World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
100
Citations
50462
World Ranking
749
National Ranking
417

Psychology

D-Index
102
Citations
51343
World Ranking
562
National Ranking
353

Marc D. Hauser publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marc D. Hauser sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 278 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

Marc D. Hauser D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marc D. Hauser sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 102 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2005 - Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation

Overview

Marc D. Hauser is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States and has contributed to research primarily in the fields of Neuroscience and Psychology. Their work spans various subfields, including Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sensory Systems, Biomedical Engineering, and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

The scientist's research focuses on multiple interconnected topics such as Multisensory Perception and Integration, Neural Dynamics and Brain Function, Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies, Neuroscience and Music Perception, Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring, Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control, and EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces.

Marc D. Hauser has published in a range of scientific venues with frequent publications found in:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Scientific Reports
  • Nature Communications
  • European Journal of Neuroscience
  • Mind Brain and Education

Recent papers include:

  • Automated video-based heart rate tracking for the anesthetized and behaving monkey, 2020, Scientific Reports
  • Socially meaningful visual context either enhances or inhibits vocalisation processing in the macaque brain, 2022, Nature Communications
  • How Early Life Adversity Transforms the Learning Brain, 2020, Mind Brain and Education
  • Macaque claustrum, pulvinar and putative dorsolateral amygdala support the cross-modal association of social audio-visual stimuli based on meaning, 2024, European Journal of Neuroscience
  • Neural correlates of audio-visual integration of socially meaningful information in macaque monkeys, 2021, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Frequent coauthors with whom Marc D. Hauser collaborated include:

  • Mathilda Froesel
  • Suliann Ben Hamed
  • Quentin Goudard
  • Maëva Gacoin
  • Simon Clavagnier

In 2005, Marc D. Hauser was recognized as a Fellow of the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation.

Best Publications

  • The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?

    Marc D. Hauser;Noam Chomsky;W. Tecumseh Fitch

  • Moral Minds: How Nature Designed Our Universal Sense of Right and Wrong

    Marc D. Hauser

  • The Evolution of Communication

    Marc D. Hauser

  • Damage to the prefrontal cortex increases utilitarian moral judgements

    Michael Koenigs;Liane Young;Ralph Adolphs;Ralph Adolphs;Daniel Tranel

  • The Role of Conscious Reasoning and Intuition in Moral Judgment Testing Three Principles of Harm

    Fiery Cushman;Liane Young;Marc Hauser

  • The evolution of the language faculty: Clarifications and implications

    W. Tecumseh Fitch;Marc D. Hauser;Noam Chomsky

  • Processing of complex sounds in the Macaque nonprimary auditory cortex

    Josef P. Rauschecker;Biao Tian;Marc Hauser

  • A Dissociation Between Moral Judgments and Justifications

    Marc D. Hauser;Fiery Cushman;Liane Young;R. Kang-Xing Jin

  • Computational Constraints on Syntactic Processing in a Nonhuman Primate

    W. Tecumseh Fitch;Marc D. Hauser

  • The Representations Underlying Infants' Choice of More: Object Files Versus Analog Magnitudes

    Lisa Feigenson;Susan Carey;Marc Hauser

  • Wild Minds: What Animals Really Think

    Marc D. Hauser

  • The neural basis of the interaction between theory of mind and moral judgment

    Liane Young;Fiery Cushman;Marc Hauser;Rebecca Saxe

  • Language discrimination by human newborns and by cotton-top tamarin monkeys.

    Franck Ramus;Marc D. Hauser;Cory Miller;Dylan Morris

  • Disruption of the right temporoparietal junction with transcranial magnetic stimulation reduces the role of beliefs in moral judgments

    Liane Young;Joan Albert Camprodon;Marc Hauser;Alvaro Pascual-Leone

  • Is there teaching in nonhuman animals

    T M Caro;M D Hauser

  • Serotonin selectively influences moral judgment and behavior through effects on harm aversion

    Molly J. Crockett;Luke Clark;Marc D. Hauser;Trevor W. Robbins

  • Why be nice? Psychological constraints on the evolution of cooperation

    Jeffrey R. Stevens;Marc D. Hauser

  • Does participation in intergroup conflict depend on numerical assessment, range location, or rank for wild chimpanzees?

    Michael L. Wilson;Marc D. Hauser;Richard W. Wrangham

  • Spontaneous number representation in semi–free–ranging rhesus monkeys

    Marc D. Hauser;Susan Carey;Lilan B. Hauser

  • The role of emotion in moral psychology

    Bryce Huebner;Bryce Huebner;Susan Dwyer;Marc D. Hauser

  • Segmentation of the speech stream in a non-human primate: statistical learning in cotton-top tamarins.

    Marc D Hauser;Elissa L Newport;Richard N Aslin

Frequent Co-Authors

Laurie R. Santos
Laurie R. Santos Yale University
W. Tecumseh Fitch
W. Tecumseh Fitch University of Vienna
Liane Young
Liane Young Boston College
Fiery Cushman
Fiery Cushman Harvard University
Susan Carey
Susan Carey Harvard University
Jacques Mehler
Jacques Mehler International School for Advanced Studies
Yale E. Cohen
Yale E. Cohen University of Pennsylvania
Elizabeth S. Spelke
Elizabeth S. Spelke Harvard University
Richard N. Aslin
Richard N. Aslin Yale University
Daniel Tranel
Daniel Tranel University of Iowa

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens doors to a range of online degrees and career pathways, notably in counseling, clinical mental health, and social work. With a growing demand for qualified professionals, more universities in the USA are offering affordable and flexible online programs that allow students to specialize in areas like family therapy, school psychology, and substance abuse counseling.

Cost is a significant factor for many students. Those interested in studying in the Southeast can explore affordable counseling programs in Georgia, while Midwest learners might look into the most affordable counseling degree programs in Illinois or affordable counseling degrees in Indiana.

For those interested in major metropolitan areas, there are several affordable counseling programs in Los Angeles that can prepare graduates for licensure and career opportunities in diverse urban settings.

No matter your preferred location or focus area, numerous online and hybrid options make it possible to access quality, affordable education to launch your psychology or counseling career.

Best Scientists Citing Marc D. Hauser

Trending Scientists