World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
35
Citations
5479
World Ranking
9836
National Ranking
5202

Raymond W. Kulhavy publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Raymond W. Kulhavy sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 94 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

Raymond W. Kulhavy D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Raymond W. Kulhavy sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1974 - Palmer O. Johnson Memorial Award, American Educational Research Association

Overview

Raymond W. Kulhavy was affiliated with Arizona State University in the United States. Throughout their career, they contributed to the field of educational research.

In 1974, Kulhavy received the Palmer O. Johnson Memorial Award from the American Educational Research Association.

Best Publications

  • Feedback in Written Instruction

    Raymond W. Kulhavy

  • Feedback in written instruction: The place of response certitude

    Raymond W. Kulhavy;William A. Stock

  • Delay-retention effect with multiple-choice tests

    Raymond W. Kulhavy;Richard C. Anderson

  • Notetaking and depth of processing

    Burke H. Bretzing;Raymond W. Kulhavy

  • Feedback Procedures in Programmed Instruction.

    Richard C. Anderson;Raymond W. Kulhavy;Thomas Andre

  • Conjoint retention of maps and related discourse

    Raymond W. Kulhavy;J.Brandon Lee;Linda C. Caterino

  • Feedback complexity and corrective efficiency

    Raymond W. Kulhavy;Mary T. White;Bruce W. Topp;Ann L. Chan

  • Comprehension of Graphics

    Wolfgang Schnotz;Raymond W. Kulhavy

  • Imagery and prose learning

    Richard C. Anderson;Raymond W. Kulhavy

  • Note-Taking and Passage Style.

    Burke H. Bretzing;Raymond W. Kulhavy

  • Influence of spatial organization in prose learning.

    Raymond S. Dean;Raymond W. Kulhavy

  • Learning With Maps and Texts: An Overview

    Michael P. Verdi;Raymond W. Kulhavy

  • How Geographic Maps Increase Recall of Instructional Text.

    Raymond W. Kulhavy;William A. Stock;William A. Kealy

  • Conditions under which feedback facilitates learning from programmed lessons.

    Richard C. Anderson;Raymond W. Kulhavy;Thomas Andre

  • Feedback and Response Confidence.

    Raymond W. Kulhavy;Frank R. Yekovich;James W. Dyer

  • Map features and the recall of discourse

    Neil H. Schwartz;Raymond W. Kulhavy

  • How Cognitive Maps are Learned and Remembered

    Raymond W. Kulhavy;William A. Stock

  • The Effects of Notetaking and Test Expectancy on the Learning of Text Material.

    Raymond W. Kulhavy;James W. Dyer;Linda Silver

  • Learning Concepts from Definitions

    Richard C. Anderson;Raymond W. Kulhavy

  • Feedback processing and error correction

    Kathleen G. Lhyle;Raymond W. Kulhavy

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard C. Anderson
Richard C. Anderson University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Diane L. Schallert
Diane L. Schallert The University of Texas at Austin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens doors to various specialized roles, particularly in mental health services. One prominent pathway is becoming a Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT), a role that requires a mix of academic preparation, practical training, and certification.

If you’re considering this field, each state has distinct requirements. For example, you can learn more about Scottsdale mft certification requirements if you plan to practice in Arizona. Alternatively, those interested in working in Washington can find detailed guidance on how to become an mft in Seattle or how to become a marriage and family therapist in Spokane.

In Missouri, the St. Louis mft certification requirements offer another perspective on the process.

Online psychology degrees can help you begin or advance on these career paths, providing the foundational coursework and flexibility many students need. By understanding state-specific licensing requirements early, you can tailor your educational journey to match your location and long-term goals in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Raymond W. Kulhavy

Recently Published Articles