World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
38
Citations
9053
World Ranking
8741
National Ranking
879

Neuroscience

D-Index
38
Citations
8926
World Ranking
8454
National Ranking
622

Riccardo Russo publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Riccardo Russo sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 79 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Riccardo Russo D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Riccardo Russo sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Riccardo Russo is affiliated with the University of Essex in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple areas within psychology and neuroscience, focusing significantly on the intersections of psychological well-being, social exclusion, and cognitive neuroscience.

The main fields of study covered by Russo include Psychology and Neuroscience. These fields break down into specific subfields such as Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Signal Processing, Health, and General Health Professions.

Russo's research topics emphasize Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction as well as Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion. Additional areas include Health disparities and outcomes, Employment and Welfare Studies, the Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism, Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies, and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies.

They have published research in a variety of academic journals, with frequent publications in PLoS ONE. Other publication venues include the International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Sensors, and IEEE Access.

  • The social readjustment rating scale: Updated and modernised, 2023, PLoS ONE
  • Different stages of emotional prosody processing in healthy ageing-evidence from behavioural responses, ERPs, tDCS, and tRNS, 2022, PLoS ONE
  • Breakfast and Beyond: The Dietary, Social and Practical Impacts of a Universal Free School Breakfast Scheme in the North West of England, UK, 2020, International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food
  • Automatic User Preferences Selection of Smart Hearing Aid Using BioAid, 2022, Sensors
  • Who tugs at our heart strings? The effect of avatar images on player generosity in the dictator game, 2021, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Frequent collaborators of Russo include Denise Wallace, Kathryn Buchanan, Jonathan J. Rolison, Nicholas R. Cooper, and Alejandra Sel. This network of co-authors represents ongoing work across several interdisciplinary research projects.

Best Publications

  • Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety

    Elaine Fox;Riccardo Russo;Robert Bowles;Kevin Dutton

  • Attentional Bias for Threat: Evidence for Delayed Disengagement from Emotional Faces.

    Elaine Fox;Riccardo Russo;Kevin Dutton

  • Facial expressions of emotion: Are angry faces detected more efficiently?

    Elaine Fox;Victoria Lester;Riccardo Russo;R.J. Bowles

  • Focusing on fear: Attentional disengagement from emotional faces

    George A Georgiou;Cheryl Bleakley;James Hayward;Riccardo Russo

  • Anxiety modulates the degree of attentive resources required to process emotional faces.

    Elaine Fox;Riccardo Russo;George A. Georgiou

  • On the differential nature of implicit and explicit memory.

    Alan J. Parkin;Thomas K. Reid;Riccardo Russo

  • Does short-term exposure to mobile phone base station signals increase symptoms in individuals who report sensitivity to electromagnetic fields? A double-blind randomized provocation study.

    Stacy Eltiti;Denise Wallace;Anna Ridgewell;Konstantina Zougkou

  • The British public’s perception of the UK smart metering initiative: Threats and opportunities

    Kathryn Buchanan;Nick Banks;Ian Preston;Riccardo Russo

  • Development and evaluation of the electromagnetic hypersensitivity questionnaire.

    Stacy Eltiti;Denise Wallace;Konstantina Zougkou;Riccardo Russo

  • The cognitive effects of listening to background music on older adults: processing speed improves with upbeat music, while memory seems to benefit from both upbeat and downbeat music.

    Sara Bottiroli;Alessia Rosi;Riccardo Russo;Tomaso Vecchi

  • Age differences in implicit memory: More apparent than real

    Riccardo Russo;Alan J. Parkin

  • The picture superiority effect in recognition memory: A developmental study using the response signal procedure

    Margaret Anne Defeyter;Riccardo Russo;Pamela Louise McPartlin

  • Statistics for the Behavioural Sciences: An Introduction

    Riccardo Russo

  • Age differences and the identity negative priming effect: An updated meta-analysis

    Nadia Gamboz;Riccardo Russo;Elaine Fox

  • Perception of Comfort During Active and Sham Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: A Double Blind Study

    Riccardo Russo;Denise Wallace;Paul Bernard Fitzgerald;Nicholas R Cooper

  • A combined use of phase plane and handling diagram method to study the influence of tyre and vehicle characteristics on stability

    Flavio Farroni;Michele Russo;Riccardo Russo;Mario Terzo

  • Developmental Trends in Implicit and Explicit Memory: A Picture Completion Study

    R. Russo;P. Nichelli;M. Gibertoni;C Cornia

  • Theoretical and experimental investigation into the influence of the periodic backlash fluctuations on the gear rattle

    Ernesto Rocca;Riccardo Russo

  • Does acute exposure to mobile phones affect human attention

    Riccardo Russo;Elaine Fox;Caterina Cinel;Angela Boldini

  • Perceived Comfort and Blinding Efficacy in Randomised Sham-Controlled Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Trials at 2 mA in Young and Older Healthy Adults.

    Denise Wallace;Nicholas R. Cooper;Silke Paulmann;Paul B. Fitzgerald

  • Revising current two-process accounts of spacing effects in memory.

    Riccardo Russo;Alan J. Parkin;Sandra R. Taylor;Jacqueline Wilks

Frequent Co-Authors

Elaine Fox
Elaine Fox University of Oxford
Alan J. Parkin
Alan J. Parkin University of Sussex
Paul B. Fitzgerald
Paul B. Fitzgerald Australian National University
Tomaso Vecchi
Tomaso Vecchi University of Pavia
Paolo Frigio Nichelli
Paolo Frigio Nichelli University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
Annalena Venneri
Annalena Venneri Brunel University London
Kun Yang
Kun Yang University of Essex
Hilde M. Geurts
Hilde M. Geurts University of Amsterdam
Jackie Andrade
Jackie Andrade Plymouth University
Hans Spinnler
Hans Spinnler University of Milan

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in neuroscience, a range of online degree programs can lead to meaningful careers in mental health, research, and counseling. Many students explore related fields such as psychology or counseling to broaden their career opportunities and skillsets.

If you’re considering a career in counseling, it’s important to look for cacrep accredited online counseling programs, which ensure your degree meets industry standards and licensing requirements. The masters in counseling online cost can vary, so comparing tuition and financial aid options is essential for finding the most affordable route.

Those interested in family dynamics and therapy may consider marriage and family therapy master's programs. These credentials can lead to specialized roles supporting families and couples while drawing on neuroscience insights.

Alternatively, an affordable online master's in psychology is another popular pathway, offering foundational knowledge aligned with brain science and mental health careers. No matter the specialization, online programs provide flexibility and access for aspiring neuroscience professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Riccardo Russo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles