World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 89 12588 11847 480 459 639 32421

Francesca Mallamaci publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Francesca Mallamaci between 1984 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Francesca Mallamaci published across 43 years, from 1984 to 2026, averaging 15.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 44 publications in 2023. 25 of the 662 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 44. Peak 44 publications in 2023. 1984: 1 publication 1985: 2 publications 1986: 5 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 1 publication 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 2 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 6 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 12 publications 2001: 11 publications 2002: 18 publications 2003: 11 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 22 publications 2006: 18 publications 2007: 16 publications 2008: 14 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 19 publications 2012: 22 publications 2013: 29 publications 2014: 26 publications 2015: 39 publications 2016: 34 publications 2017: 29 publications 2018: 37 publications 2019: 32 publications 2020: 33 publications 2021: 43 publications 2022: 23 publications 2023: 44 publications 2024: 39 publications 2025: 24 publications 2026: 1 publication
1984 2026

662 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Francesca Mallamaci: publications per year, 1984 to 2026
Year Publications
1984 1
1985 2
1986 5
1987 1
1988 1
1989 1
1990 0
1991 3
1992 1
1993 2
1994 3
1995 1
1996 6
1997 4
1998 4
1999 4
2000 12
2001 11
2002 18
2003 11
2004 9
2005 22
2006 18
2007 16
2008 14
2009 9
2010 9
2011 19
2012 22
2013 29
2014 26
2015 39
2016 34
2017 29
2018 37
2019 32
2020 33
2021 43
2022 23
2023 44
2024 39
2025 24
2026 1
Total 662
Download as CSV

Francesca Mallamaci publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Francesca Mallamaci sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 621–640 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 639 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386 639
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Francesca Mallamaci D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Francesca Mallamaci sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 88–89 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 89 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970 89
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Francesca Mallamaci is affiliated with the National Research Council (CNR) in Italy and has an extensive research background in medicine, with a focus on nephrology and cardiovascular medicine. Their publication record includes numerous contributions to key areas such as dialysis and renal disease management, blood pressure and hypertension studies, and chronic kidney disease and diabetes.

The scientist has authored papers published in several prominent journals, including:

  • Cardiovascular complications in chronic kidney disease: a review from the European Renal and Cardiovascular Medicine Working Group of the European Renal Association (2023) in Cardiovascular Research
  • Endothelial Dysfunction in Chronic Kidney Disease, from Biology to Clinical Outcomes: A 2020 Update (2020) in Journal of Clinical Medicine
  • Hyperuricemia and Risk of Cardiovascular Outcomes: The Experience of the URRAH (Uric Acid Right for Heart Health) Project (2020) in High Blood Pressure & Cardiovascular Prevention
  • The 2020 Italian Society of Arterial Hypertension (SIIA) practical guidelines for the management of primary aldosteronism (2020) in International Journal of Cardiology Hypertension
  • Physical activity in chronic kidney disease and the EXerCise Introduction To Enhance trial (2020) in Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation

Frequent co-authors of Francesca Mallamaci include:

  • Carmine Zoccali
  • Giovanni Tripepi
  • Pantelis Sarafidis
  • Claudia Torino
  • Rocco Tripepi

Their work is often published in the following venues:

  • Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
  • Clinical Kidney Journal
  • Journal of Hypertension
  • Journal of Nephrology
  • Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology

Francesca Mallamaci's research spans several specific fields and subfields, including:

  • Medicine
  • Nephrology
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Surgery
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Epidemiology

The main topics of their research work focus on:

  • Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
  • Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
  • Gout, Hyperuricemia, Uric Acid
  • Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Ultrasound in Clinical Applications

Best Publications

  • A Prospective Study of the Prevalence of Primary Aldosteronism in 1,125 Hypertensive Patients

    Gian Paolo Rossi;Giampaolo Bernini;Chiara Caliumi;Giovambattista Desideri

  • Plasma concentration of asymmetrical dimethylarginine and mortality in patients with end-stage renal disease: A prospective study

    Carmine Zoccali;Stefanie M Bode-Böger;Francesca Mallamaci;Frank Antonio Benedetto

  • Adiponectin, Metabolic Risk Factors, and Cardiovascular Events among Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease

    Carmine Zoccali;Francesca Mallamaci;Giovanni Tripepi;Francesco Antonio Benedetto

  • Plasma Norepinephrine Predicts Survival and Incident Cardiovascular Events in Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease

    Carmine Zoccali;Francesca Mallamaci;Saverio Parlongo;Sebastiano Cutrupi

  • Atherosclerotic Renal Artery Stenosis: Epidemiology, Cardiovascular Outcomes, and Clinical Prediction Rules

    Carmine Zoccali;Francesca Mallamaci;Pietro Finocchiaro

  • Vitamin D levels and patient outcome in chronic kidney disease.

    Pietro Ravani;Fabio Malberti;Giovanni Tripepi;Paola Pecchini

  • Epidemiology, contributors to, and clinical trials of mortality risk in chronic kidney failure

    Alberto Ortiz;Adrian Covic;Danilo Fliser;Denis Fouque

  • Asymmetric Dimethylarginine, C-Reactive Protein, and Carotid Intima-Media Thickness in End-Stage Renal Disease

    Carmine Zoccali;Francesco Antonio Benedetto;Renke Maas;Francesca Mallamaci

  • Asymmetrical Dimethylarginine Predicts Progression to Dialysis and Death in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Competing Risks Modeling Approach

    Pietro Ravani;Giovanni Tripepi;Fabio Malberti;Sophie Testa

  • Left ventricular mass monitoring in the follow-up of dialysis patients: Prognostic value of left ventricular hypertrophy progression

    Carmine Zoccali;Francesco A. Benedetto;Francesca Mallamaci;Giovanni Tripepi

  • Cardiac Natriuretic Peptides Are Related to Left Ventricular Mass and Function and Predict Mortality in Dialysis Patients

    Carmine Zoccali;Francesca Mallamaci;Francesco Antonio Benedetto;Giovanni Tripepi

  • Prognostic Impact of the Indexation of Left Ventricular Mass in Patients Undergoing Dialysis

    Carmine Zoccali;Francesco Antonio Benedetto;Francesca Mallamaci;Giovanni Tripepi

  • Exercise in Patients on Dialysis: A Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial

    Fabio Manfredini;Francesca Mallamaci;Graziella D’Arrigo;Rossella Baggetta

  • Hyperhomocysteinemia predicts cardiovascular outcomes in hemodialysis patients.

    Francesca Mallamaci;Carmine Zoccali;Giovanni Tripepi;Isabella Fermo

  • Uric Acid and Endothelial Dysfunction in Essential Hypertension

    Carmine Zoccali;Raffaele Maio;Francesca Mallamaci;Giorgio Sesti

  • The systemic nature of CKD

    Carmine Zoccali;Raymond Vanholder;Ziad A. Massy;Alberto Ortiz

  • Chronic Fluid Overload and Mortality in ESRD

    Carmine Zoccali;Ulrich Moissl;Charles Chazot;Francesca Mallamaci

  • Inflammation is associated with carotid atherosclerosis in dialysis patients

    Carmine Zoccali;Francesco Antonio Benedetto;Francesca Mallamaci;Giovanni Tripepi

  • Traditional and emerging cardiovascular risk factors in end-stage renal disease

    Carmine Zoccali;Francesca Mallamaci;Giovanni Tripepi

  • Detection of pulmonary congestion by chest ultrasound in dialysis patients.

    Francesca Mallamaci;Francesco A. Benedetto;Rocco Tripepi;Stefania Rastelli

Frequent Co-Authors

Giovanni Tripepi
Giovanni Tripepi National Research Council (CNR)
Gérard M. London
Gérard M. London Grenoble Alpes University
Alberto Ortiz
Alberto Ortiz Autonomous University of Madrid
Gianfranco Parati
Gianfranco Parati University of Milano-Bicocca
Ziad A. Massy
Ziad A. Massy Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines University
Adrian Covic
Adrian Covic Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy
Guido Grassi
Guido Grassi University of Milano-Bicocca
Danilo Fliser
Danilo Fliser Saarland University
Claudio Ferri
Claudio Ferri University of L'Aquila

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in Medicine is just one path within the healthcare field. If you’re exploring alternative or complementary options, many flexible online degrees can support your goals and offer rewarding opportunities.

For those interested in patient care but looking for less traditional entry requirements, absn programs that don't require teas can provide a streamlined route into nursing. These programs help candidates bypass standardized testing barriers and start their nursing careers sooner.

If your strengths lie in leadership or managing healthcare organizations, consider an online healthcare management degree. These programs focus on developing administrative and business skills vital to running hospitals, clinics, and other health services.

Registered nurses aiming for advanced roles may benefit from adn to np bridge programs. These bridging pathways accelerate the journey toward becoming a Nurse Practitioner, expanding both your clinical expertise and career potential.

Additionally, for those passionate about health, wellness, and prevention, an online bachelor's degree in nutrition equips you to promote healthy lifestyles or pursue roles in dietetics, wellness coaching, and public health.

Best Scientists Citing Francesca Mallamaci

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles