World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
79
Citations
27425
World Ranking
1134
National Ranking
603

Michael Kearns publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Kearns sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 227 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Michael Kearns D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Kearns sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2014 - ACM Fellow For contributions to machine learning, artificial intelligence, and algorithmic game theory and computational social science.
  • 2012 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
  • 2003 - Fellow of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) For significant contributions to computational learning theory, to reinforcement learning and stochastic planning, to dialogue agents, and to the theory of multi-agent systems.

Overview

Michael Kearns is affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania in the United States and primarily focuses on research in computer science, with a specialization in artificial intelligence. Their work spans several subfields including safety research, sociology and political science, information systems, and epidemiology.

The scientist's recent publications illustrate a diverse engagement with topics related to algorithms, privacy, and ethics. Some notable papers include:

  • The Ethical Algorithm: The Science of Socially Aware Algorithm Design (2021, Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith)
  • Mixed Differential Privacy in Computer Vision (2022, 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)
  • Confidence-ranked reconstruction of census microdata from published statistics (2023, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)
  • Ethical algorithm design (2020, ACM SIGecom Exchanges)
  • An Algorithmic Framework for Bias Bounties (2022, 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency)

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Michael Kearns include Aaron Roth, Zhiwei Steven Wu, Emily Diana, Ira Globus-Harris, and Alessandro Achille. The collaboration with these researchers reflects interdisciplinary efforts in areas related to their main topics of study.

Michael Kearns publishes regularly in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl), the ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, and Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith.

Their research focuses on key topics within computer science including:

  • Privacy-preserving technologies in data
  • Stochastic gradient optimization techniques
  • Ethics and social impacts of artificial intelligence
  • Adversarial robustness in machine learning
  • Machine learning and data classification
  • Cryptography and data security
  • Criminal justice and corrections analysis

Over their career, Michael Kearns has received recognition such as the ACM Fellow award in 2014 for contributions to machine learning, artificial intelligence, algorithmic game theory, and computational social science. They were also named a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 2012 and a Fellow of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) in 2003, highlighting contributions to computational learning theory, reinforcement learning, stochastic planning, dialogue agents, and multi-agent systems.

Best Publications

  • An Introduction to Computational Learning Theory

    Michael J. Kearns;Umesh V. Vazirani

  • Cryptographic limitations on learning Boolean formulae and finite automata

    Michael Kearns;Leslie Valiant

  • Efficient noise-tolerant learning from statistical queries

    Michael Kearns

  • Near-Optimal Reinforcement Learning in Polynomial Time

    Michael Kearns;Satinder Singh

  • A Sparse Sampling Algorithm for Near-Optimal Planning in Large Markov Decision Processes

    Michael Kearns;Yishay Mansour;Andrew Y. Ng

  • Algorithmic stability and sanity-check bounds for leave-one-out cross-validation

    Michael Kearns;Dana Ron

  • Learning in the presence of malicious errors

    Michael Kearns;Ming Li

  • Graphical models for game theory

    Michael J. Kearns;Michael L. Littman;Satinder P. Singh

  • Efficient distribution-free learning of probabilistic concepts

    Michael J. Kearns;Robert E. Schapire

  • Toward efficient agnostic learning

    Michael J. Kearns;Robert E. Schapire;Linda M. Sellie

  • On the Boosting Ability of Top-Down Decision Tree Learning Algorithms

    Michael Kearns;Yishay Mansour

  • On the Complexity of Teaching

    S.A. Goldman;M.J. Kearns

  • Optimizing dialogue management with reinforcement learning: experiments with the NJFun system

    Satinder Singh;Diane Litman;Michael Kearns;Marilyn Walker

  • Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairness

    Michael J. Kearns;Seth Neel;Aaron Roth;Zhiwei Steven Wu

  • Cryptographic Primitives Based on Hard Learning Problems

    Avrim Blum;Merrick L. Furst;Michael J. Kearns;Richard J. Lipton

  • On the learnability of Boolean formulae

    M. Kearns;M. Li;L. Pitt;L. Valiant

  • An Experimental Study of the Coloring Problem on Human Subject Networks

    Michael Kearns;Siddharth Suri;Nick Montfort

  • Nash convergence of gradient dynamics in general-sum games

    Satinder P. Singh;Michael J. Kearns;Yishay Mansour

  • Fairness in learning: classic and contextual bandits

    Matthew Joseph;Michael Kearns;Jamie Morgenstern;Aaron Roth

  • Near-Optimal Reinforcement Learning in Polynominal Time

    Michael J. Kearns;Satinder P. Singh

  • Proceedings of the 1997 conference on Advances in neural information processing systems 10

    Michael I. Jordan;Michael J. Kearns;Sara A. Solla

Frequent Co-Authors

Aaron Roth
Aaron Roth University of Pennsylvania
Yishay Mansour
Yishay Mansour Tel Aviv University
Satinder Singh
Satinder Singh DeepMind (United Kingdom)
Robert E. Schapire
Robert E. Schapire Microsoft (United States)
Umesh Vazirani
Umesh Vazirani University of California, Berkeley
Dana Ron
Dana Ron Tel Aviv University
Leslie G. Valiant
Leslie G. Valiant Harvard University
Andrew Y. Ng
Andrew Y. Ng Stanford University
David Haussler
David Haussler University of California, Santa Cruz

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering studying Computer Science in the USA, there are several closely related online degrees and career pathways to explore. Interdisciplinary fields, such as environmental engineering, mechanical engineering, and physics, often intersect with computer science and open new opportunities for specialized careers.

For those focused on affordability, you may want to investigate the cheapest online environmental science degree or the cheapest mechanical engineering degree online. These programs can provide a strong foundation in science and engineering, while also integrating computer modeling and analytical skills.

Another excellent option is pursuing the cheapest online physics degree, which is valuable for students interested in software development, data analysis, or technical research roles.

If your interest leans toward big data, you can follow a data science learning path and specialize in analytics, artificial intelligence, or machine learning. Each of these degrees and pathways complements computer science and could enhance your career prospects in the tech industry.

Best Scientists Citing Michael Kearns

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles