World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
Netherlands
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 49 5757 5592 90 82 132 16859

Boudewijn F. van Dongen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Boudewijn F. van Dongen between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Boudewijn F. van Dongen published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 6.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 2018. 16 of the 163 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 2018. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 26 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 12 publications
2002 2025

163 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Boudewijn F. van Dongen: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 2
2004 3
2005 5
2006 4
2007 5
2008 6
2009 3
2010 3
2011 9
2012 9
2013 8
2014 3
2015 4
2016 10
2017 9
2018 26
2019 8
2020 6
2021 7
2022 10
2023 6
2024 4
2025 12
Total 163
Download as CSV

Boudewijn F. van Dongen publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Boudewijn F. van Dongen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 132–141 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 132 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555 132
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Boudewijn F. van Dongen D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Boudewijn F. van Dongen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543 49
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Netherlands Leader Award

Overview

Boudewijn F. van Dongen is affiliated with Eindhoven University of Technology in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on computer science and business, management and accounting, with a significant number of publications contributing to these fields.

The scientist's research interests include several subfields such as management information systems, information systems, artificial intelligence, management science and operations research, and sociology and political science. Specific topics covered in their work comprise business process modeling and analysis, service-oriented architecture and web services, semantic web and ontologies, data quality and management, software system performance and reliability, petri nets in system modeling, and access control and trust.

Several frequent coauthors collaborate with Boudewijn F. van Dongen, including Marwan Hassani, Dominique Sommers, Natalia Sidorova, Felix Mannhardt, and Rashid Zaman. The collaboration breadth indicates an active research network within their domains.

The scientist has published extensively in various venues, with frequent contributions to:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Information Systems
  • Process Science
  • Proceedings of the 37th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing
  • Frontiers in Big Data

Boudewijn F. van Dongen's recent papers include:

  • "BPI Challenge 2020," 2020, 4TU.ResearchData
  • "Process science: the interdisciplinary study of socio-technical change," 2024, Process Science
  • "What averages do not tell," 2022, Proceedings of the 37th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing
  • "Prefix Imputation of Orphan Events in Event Stream Processing," 2021, Frontiers in Big Data
  • "Special issue on business process intelligence," 2020, Computing

In addition to articles, the scientist has contributed to book publications, including a work published by Springer Science+Business Media titled "Cooperative Information Systems" in 2023.

Best Publications

  • Process Mining Manifesto

    Wil van der Aalst;Wil van der Aalst;Arya Adriansyah;Ana Karla Alves de Medeiros;Franco Arcieri

  • Workflow mining: a survey of issues and approaches

    W. M. P. van der Aalst;B. F. van Dongen;J. Herbst;L. Maruster

  • The prom framework: a new era in process mining tool support

    B. F. van Dongen;A. K. A. de Medeiros;H. M. W. Verbeek;A. J. M. M. Weijters

  • Business process mining: An industrial application

    W. M. P. van der Aalst;H. A. Reijers;A. J. M. M. Weijters;B. F. van Dongen

  • Replaying history on process models for conformance checking and performance analysis

    Wil van der Aalst;Arya Adriansyah;Boudewijn van Dongen

  • Similarity of business process models: Metrics and evaluation

    Remco Dijkman;Marlon Dumas;Boudewijn van Dongen;Reina Käärik

  • Measuring Similarity between Business Process Models

    Boudewijn Dongen;Remco Dijkman;Jan Mendling

  • Conformance Checking Using Cost-Based Fitness Analysis

    A. Adriansyah;B.F. van Dongen;W.M.P. van der Aalst

  • Process Discovery using Integer Linear Programming

    J. M. E. M. van derWerf;B. F. van Dongen;C. A. J. Hurkens;A. Serebrenik

  • Process mining and verification of properties: an approach based on temporal logic

    W. M. P. van der Aalst;H. T. de Beer;B. F. van Dongen

  • XES, XESame, and ProM 6

    Hmw Eric Verbeek;Jcam Joos Buijs;BF Boudewijn van Dongen;Wmp Wil van der Aalst

  • On the Role of Fitness, Precision, Generalization and Simplicity in Process Discovery

    Jcam Joos Buijs;BF Boudewijn van Dongen;Wmp Wil van der Aalst

  • Conformance checking : relating processes and models, relating processes and models

    Josep Carmona;Boudewijn van Dongen;Andreas Solti;Matthias Weidlich

  • ProM 4.0: comprehensive support for real process analysis

    W. M. P. Van Der Aalst;B. F. Van Dongen;C. W. Güunther;R. S. Mans

  • Detection and prediction of errors in EPCs of the SAP reference model

    J. Mendling;H. M. W. Verbeek;B. F. van Dongen;W. M. P. van der Aalst

  • Discovering Workflow Performance Models from Timed Logs

    Wil M. P. van der Aalst;B. F. van Dongen

  • Supporting Flexible Processes through Recommendations Based on History

    Helen Schonenberg;Barbara Weber;Boudewijn Dongen;Wil Aalst

  • A Meta Model for Process Mining Data.

    Boudewijn F. van Dongen;Wil M. P. van der Aalst

  • Quality dimensions in process discovery : the importance of fitness, precision, generalization and simplicity

    Jcam Joos Buijs;van Bf Boudewijn Dongen;van der Wmp Wil Aalst

  • Process Mining: Overview and Outlook of Petri Net Discovery Algorithms

    Unknown

  • Process mining framework for software processes

    Vladimir Rubin;Christian W. Günther;Wil M. P. Van Der Aalst;Ekkart Kindler

Frequent Co-Authors

Wil M. P. van der Aalst
Wil M. P. van der Aalst RWTH Aachen University
Josep Carmona
Josep Carmona Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya
Matthias Weidlich
Matthias Weidlich Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Jan Mendling
Jan Mendling Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Arthur H. M. ter Hofstede
Arthur H. M. ter Hofstede Queensland University of Technology
Remco Dijkman
Remco Dijkman Eindhoven University of Technology
Dirk Fahland
Dirk Fahland Eindhoven University of Technology
Marcello La Rosa
Marcello La Rosa University of Melbourne
Massimiliano de Leoni
Massimiliano de Leoni University of Padua
Moe Thandar Wynn
Moe Thandar Wynn Queensland University of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As the demand for tech skills grows, online education offers flexible and affordable options for students exploring computer science and related fields. Many learners pursue specialization and career advancement with options that fit their schedules and budgets.

For those interested in data science, choosing a cheap online masters can make investing in your future more accessible without compromising on quality. If your interests extend beyond computer science, you might consider programs such as the best online construction management degree, which can lead to dynamic roles in project management and technology-driven industries.

For broader business acumen, an mba online cheap gives you the strategic skills valued in both tech startups and established corporations. Additionally, you can accelerate your credentials with the best one year masters programs, ideal for professionals wanting to quickly transition or upskill in today’s fast-moving job market.

Exploring these online degrees can open multiple career pathways, allowing you to tailor your learning journey to your goals in technology and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Boudewijn F. van Dongen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles