World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
84
Citations
21048
World Ranking
15295
National Ranking
1403

David Goldsmith publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Goldsmith sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 502 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

David Goldsmith D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Goldsmith sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

David Goldsmith is affiliated with St Thomas' Hospital in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with a significant emphasis on nephrology. Additional subfields include surgery, infectious diseases, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, and public health, environmental and occupational health.

The main research topics covered by Goldsmith include chronic kidney disease and diabetes, inflammatory bowel disease, erythropoietin and anemia treatment, dialysis and renal disease management, wound healing and treatments, as well as COVID-19 and mental health and epidemiological studies related to COVID-19.

Recent published papers by Goldsmith include the following:

  • Four months into the COVID-19 pandemic, Sweden's prized herd immunity is nowhere in sight, 2020, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
  • Renal and Urological Disorders Associated With Inflammatory Bowel Disease, 2022, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
  • Nomenclature in nephrology: preserving 'renal' and 'nephro' in the glossary of kidney health and disease, 2021, Journal of Nephrology
  • Oncogenic mechanisms in renal insufficiency, 2020, Clinical Kidney Journal
  • First clinical evaluation of the safety and efficacy of tarumase for the debridement of venous leg ulcers, 2024, International Wound Journal

Goldsmith's research has been published in various venues, with multiple contributions to the International Wound Journal, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Journal of Nephrology, and Clinical Kidney Journal.

Frequent collaborators include Shankar Kumar, David Fairlamb, Younes Jahangiri, Gregory K. Fritz, and Giuseppe Zambito. Goldsmith has coauthored multiple papers with these researchers.

Best Publications

  • Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes guidelines on anaemia management in chronic kidney disease: a European Renal Best Practice position statement

    Francesco Locatelli;Peter Bárány;Adrian Covic;Angel De Francisco

  • Epidemiology, contributors to, and clinical trials of mortality risk in chronic kidney failure

    Alberto Ortiz;Adrian Covic;Danilo Fliser;Denis Fouque

  • Nephrotic syndrome in adults

    Richard P Hull;David J A Goldsmith

  • Iron management in chronic kidney disease: conclusions from a “Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes” (KDIGO) Controversies Conference

    Iain C. Macdougall;Andreas J. Bircher;Kai Uwe Eckardt;Gregorio T. Obrador

  • Potassium homeostasis and management of dyskalemia in kidney diseases: conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference

    Catherine M. Clase;Juan Jesus Carrero;David H. Ellison;Morgan E. Grams

  • Monocyte count/HDL cholesterol ratio and cardiovascular events in patients with chronic kidney disease

    Mehmet Kanbay;Yalcin Solak;Hilmi Umut Unal;Yasemin Gulcan Kurt

  • Systematic review of the evidence underlying the association between mineral metabolism disturbances and risk of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality and cardiovascular events in chronic kidney disease

    Adrian Covic;Prajesh Kothawala;Myriam Bernal;Sean Robbins

  • Vascular calcification: a stiff challenge for the nephrologist: does preventing bone disease cause arterial disease?

    David Goldsmith;David Goldsmith;Eberhard Ritz;Eberhard Ritz;Adrian Covic;Adrian Covic

  • Immunogenicity of biopharmaceuticals

    Michele Kessler;David Goldsmith;Huub Schellekens

  • Coronary artery calcification is related to coronary atherosclerosis in chronic renal disease patients: a study comparing EBCT-generated coronary artery calcium scores and coronary angiography

    Ali A. Haydar;Nabil M. A. Hujairi;Adrian A. Covic;Divaka Pereira

  • An investigation of the effect of advancing uraemia, renal replacement therapy and renal transplantation on blood pressure diurnal variability.

    C. K. T. Farmer;D. J. A. Goldsmith;J. Cox;P. Dallyn

  • Arterial stiffness in renal patients: an update.

    Adrian Covic;Paul Gusbeth-Tatomir;David J.A. Goldsmith

  • Coronary artery calcification and aortic pulse wave velocity in chronic kidney disease patients

    Ali A. Haydar;Adrian Covic;Helen Colhoun;Michael Rubens

  • Pulmonary Hypertension in CKD

    Davide Bolignano;Stefania Rastelli;Rajiv Agarwal;Danilo Fliser

  • Cardiovascular disease in chronic kidney disease: untying the Gordian knot

    R Hajhosseiny;Kaivan Khavandi;David Goldsmith

  • Use of phosphate-binding agents is associated with a lower risk of mortality

    Jorge B. Cannata-Andía;José L. Fernández-Martín;Francesco Locatelli;Gérard London

  • Illness representations and quality of life scores in haemodialysis patients

    Adrian Covic;Anca Seica;Paul Gusbeth-Tatomir;Ovidiu Gavrilovici

  • Monocyte subpopulations and cardiovascular risk in chronic kidney disease

    Gunnar H. Heine;Alberto Ortiz;Ziad A. Massy;Bengt Lindholm

  • Aortic pulse wave velocity and arterial wave reflections predict the extent and severity of coronary artery disease in chronic kidney disease patients.

    Covic A;Haydar Aa;Bhamra-Ariza P;Gusbeth-Tatomir P

  • Rifampicin-induced acute renal failure: a series of 60 patients.

    Adrian Covic;David J. A. Goldsmith;Liviu Segall;Cristian Stoicescu

Frequent Co-Authors

Adrian Covic
Adrian Covic Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy
Gérard M. London
Gérard M. London Grenoble Alpes University
Alberto Ortiz
Alberto Ortiz Autonomous University of Madrid
Ziad A. Massy
Ziad A. Massy Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines University
Danilo Fliser
Danilo Fliser Saarland University
Bengt Lindholm
Bengt Lindholm Karolinska Institute
Iain C. Macdougall
Iain C. Macdougall King's College London
Markus Ketteler
Markus Ketteler RWTH Aachen University
Francesco Locatelli
Francesco Locatelli University of Pavia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in healthcare careers beyond the traditional path of studying Medicine in the USA, there are flexible online options to consider. Accelerated programs, like direct entry MSN online degrees, allow individuals without nursing backgrounds to quickly transition into advanced nursing roles. These programs are popular for those seeking career change without a lengthy undergraduate nursing degree.

If you are concerned about admissions challenges, exploring nursing schools with high acceptance rates can increase your chances of starting a healthcare career. Such schools help reduce barriers to entry, making the nursing profession more accessible to diverse candidates.

Healthcare administration and support roles are also growing in demand. Many aspiring professionals find that starting with programs such as medical billing and coding financial aid options can lead to rewarding careers with viable online learning routes.

For those preferring practical, hands-on roles, consider an lpn program without teas test, which eliminates common exam requirements and streamlines your journey into the nursing field.

Best Scientists Citing David Goldsmith

Trending Scientists