World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
35
Citations
6401
World Ranking
9140
National Ranking
672

Joseph M. Galea publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joseph M. Galea sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 70 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Joseph M. Galea D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joseph M. Galea sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Joseph M. Galea is affiliated with the University of Birmingham in the United Kingdom and has contributed extensively to the fields of neuroscience and engineering. Their research primarily spans cognitive neuroscience and biomedical engineering, with additional work in neurology, social psychology, and rehabilitation.

The main research topics that Joseph M. Galea focuses on include:

  • Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery

Joseph M. Galea has published numerous papers, with recent examples including:

  • "A methodological framework to assess the accuracy of virtual reality hand-tracking systems: A case study with the Meta Quest 2" (2023), published in Behavior Research Methods
  • "Reward-Based Improvements in Motor Control Are Driven by Multiple Error-Reducing Mechanisms" (2020), published in Journal of Neuroscience
  • "Sensorimotor feedback loops are selectively sensitive to reward" (2023), published in eLife
  • "A Methodological Framework to Assess the Accuracy of Virtual Reality Hand-Tracking Systems: A case study with the Oculus Quest 2" (2022), published in bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • "The dissociable effects of reward on sequential motor behavior" (2022), published in Journal of Neurophysiology

Their publication record also includes frequent contributions to venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Brain Stimulation, Behavior Research Methods, Journal of Neuroscience, and eLife.

Collaborations have been a regular part of Joseph M. Galea's work. Frequent co-authors include Sebastian Sporn, Ned Jenkinson, Olivier Codol, Raphaël Hamel, and Mark R. Hinder, each contributing across multiple joint publications.

Best Publications

  • Dissociating the Roles of the Cerebellum and Motor Cortex during Adaptive Learning: The Motor Cortex Retains What the Cerebellum Learns

    Joseph M. Galea;Alejandro Vazquez;Neel Pasricha;Jean Jacques Orban De Xivry

  • Modulation of Cerebellar Excitability by Polarity-Specific Noninvasive Direct Current Stimulation

    Joseph M. Galea;Gowri Jayaram;Loni Ajagbe;Pablo Celnik

  • Consensus Paper: Towards a Systems-Level View of Cerebellar Function: the Interplay Between Cerebellum, Basal Ganglia, and Cortex.

    Daniele Caligiore;Giovanni Pezzulo;Gianluca Baldassarre;Andreea C. Bostan

  • Dopamine, affordance and active inference.

    Karl J. Friston;Tamara Shiner;Thomas H. B. FitzGerald;Joseph M. Galea

  • The dissociable effects of punishment and reward on motor learning

    Joseph M Galea;Elizabeth Mallia;John Rothwell;Jörn Diedrichsen

  • Speech Facilitation by Left Inferior Frontal Cortex Stimulation

    Rachel Holland;Alex P. Leff;Oliver Josephs;Oliver Josephs;Joseph M. Galea

  • Non-invasive Cerebellar Stimulation—a Consensus Paper

    G Grimaldi;GP Argyropoulos;A Boehringer;Pablo Celnik

  • Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (ctDCS) A Novel Approach to Understanding Cerebellar Function in Health and Disease

    Giuliana Grimaldi;Georgios P. Argyropoulos;Amy Bastian;Mar Cortes

  • Human Locomotor Adaptive Learning Is Proportional to Depression of Cerebellar Excitability

    Gowri Jayaram;Gowri Jayaram;Joseph M. Galea;Amy J. Bastian;Amy J. Bastian;Pablo Celnik

  • Brain polarization enhances the formation and retention of motor memories

    Joseph Michael Galea;Pablo Celnik

  • Disruption of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex facilitates the consolidation of procedural skills

    Joseph M. Galea;Neil B. Albert;Thomas Ditye;R. Chris Miall

  • Cerebellar modulation of human associative plasticity

    Masashi Hamada;Gionata Strigaro;Nagako Murase;Anna Sadnicka

  • Two distinct interneuron circuits in human motor cortex are linked to different subsets of physiological and behavioral plasticity.

    M. Hamada;J. M. Galea;V. Di Lazzaro;P. Mazzone

  • Dynamic Modulation of Cerebellar Excitability for Abrupt, But Not Gradual, Visuomotor Adaptation

    John E. Schlerf;Joseph M. Galea;Amy J. Bastian;Amy J. Bastian;Pablo A. Celnik

  • Reward and punishment enhance motor adaptation in stroke

    Graziella Quattrocchi;Richard Greenwood;John C Rothwell;Joseph M Galea

  • Contribution of explicit processes to reinforcement-based motor learning.

    Peter James Holland;Olivier Codol;Joseph M. Galea

  • Individual differences in explicit and implicit visuomotor learning and working memory capacity

    Antonios I. Christou;Antonios I. Christou;R. Chris Miall;Fiona McNab;Fiona McNab;Joseph M. Galea

  • No consistent effect of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation on visuomotor adaptation

    Roya Jalali;R.Christopher Miall;Joseph M. Galea

  • Muscle and timing-specific functional connectivity between the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and the primary motor cortex

    Alkomiet Hasan;Joseph M. Galea;Elias P. Casula;Peter Falkai

  • Laterality Differences in Cerebellar–motor Cortex Connectivity

    John E. Schlerf;Joseph M. Galea;Danny Spampinato;Pablo A. Celnik

Frequent Co-Authors

John C. Rothwell
John C. Rothwell University College London
Pablo Celnik
Pablo Celnik Johns Hopkins University
Sven Bestmann
Sven Bestmann University College London
Kailash P. Bhatia
Kailash P. Bhatia University College London
Amy J. Bastian
Amy J. Bastian Kennedy Krieger Institute
R. C. Miall
R. C. Miall University of Birmingham
Roberta Ferrucci
Roberta Ferrucci University of Milan
Raymond J. Dolan
Raymond J. Dolan University College London
Ulf Ziemann
Ulf Ziemann University of Tübingen
Cathy J. Price
Cathy J. Price University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in neuroscience, closely related online degrees are available to help support diverse career ambitions. Many students opt for an online masters psychology program to gain insights into the workings of the mind and behavior—skills that pair well with neuroscience.

For those drawn to clinical practice, marriage and family therapy master's programs offer online flexibility and can prepare you for professional licensure in a mental health field. Another common option is pursuing a social work credential; accelerated options such as 1 year msw programs online no bsw allow you to make a career transition in less time, even if you don’t hold a background in social work.

Prospective students often ask, how much is a psychology degree? Online options are generally more affordable than traditional routes, opening doors for more students to enter neuroscience-adjacent fields. Explore these pathways to discover which degree best aligns with your interests and professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Joseph M. Galea

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles