Meiofauna responses to an experimental oil spill in a Louisiana salt marsh

    JW Fleeger;GT Chandler

  • Aqueous-, pore-water-, and sediment-phase cadmium: Toxicity relationships for a meiobenthic copepod

    Andrew S. Green;G. Thomas Chandler;Elizabeth R. Blood

  • Bioavailability of particle-associated silver, cadmium, and zinc to the estuarine amphipod Leptocheirus plumulosus through dietary ingestion

    Christian E. Schlekat;Alan W. Decho;G. Thomas Chandler

  • Lethal and sublethal effects of the sediment‐associated PCB aroclor 1254 on a meiobenthic copepod

    Lisa M. Dipinto;Bruce C. Coull;G. Thomas Chandler

  • Effects of tidal currents on meiofauna densities in vegetated salt marsh sediments

    J. W. Fleeger;G. T. Chandler;G. R. Fitzhugh;F. E. Phillips

  • Individual to population level effects of South Louisiana crude oil water accommodated hydrocarbon fraction (WAF) on a marine meiobenthic copepod

    Adriana C. Bejarano;G. Thomas Chandler;Lijian He;Bruce C. Coull

  • Trace/minor element:calcium ratios in cultured benthic foraminifera. Part II: Ontogenetic variation

    Christopher J. Hintz;Timothy J. Shaw;Joan M. Bernhard;G. Thomas Chandler

  • Toxicological studies in tropical ecosystems: an ecotoxicological risk assessment of pesticide runoff in South Florida estuarine ecosystems.

    Scott Gi;Fulton Mh;Wirth Ef;Chandler Gt

  • Characterization and Quantitative Analysis of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes in the Aquatic Environment Using Near-Infrared Fluorescence Spectroscopy

    Ariette Schierz;Ashley N. Parks;Kathryn M. Washburn;G. Thomas Chandler

  • Effects of sediment‐bound endosulfan on survival, reproduction and larval settlement of meiobenthic polychaetes and copepods

    G. Thomas Chandler;Geoffrey I. Scott

  • Bioaccumulation and toxicity of single‐walled carbon nanotubes to benthic organisms at the base of the marine food chain

    Ashley N. Parks;Lisa M. Portis;P. Ariette Schierz;Kate M. Washburn

  • Phenylpyrazole insecticide fipronil induces male infertility in the estuarine meiobenthic crustacean Amphiascus tenuiremis.

    Tawnya L. Cary;G. Thomas Chandler;David C. Volz;Spencer S. Walse

Frequent Co-Authors

P. Lee Ferguson
P. Lee Ferguson Duke University
Bruce C. Coull
Bruce C. Coull University of South Carolina
Alan W. Decho
Alan W. Decho University of South Carolina
Joan M. Bernhard
Joan M. Bernhard Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
Daniel C. McCorkle
Daniel C. McCorkle Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
Geoffrey I. Scott
Geoffrey I. Scott University of South Carolina
Mohammed Baalousha
Mohammed Baalousha University of South Carolina
Jamie R. Lead
Jamie R. Lead University of South Carolina
Robert M. Burgess
Robert M. Burgess Environmental Protection Agency
Edward R. Long
Edward R. Long Washington Department of Ecology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Environmental Sciences in the USA often leads to diverse interdisciplinary opportunities. Many students complement their studies with specialized programs that enhance their expertise and career prospects. For example, pursuing a geologist degree online provides focused knowledge on Earth's physical structure and processes, essential for careers in resource management and environmental consulting.

Another growing field is Geographic Information Systems (GIS), which plays a critical role in environmental data analysis and decision-making. Enrolling in a reputable gis degree program can equip students with geographic data visualization and spatial analysis skills highly sought after in urban planning and conservation.

For those interested in policy and administration aspects, pursuing one of the best online masters in public administration helps bridge environmental science with effective governance and public sector leadership roles.

Finally, combining environmental studies with social perspectives is increasingly valuable. Online programs like online sociology bachelor programs offer insights into human behavior and societal impacts, crucial for sustainable development and environmental justice careers.

Best Scientists Citing G. Thomas Chandler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles