World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
38
Citations
5397
World Ranking
8657
National Ranking
322

Dianne F. Jolley publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dianne F. Jolley sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 128 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Dianne F. Jolley D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dianne F. Jolley sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Dianne F. Jolley is affiliated with the University of Wollongong in Australia and has contributed extensively to the field of Environmental Science. Their primary research focus spans various subfields including Pollution, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Ecology, Water Science and Technology, and Environmental Chemistry.

Their work addresses key topics such as Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology, Heavy Metals in the Environment, Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies, Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts, Water Quality and Pollution Assessment, Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology, and Mercury Impact and Mitigation Studies. These areas reflect a broad engagement with environmental contaminants and their biological effects.

Dianne F. Jolley's recent publications demonstrate a focus on the interaction of heavy metals and dissolved organic matter with aquatic organisms. Recent papers include:

  • Speciation of nickel and its toxicity to Chlorella sp. in the presence of three distinct dissolved organic matter (DOM), 2020, Chemosphere
  • Amelioration of copper toxicity to a tropical freshwater microalga: Effect of natural DOM source and season, 2020, Environmental Pollution
  • Effects of dissolved nickel and nickel-contaminated suspended sediment on the scleractinian coral, Acropora muricata, 2020, Marine Pollution Bulletin
  • Natural organic matter source, concentration, and pH influences the toxicity of zinc to a freshwater microalga, 2022, Environmental Pollution
  • Assessing metal contaminants in Antarctic soils using diffusive gradients in thin-films, 2020, Chemosphere

Their publications appear frequently in the following venues:

  • Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
  • Environmental Pollution
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Chemosphere
  • Environmental Science Processes & Impacts

Frequent collaborators in their research include Darren J. Koppel, Jennifer L. Stauber, Aleicia Holland, Gwilym A. V. Price, and Merrin S. Adams, indicating a network of co-authors contributing substantially to shared research projects.

Best Publications

  • Effect of overlying water pH, dissolved oxygen, salinity and sediment disturbances on metal release and sequestration from metal contaminated marine sediments.

    Clare A. Atkinson;Dianne F. Jolley;Stuart L. Simpson

  • Sensitivity of marine microalgae to copper: The effect of biotic factors on copper adsorption and toxicity

    Jacqueline L. Levy;Jacqueline L. Levy;Jennifer L. Stauber;Jennifer L. Stauber;Dianne F. Jolley

  • Toxicity, biotransformation, and mode of action of arsenic in two freshwater microalgae (Chlorella sp. and Monoraphidium arcuatum)

    Jacqueline L. Levy;Jacqueline L. Levy;Jennifer L. Stauber;Merrin S. Adams;William A. Maher

  • Metal equilibration in laboratory-contaminated (spiked) sediments used for the development of whole-sediment toxicity tests.

    Stuart L. Simpson;Brad M. Angel;Brad M. Angel;Dianne F. Jolley

  • Uptake and internalisation of copper by three marine microalgae: comparison of copper-sensitive and copper-tolerant species.

    Jacqueline L Levy;Brad M Angel;Brad M Angel;Jennifer L Stauber;Wing L Poon

  • New diffusive gradients in a thin film technique for measuring inorganic arsenic and selenium(IV) using a titanium dioxide based adsorbent.

    William W. Bennett;Peter R. Teasdale;Jared G. Panther;David T. Welsh

  • The influence of sediment particle size and organic carbon on toxicity of copper to benthic invertebrates in oxic/suboxic surface sediments

    David Strom;David Strom;Stuart L. Simpson;Graeme E. Batley;Dianne F. Jolley

  • Speciation of dissolved inorganic arsenic by diffusive gradients in thin films: selective binding of AsIII by 3-mercaptopropyl-functionalized silica gel

    William W. Bennett;Peter R. Teasdale;Jared G. Panther;David T. Welsh

  • Oxidation of acid-volatile sulfide in surface sediments increases the release and toxicity of copper to the benthic amphipod Melita plumulosa.

    Stuart L. Simpson;Daniel Ward;Daniel Ward;David Strom;David Strom;Dianne F. Jolley

  • Assessing the Effects of Bioturbation on Metal Bioavailability in Contaminated Sediments by Diffusive Gradients in Thin Films (DGT)

    Elvio D. Amato;Stuart L. Simpson;Timothy M. Remaili;Timothy M. Remaili;David A. Spadaro

  • Investigating Arsenic Speciation and Mobilization in Sediments with DGT and DET: A Mesocosm Evaluation of Oxic-Anoxic Transitions

    William W. Bennett;Peter R. Teasdale;Jared G. Panther;David T. Welsh

  • An assessment of five Australian Polychaetes and Bivalves for use in whole-sediment toxicity tests: toxicity and accumulation of Copper and Zinc from water and sediment

    C. K. King;M. C. Dowse;S. L. Simpson;D. F. Jolley

  • DGT-Induced Copper Flux Predicts Bioaccumulation and Toxicity to Bivalves in Sediments with Varying Properties

    Stuart L. Simpson;Héloïse Yverneau;Héloïse Yverneau;Anne Cremazy;Anne Cremazy;Chad V. Jarolimek

  • Diffusive Gradients in Thin Films Technique Provide Robust Prediction of Metal Bioavailability and Toxicity in Estuarine Sediments

    Elvio D. Amato;Stuart L. Simpson;Chad V. Jarolimek;Dianne F. Jolley

  • Considerations for capping metal-contaminated sediments in dynamic estuarine environments

    Stuart L Simpson;Ian D Pryor;Ben R Mewburn;Graeme E Batley

  • What You Need to Know about Selenium

    Terry Young;Keith Finley;William Adams;John Besser

  • The impact of sediment bioturbation by secondary organisms on metal bioavailability, bioaccumulation and toxicity to target organisms in benthic bioassays: Implications for sediment quality assessment.

    Timothy M. Remaili;Timothy M. Remaili;Stuart L. Simpson;Elvio D. Amato;Elvio D. Amato;David A. Spadaro

  • Copper and zinc tolerance of two tropical microalgae after copper acclimation.

    Hilary L. Johnson;Hilary L. Johnson;Jenny L. Stauber;Merrin S. Adams;Dianne F. Jolley

  • Differences in soft-sediment macrobenthic assemblages invaded by Caulerpa taxifolia compared to uninvaded habitats

    Justin G. McKinnon;Paul E. Gribben;Andrew R. Davis;Dianne F. Jolley

  • Toxicity of dissolved and precipitated aluminium to marine diatoms

    Megan L. Gillmore;Megan L. Gillmore;Lisa A. Golding;Brad M. Angel;Merrin S. Adams

  • Selenium contamination, redistribution and remobilisation in sediments of Lake Macquarie, NSW

    G.M Peters;W.A Maher;D Jolley;B.I Carroll

Frequent Co-Authors

Stuart L. Simpson
Stuart L. Simpson Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Jennifer L. Stauber
Jennifer L. Stauber Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Peter R. Teasdale
Peter R. Teasdale University of South Australia
David T. Welsh
David T. Welsh Griffith University
William A. Maher
William A. Maher University of Canberra
Philippe Soudant
Philippe Soudant French Research Institute for Exploitation of the Sea
Sharon A. Robinson
Sharon A. Robinson University of Wollongong
Heath Ecroyd
Heath Ecroyd University of Wollongong
Jason M. Unrine
Jason M. Unrine University of Kentucky

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degree options can open diverse career opportunities. Pursuing an online general studies degree affordable program offers a flexible and budget-friendly pathway to build foundational knowledge, especially for those balancing work and studies.

If you seek a degree that combines depth with a manageable workload, some of the easy bachelor degrees could complement your environmental study goals. These programs focus on streamlined curricula without compromising essential skills.

For a more specialized focus, an online geology degree is closely aligned with environmental science topics such as earth systems and natural resource management. This degree enhances your understanding of the physical environment and geological processes.

Additionally, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) skills are highly valued in environmental careers. Many look to the best gis schools for advanced training in mapping and spatial analysis technologies, essential tools for today’s environmental professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Dianne F. Jolley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles