World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Sally A. Goldman

Sally A. Goldman

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
30
Citations
7299
World Ranking
13857
National Ranking
5506

Sally A. Goldman publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sally A. Goldman sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 141 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Sally A. Goldman D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sally A. Goldman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Sally A. Goldman is affiliated with Google in the United States. Their work is connected to the broader field of computer science and technology, as indicated by the professional association with Google, a leading company in the technology sector.

The available data does not include specific publications or detailed research topics, which limits a detailed account of their academic contributions or thematic focus areas. There is no information on recent papers authored, co-authors frequently collaborated with, or common venues where research has been published.

Similarly, there are no records of book publications or awards received by Sally A. Goldman. Without specifics on fields of study, subfields, or main research topics, it is not possible to elaborate on the scientific domains or specializations this researcher has contributed to.

The absence of citation information and publication metrics means there is no direct insight into the impact or reception of their scholarly work within academic circles or industry.

Best Publications

  • Image segmentation evaluation: A survey of unsupervised methods

    Hui Zhang;Jason E. Fritts;Sally A. Goldman

  • EM-DD: An Improved Multiple-Instance Learning Technique

    Qi Zhang;Sally A. Goldman

  • Enhancing Supervised Learning with Unlabeled Data

    Sally A. Goldman;Yan Zhou

  • On the Complexity of Teaching

    S.A. Goldman;M.J. Kearns

  • Content-Based Image Retrieval Using Multiple-Instance Learning

    Qi Zhang;Sally A. Goldman;Wei Yu;Jason Fritts

  • Democratic co-learning

    Y. Zhou;S. Goldman

  • Localized content based image retrieval

    Rouhollah Rahmani;Sally A. Goldman;Hui Zhang;John Krettek

  • An entropy-based objective evaluation method for image segmentation

    Hui Zhang;Jason E. Fritts;Sally A. Goldman

  • Localized Content-Based Image Retrieval

    R. Rahmani;S.A. Goldman;Hui Zhang;S.R. Cholleti

  • ISIS: interface for a semantic information system

    Kenneth J. Goldman;Sally A. Goldman;Paris C. Kanellakis;Stanley B. Zdonik

  • MISSL: multiple-instance semi-supervised learning

    Rouhollah Rahmani;Sally A. Goldman

  • Teaching a Smarter Learner

    Sally A. Goldman;H.David Mathias

  • Learning binary relations and total orders

    Sally A. Goldman;Ronald L. Rivest;Robert E. Schapire

  • Multiple-Instance Learning of Real-Valued Data

    Robert Amar;Daniel R. Dooly;Sally A. Goldman;Qi Zhang

  • Can PAC learning algorithms tolerate random attribute noise

    S. A. Goldman;R. H. Sloan

  • On-line analysis of the TCP acknowledgment delay problem

    Daniel R. Dooly;Sally A. Goldman;Stephen D. Scott

  • Multiple instance learning of real valued data

    Daniel R. Dooly;Qi Zhang;Sally A. Goldman;Robert A. Amar

  • TCP dynamic acknowledgment delay (extended abstract): theory and practice

    Daniel R. Dooly;Sally A. Goldman;Stephen D. Scott

  • Online Scheduling with Hard Deadlines

    Sally A Goldman;Jyoti Parwatikar;Subhash Suri

  • Asking questions to minimize errors

    Nader H. Bshouty;Sally A. Goldman;Thomas R. Hancock;Sleiman Matar

  • Computational learning theory

    Sally A. Goldman

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert E. Schapire
Robert E. Schapire Microsoft (United States)
Michael Kearns
Michael Kearns University of Pennsylvania
Paul Goldberg
Paul Goldberg Boston University
Avrim Blum
Avrim Blum Toyota Technological Institute at Chicago
Subhash Suri
Subhash Suri University of California, Santa Barbara
Manfred K. Warmuth
Manfred K. Warmuth Google (United States)
Stanley B. Zdonik
Stanley B. Zdonik Brown University
Kirk E. Smith
Kirk E. Smith University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Yoram Singer
Yoram Singer Princeton University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to many related fields and flexible study options. Students often consider the data science learning path to build on their analytical skills and increase employability in tech-driven industries.

Another popular option is electrical engineering. Those seeking flexibility can benefit from the online electrical engineering degree ranking to find the best accredited programs available remotely, often vital for working professionals balancing career and education.

For focused, high-ROI credentials, many students consider alternative routes like 3-month certificate programs that pay well. These provide fast, targeted training for in-demand skills, offering quicker entry into the tech workforce or upskilling opportunities.

If you’re looking to advance your qualifications in a short time frame, review the shortest masters degree options. These accelerated programs offer intensive study, typically enabling students to earn a master’s in as little as one year.

Best Scientists Citing Sally A. Goldman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles