World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
44
Citations
13420
World Ranking
6820
National Ranking
3699

Diane L. Schallert publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diane L. Schallert sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 125 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Diane L. Schallert D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diane L. Schallert sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1979 - Palmer O. Johnson Memorial Award, American Educational Research Association

Overview

Diane L. Schallert is affiliated with The University of Texas at Austin in the United States. Their research output spans several fields within the social sciences, with a primary focus on education and psychology. The main fields of study for their work include Social Sciences, Psychology, and Arts and Humanities. More specifically, subfields such as Education, Literature and Literary Theory, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, and Social Psychology are prominent in their publications.

The main topics covered in Diane L. Schallert's research involve Student Assessment and Feedback, Online and Blended Learning, Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods, Literacy, Media, and Education, Communication in Education and Healthcare, EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning, and Education and Critical Thinking Development.

The scientist has authored recent papers that include the following:

  • "Feedback to the future": Advancing motivational and emotional perspectives in feedback research (2023), Educational Psychologist
  • A critical review of the refutation text literature: Methodological confounds, theoretical problems, and possible solutions (2021), Educational Psychologist
  • Making feedback constructive: the interplay of undergraduates' motivation with perceptions of feedback specificity and friendliness (2021), Educational Psychology
  • The collective classroom "we": The role of students' sense of belonging on their affective, cognitive, and discourse experiences of online and face-to-face discussions (2023), Linguistics and Education
  • Reciprocity between doctoral students' emerging professional identity and their envisionment of a possible future self in real and imagined communities of practice (2020), Learning Culture and Social Interaction

Frequent coauthors who have collaborated with Diane L. Schallert include Allison Zengilowski, Carlton J. Fong, Brady Nash, Kyle M. Williams, and Shengjie Lin.

The scientist's work has appeared in publication venues such as Educational Psychologist, Linguistics and Education, Educational Psychology, Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), and International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning.

Diane L. Schallert was awarded the Palmer O. Johnson Memorial Award from the American Educational Research Association in 1979.

Best Publications

  • Frameworks for Comprehending Discourse

    Richard C. Anderson;Ralph E. Reynolds;Diane L. Schallert;Ernest T. Goetz

  • Coming to Terms: How Researchers in Learning and Literacy Talk About Knowledge

    Patricia A. Alexander;Diane L. Schallert;Victoria C. Hare

  • Language Anxiety: Differentiating Writing and Speaking Components

    Yuh Show Cheng;Elaine K. Horwitz;Diane L. Schallert

  • Interpreting metaphors and idioms: Some effects of context on comprehension

    Andrew Ortony;Diane L. Schallert;Ralph E. Reynolds;Stephen J. Antos

  • Self-kindness when facing stress: The role of self-compassion, goal regulation, and support in college students’ well-being.

    Michelle E. Neely;Diane L. Schallert;Sarojanni S. Mohammed;Rochelle M. Roberts

  • The Relative Contribution of L2 Language Proficiency and L1 Reading Ability to L2 Reading Performance: A Test of the Threshold Hypothesis in an EFL Context

    Jeong‐Won Lee;Diane Lemonnier Schallert

  • What Is Learning Anyway? A Topographical Perspective Considered.

    Patricia A. Alexander;Diane L. Schallert;Ralph E. Reynolds

  • Instantiation of general terms

    Richard C. Anderson;James W. Pichert;Ernest T. Goetz;Diane L. Schallert

  • Implications from self-efficacy and attribution theories for an understanding of undergraduates' motivation in a foreign language course

    Pei Hsuan Peggy Hsieh;Diane L. Schallert

  • Expectancy-Value Relationships of Shame Reactions and Shame Resiliency.

    Jeannine E. Turner;Diane L. Schallert

  • Effects of learner control, advisement, and prior knowledge on young students' learning in a hypertext environment

    E. Christine Shin;Diane L. Schallert;Wilhelmina C. Savenye

  • Working memory and expertise in simultaneous interpreting

    Minhua Liu;Diane L. Schallert;Patrick J. Carroll

  • Improving memory for prose: The relationship between depth of processing and context

    Diane Lemonnier Schallert

  • The Importance of Students' Goals in Their Emotional Experience of Academic Failure: Investigating the Precursors and Consequences of Shame

    Jeannine E. Turner;Jenefer Husman;Diane L. Schallert

  • Emotions and classroom talk: Toward a model of the role of affect in students' experiences of classroom discussions

    Seung Lee Do;Diane Lemonnier Schallert

  • Middle School Students’ Self-Efficacy, Attitudes, and Achievement in a Computer-Enhanced Problem-Based Learning Environment

    Min Liu;Peggy Hsieh;Yoonjung Cho;Diane L. Schallert

  • Reading in Perspective: What Real Cops and Pretend Burglars Look for in a Story.

    Ernest T. Goetz;Diane L. Schallert;Ralph E. Reynolds;Dean I. Radin

  • The measurement of motor, visual and auditory discrimination skills in mentally retarded children and adults and in young normal chilren.

    Nancy Kerr;Lee Meyerson;June Flora;Deborah Tharinger

  • Meeting in the margins: Effects of the teacher–student relationship on revision processes of EFL college students taking a composition course

    Given Lee;Diane L. Schallert

  • An Integrative Cultural View of Achievement Motivation: Parental and Classroom Predictors of Children's Goal Orientations when Learning Mathematics in Korea.

    Jung In Kim;Diane L Schallert;Myoungsook Kim

Frequent Co-Authors

Patricia A. Alexander
Patricia A. Alexander University of Maryland, College Park
Richard C. Anderson
Richard C. Anderson University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Min Liu
Min Liu The University of Texas at Austin
Elaine K. Horwitz
Elaine K. Horwitz The University of Texas at Austin
Andrew Ortony
Andrew Ortony Northwestern University
Raymond W. Kulhavy
Raymond W. Kulhavy Arizona State University
June A. Flora
June A. Flora Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology opens the door to a range of fulfilling online degrees and career pathways in mental health and education. Many students pursue specialized roles such as school counseling, which requires specific education, licensure, and training depending on the state where you plan to practice.

For example, the requirements to be a school counselor in Mississippi include completion of an approved program and passing relevant tests. If you’re interested in working in Missouri, the process is outlined in the guide for how to become a school counselor in Missouri, which includes specific endorsement and internship requirements.

In Montana, Montana school counselor certification requirements focus on graduate-level coursework and state licensure. Meanwhile, students seeking opportunities in Nebraska should review the Nebraska school counselor education requirements for graduate study and certification details.

By understanding these diverse requirements, you can select the right online degree and career path to support your goals in psychology and counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Diane L. Schallert

Trending Scientists