World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
71
Citations
20899
World Ranking
2390
National Ranking
236

R. C. Miall publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where R. C. Miall sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 189 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

R. C. Miall D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where R. C. Miall sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

R. C. Miall is affiliated with the University of Birmingham in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on the field of neuroscience, with a particular emphasis on cognitive neuroscience and neurology. Additional subfields of study include social psychology, biomedical engineering, and physical therapy, sports therapy, and rehabilitation.

The scientist's work covers a variety of topics centered around motor control and adaptation, which constitutes the majority of their publications. Other significant research areas include vestibular and auditory disorders, transcranial magnetic stimulation studies, action observation and synchronization, tactile and sensory interactions, muscle activation and electromyography studies, as well as balance, gait, and falls prevention.

Some of the notable recent papers authored or co-authored by R. C. Miall are:

  • A methodological framework to assess the accuracy of virtual reality hand-tracking systems: A case study with the Meta Quest 2, 2023, Behavior Research Methods
  • Targeted tDCS selectively improves motor adaptation with the proximal and distal upper limb, 2020, Brain Stimulation
  • Effect of tDCS Over the Right Inferior Parietal Lobule on Mind-Wandering Propensity, 2020, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
  • A Methodological Framework to Assess the Accuracy of Virtual Reality Hand-Tracking Systems: A case study with the Oculus Quest 2, 2022, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Adaptation of reach action to a novel force-field is not predicted by acuity of dynamic proprioception in either older or younger adults, 2020, Experimental Brain Research

The frequent co-authors collaborating with R. C. Miall include Matthew Weightman, Ned Jenkinson, John-Stuart Brittain, Davinia Fernández-Espejo, and Jonathan Cole.

In terms of publication venues, R. C. Miall has published most often in bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), followed by Brain Stimulation, Experimental Brain Research, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, and the Journal of Neurophysiology.

Best Publications

  • Forward models for physiological motor control

    R. C. Miall;D. M. Wolpert

  • Is the cerebellum a smith predictor

    R. C. Miall;D. J. Weir;D. M. Wolpert;J. F. Stein

  • A quantitative meta-analysis and review of motor learning in the human brain.

    Robert M. Hardwick;Claudia Rottschy;Claudia Rottschy;R. Chris Miall;Simon B. Eickhoff;Simon B. Eickhoff;Simon B. Eickhoff

  • Current concepts in procedural consolidation

    Edwin M. Robertson;Alvaro Pascual-Leone;Alvaro Pascual-Leone;R. Chris Miall

  • The Cerebellum: Adaptive Prediction for Movement and Cognition.

    Arseny A. Sokolov;Arseny A. Sokolov;R. Chris Miall;Richard B. Ivry

  • The Resting Human Brain and Motor Learning

    Neil B. Albert;Edwin Malcolm Robertson;R. Chris Miall

  • Brain activation patterns during measurement of sub- and supra-second intervals.

    Penelope A. Lewis;R. C. Miall

  • Consensus Paper: Towards a Systems-Level View of Cerebellar Function: the Interplay Between Cerebellum, Basal Ganglia, and Cortex.

    Daniele Caligiore;Giovanni Pezzulo;Gianluca Baldassarre;Andreea C. Bostan

  • Connecting mirror neurons and forward models.

    Miall Rc

  • Disruption of state estimation in the human lateral cerebellum.

    R. Chris Miall;Lars O. D. Christensen;Owen Cain;James Stanley

  • Remembering the time: a continuous clock

    Penelope A. Lewis;R. Chris Miall

  • Non-invasive Cerebellar Stimulation—a Consensus Paper

    G Grimaldi;GP Argyropoulos;A Boehringer;Pablo Celnik

  • The cerebellum coordinates eye and hand tracking movements.

    R. C. Miall;G. Z. Reckess;H. Imamizu

  • Brain activity correlates differentially with increasing temporal complexity of rhythms during initialisation, synchronisation, and continuation phases of paced finger tapping

    Penelope A. Lewis;A. M. Wing;P. A. Pope;P. Praamstra

  • Intermittency in human manual tracking tasks.

    Miall Rc;Weir Dj;Stein Jf

  • Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (ctDCS) A Novel Approach to Understanding Cerebellar Function in Health and Disease

    Giuliana Grimaldi;Georgios P. Argyropoulos;Amy Bastian;Mar Cortes

  • Task-specific facilitation of cognition by cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the cerebellum

    Paul A. Pope;R. Chris Miall

  • The role of proprioception and attention in a visuomotor adaptation task.

    H.A. Ingram;P. van Donkelaar;J. Cole;J.-L. Vercher

  • A right hemispheric prefrontal system for cognitive time measurement

    Penelope A. Lewis;R. C. Miall

  • The precision of temporal judgement: milliseconds, many minutes, and beyond

    Penelope A. Lewis;R. C. Miall

  • Effects of agency on movement interference during observation of a moving dot stimulus.

    James Stanley;Emma Gowen;R. Chris Miall

Frequent Co-Authors

John F. Stein
John F. Stein University of Oxford
Penelope A. Lewis
Penelope A. Lewis Cardiff University
Xuguang Liu
Xuguang Liu Imperial College London
Daniel M. Wolpert
Daniel M. Wolpert Columbia University
Richard E. Passingham
Richard E. Passingham University of Oxford
Joseph M. Galea
Joseph M. Galea University of Birmingham
Patrick Haggard
Patrick Haggard University College London
Ned Jenkinson
Ned Jenkinson University of Birmingham
Hiroshi Imamizu
Hiroshi Imamizu University of Tokyo
Roberta Ferrucci
Roberta Ferrucci University of Milan

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing R. C. Miall

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles