World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
50
Citations
9342
World Ranking
4988
National Ranking
175

Jennifer L. Stauber publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jennifer L. Stauber sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 159 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Jennifer L. Stauber D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jennifer L. Stauber sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Growth‐inhibiting effects of 12 antibacterial agents and their mixtures on the freshwater microalga Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata

    Li-Hua Yang;Guang-Guo Ying;Hao-Chang Su;Jennifer L. Stauber

  • Mechanism of toxicity of ionic copper and copper complexes to algae

    Unknown

  • pH-dependent toxicity of copper and uranium to a tropical freshwater alga (Chlorella sp.).

    Natasha M. Franklin;Jennifer L. Stauber;Scott J. Markich;Richard P. Lim

  • Handbook for sediment quality assessment

    S.L. Simpson;G.E. Batley;A.A. Chariton;J.L. Stauber

  • Sensitivity of marine microalgae to copper: The effect of biotic factors on copper adsorption and toxicity

    Jacqueline L. Levy;Jacqueline L. Levy;Jennifer L. Stauber;Jennifer L. Stauber;Dianne F. Jolley

  • Toxicity of metal mixtures to a tropical freshwater alga (Chlorella sp): the effect of interactions between copper, cadmium, and zinc on metal cell binding and uptake.

    Natasha M. Franklin;Natasha M. Franklin;Jennifer L. Stauber;Richard P. Lim;Peter Petocz

  • Toxicity, biotransformation, and mode of action of arsenic in two freshwater microalgae (Chlorella sp. and Monoraphidium arcuatum)

    Jacqueline L. Levy;Jacqueline L. Levy;Jennifer L. Stauber;Merrin S. Adams;William A. Maher

  • Development of flow cytometry-based algal bioassays for assessing toxicity of copper in natural waters.

    Natasha M. Franklin;Natasha M. Franklin;Jennifer L. Stauber;Richard P. Lim

  • PHOTOSYNTHETIC PIGMENTS IN FIFTY‐ONE SPECIES OF MARINE DIATOMS

    Unknown

  • The effect of pH on the uptake and toxicity of copper and zinc in a tropical freshwater alga (Chlorella sp.).

    Unknown

  • Effect of initial cell density on the bioavailability and toxicity of copper in microalgal bioassays

    Natasha M. Franklin;Natasha M. Franklin;Jennifer L. Stauber;Simon C. Apte;Richard P. Lim

  • Occurrence and a screening-level risk assessment of human pharmaceuticals in the Pearl River system, South China

    Jian Liang Zhao;Guang Guo Ying;You Sheng Liu;Feng Chen

  • Speciation and Bioavailability of Trace Metals in Water: Progress Since 1982

    Graeme E. Batley;Simon C. Apte;Jennifer L. Stauber

  • Uptake and internalisation of copper by three marine microalgae: comparison of copper-sensitive and copper-tolerant species.

    Jacqueline L Levy;Brad M Angel;Brad M Angel;Jennifer L Stauber;Wing L Poon

  • Use and limitations of microbial bioassays for assessing copper bioavailability in the aquatic environment

    Unknown

  • Effect of initial cell density on the bioavailability and toxicity of copper in microalgal bioassays

    Unknown

  • Determination of trace element speciation and the role of speciation in aquatic toxicity

    T.M. Florence;G.M. Morrison;J.L. Stauber

  • Toxicity of copper complexes to the marine diatom Nitzschia closterium

    Unknown

  • Applications of flow cytometry to ecotoxicity testing using microalgae

    Unknown

  • Changes in manganese and lead in the environment and young children associated with the introduction of methylcyclopentadienyl manganese tricarbonyl in gasoline--preliminary results.

    Brian Gulson;Karen Mizon;Alan Taylor;Michael Korsch

Frequent Co-Authors

Graeme E. Batley
Graeme E. Batley Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Dianne F. Jolley
Dianne F. Jolley University of Wollongong
Richard P. Lim
Richard P. Lim University of Technology Sydney
Simon C. Apte
Simon C. Apte Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Stuart L. Simpson
Stuart L. Simpson Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Brian Gulson
Brian Gulson Macquarie University
Christopher Hickey
Christopher Hickey National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research
Michael St. J. Warne
Michael St. J. Warne University of Queensland
Gregory M. Morrison
Gregory M. Morrison Curtin University
Barbara F. Nowak
Barbara F. Nowak University of Tasmania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degree options can open doors to diverse career pathways. Many programs offer flexible online formats that cater to working professionals and those seeking advanced knowledge. For example, educators looking to specialize in environmental education might consider the best online eds to edd programs, which provide leadership skills alongside a focus on sustainable practices.

Social work also intersects with environmental issues, especially in community health and advocacy roles. Discovering fully funded dsw programs online can be an excellent way to combine social impact with environmental stewardship.

For those uncertain about specialization, pursuing a broader degree might be a good start. Programs that highlight low cost online general studies degree options allow students to tailor their studies toward sustainability whilst keeping educational expenses manageable.

Finally, if you prefer a quicker route into the workforce, considering some of the easiest bachelor degree to get could help you obtain foundational qualifications swiftly, particularly in fields related to environmental policy and management. Each of these pathways offers distinctive opportunities to build a meaningful career connected to environmental sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Jennifer L. Stauber

Recently Published Articles