World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Chemistry

D-Index
61
Citations
10286
World Ranking
9474
National Ranking
2660

James E. Bruce publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James E. Bruce sits on this spectrum.

61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 161 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

James E. Bruce D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James E. Bruce sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1997 - Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada Academy of Science

Overview

James E. Bruce is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology as well as Chemistry. Within these broad domains, they have focused extensively on Molecular Biology and Spectroscopy, with additional investigations in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Insect Science, and Computational Theory and Mathematics.

The scientist's work covers a number of specific topics including Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications, Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications, Mitochondrial Function and Pathology, Protein Structure and Dynamics, Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies, Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks, and RNA and Protein Synthesis Mechanisms.

James E. Bruce has contributed to several recent papers:

  • Towards a structurally resolved human protein interaction network, 2023, Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
  • Mitochondrial protein interaction landscape of SS-31, 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Crosslinking mass spectrometry: A link between structural biology and systems biology, 2021, Protein Science
  • Isobaric Quantitative Protein Interaction Reporter Technology for Comparative Interactome Studies, 2020, Analytical Chemistry
  • Quantitative interactome analysis with chemical cross-linking and mass spectrometry, 2021, Current Opinion in Chemical Biology

The scientist has published frequently in the following venues:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Proteome Research
  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
  • Current Biology

Their work involves collaboration with several frequent co-authors such as Andrew Keller, Juan D. Chavez, Anna Bakhtina, Helisa H. Wippel, and Xiaoting Tang.

James E. Bruce was recognized as a Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada in 1997. The citation for this award is from the Academy of Science.

Best Publications

  • Normalization of NAD+ Redox Balance as a Therapy for Heart Failure.

    Chi Fung Lee;Juan D. Chavez;Lorena Garcia-Menendez;Yong Seon Choi

  • Towards a structurally resolved human protein interaction network

    Unknown

  • Probing proteomes using capillary isoelectric focusing-electrospray ionization Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry.

    Pamela K. Jensen;Ljiljana Paša-Tolić;Gordon A. Anderson;Julie A. Horner

  • High-resolution accurate mass measurements of biomolecules using a new electrospray ionization ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometer.

    Brian E. Winger;Steven A. Hofstadler;James E. Bruce;Harold R. Udseth

  • Mass Spectrometry Identifiable Cross-Linking Strategy for Studying Protein−Protein Interactions

    Xiaoting Tang;Gerhard R. Munske;William F. Siems;James E. Bruce

  • High throughput proteome-wide precision measurements of protein expression using mass spectrometry

    Ljiljana Paša-Tolic;Pamela K. Jensen;Gordon A. Anderson;Mary S. Lipton

  • Using Electrospray Ionization FTICR Mass Spectrometry To Study Competitive Binding of Inhibitors to Carbonic Anhydrase

    Xueheng Cheng;Ruidan Chen;James E. Bruce;Brenda L. Schwartz

  • New mass spectrometric methods for the study of noncovalent associations of biopolymers

    Richard D. Smith;James E. Bruce;Qinyuan Wu;Q. Paula Lei

  • Screening derivatized peptide libraries for tight binding inhibitors to carbonic anhydrase II by electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry.

    Jinming Gao;Xueheng Cheng;Ruidan Chen;George B. Sigal

  • Mitochondrial protein interactome elucidated by chemical cross-linking mass spectrometry

    Devin K. Schweppe;Juan D. Chavez;Chi Fung Lee;Arianne Caudal

  • Protein Identification with a Single Accurate Mass of a Cysteine-Containing Peptide and Constrained Database Searching

    David R. Goodlett;James E. Bruce;Gordon A. Anderson;Beate Rist

  • Identification of Protein-Protein Interactions and Topologies in Living Cells with Chemical Cross-linking and Mass Spectrometry

    Haizhen Zhang;Xiaoting Tang;Gerhard R. Munske;Nikola Tolic

  • A new cross-linking strategy: protein interaction reporter (PIR) technology for protein–protein interaction studies

    Xiaoting Tang;James E. Bruce

  • Mitochondrial protein interaction landscape of SS-31

    Juan D. Chavez;Xiaoting Tang;Matthew D. Campbell;Gustavo Reyes

  • Dissociation of tetrameric ions of noncovalent streptavidin complexes formed by electrospray ionization.

    Brenda L. Schwartz;James E. Bruce;Gordon A. Anderson;Steven A. Hofstadler

  • Chemical Crosslinking Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Protein Conformations and Supercomplexes in Heart Tissue

    Juan D. Chavez;Chi Fung Lee;Arianne Caudal;Andrew Keller

  • Accurate mass multiplexed tandem mass spectrometry for high-throughput polypeptide identification from mixtures.

    Christophe Masselon;Gordon A. Anderson;Richard Harkewicz;James E. Bruce

  • In vivo protein interaction network identified with a novel real-time cross-linked peptide identification strategy.

    Chad R. Weisbrod;Juan D. Chavez;Jimmy K. Eng;Li Yang

  • Chemical cross-linking with mass spectrometry: a tool for systems structural biology.

    Juan D Chavez;James E Bruce

  • First Community-Wide, Comparative Cross-Linking Mass Spectrometry Study.

    Claudio Iacobucci;Christine Piotrowski;Ruedi Aebersold;Ruedi Aebersold;Bruno C. Amaral

  • Identification of intrinsic order and disorder in the DNA repair protein XPA

    Lilia M. Iakoucheva;Amy L. Kimzey;Christophe D. Masselon;James E. Bruce

  • Isotope distribution encoded tags for protein identification

    David R. Goodlett;James E. Bruce;Beate Rist;Richard D. Smith

  • Protein Interactions, Post-translational Modifications and Topologies in Human Cells

    Juan D. Chavez;Chad R. Weisbrod;Chunxiang Zheng;Jimmy K. Eng

  • Carbonic Anhydrase-Inhibitor Binding: From Solution to the Gas Phase

    Qinyuan Wu;Jinming Gao;Diane Joseph-McCarthy;George B. Sigal

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard D. Smith
Richard D. Smith Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Gordon A. Anderson
Gordon A. Anderson Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Jimmy K. Eng
Jimmy K. Eng University of Washington
Rong Tian
Rong Tian University of Washington
Ljiljana Paša-Tolić
Ljiljana Paša-Tolić Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory
Pradeep K. Singh
Pradeep K. Singh University of Washington
Colin Manoil
Colin Manoil University of Washington
Stewart M. Gray
Stewart M. Gray Cornell University
Michael J. MacCoss
Michael J. MacCoss University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Chemistry in the USA opens doors to diverse career paths that blend science with practical application. For those interested in legal aspects within scientific fields, pursuing a paralegal studies associate degree can be a valuable foundation. This path offers specialized knowledge in legal procedures, which can complement chemistry expertise in areas like patent law or environmental regulations.

Alternatively, graduates may consider roles that emphasize communication and product knowledge, such as pharmaceutical sales. Understanding chemistry helps in explaining complex products to healthcare professionals, contributing to higher earning potential as detailed in the guide on pharmaceutical sales rep salary.

For those who want to deepen their scientific practice, becoming a pharmacist is a natural progression. This career demands advanced education but offers rewarding salaries and a direct impact on patient care. Comprehensive insights can be found in the resource on how to become a pharmacist salary.

Another specialized route is working as an autopsy technician, where chemistry knowledge supports forensic investigations. If this path interests you, explore the potential compensation and job outlook by reviewing how much do autopsy techs make.

Each of these related degrees and career options highlights the flexibility of a Chemistry background and how it can be tailored to various professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing James E. Bruce

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles