World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 74 19292 18111 1736 1663 264 28412

Tom Meade publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Tom Meade between 1967 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Tom Meade published across 60 years, from 1967 to 2026, averaging 4.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 1992. 4 of the 271 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1967 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 1992. 1967: 1 publication 1968: 1 publication 1969: 0 publications 1970: 1 publication 1971: 0 publications 1972: 2 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 4 publications 1975: 6 publications 1976: 2 publications 1977: 11 publications 1978: 6 publications 1979: 10 publications 1980: 9 publications 1981: 11 publications 1982: 8 publications 1983: 9 publications 1984: 4 publications 1985: 8 publications 1986: 5 publications 1987: 12 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 9 publications 1990: 8 publications 1991: 15 publications 1992: 20 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 11 publications 1995: 14 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 0 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 1 publication 2018: 3 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 0 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 3 publications 2026: 1 publication
1967 2026

271 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Tom Meade: publications per year, 1967 to 2026
Year Publications
1967 1
1968 1
1969 0
1970 1
1971 0
1972 2
1973 0
1974 4
1975 6
1976 2
1977 11
1978 6
1979 10
1980 9
1981 11
1982 8
1983 9
1984 4
1985 8
1986 5
1987 12
1988 5
1989 9
1990 8
1991 15
1992 20
1993 5
1994 11
1995 14
1996 2
1997 2
1998 7
1999 8
2000 6
2001 5
2002 3
2003 2
2004 4
2005 1
2006 0
2007 5
2008 3
2009 3
2010 0
2011 3
2012 2
2013 0
2014 2
2015 2
2016 1
2017 1
2018 3
2019 2
2020 0
2021 2
2022 1
2023 0
2024 0
2025 3
2026 1
Total 271
Download as CSV

Tom Meade publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tom Meade sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 261–280 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 264 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722 264
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Tom Meade D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tom Meade sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 74–75 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574 74
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1996 - Fellow of the Royal Society, United Kingdom

Overview

Tom Meade is affiliated with the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on Medicine, with an emphasis on Nephrology, Archeology, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, and Parasitology.

Their scholarly work covers several main topics, including:

  • Acute Kidney Injury Research
  • Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation
  • Paleopathology and ancient diseases
  • Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
  • Parasitic Infections and Diagnostics

Key publications authored or coauthored by Tom Meade include:

  • Clinical Implementation of Urinary Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin Testing for Diagnosing Acute Kidney Injury in an Academic Tertiary Care Medical Centre, 2025, Kidney360
  • POS-072 A PROSPECTIVE AUDIT OF THE CLINICAL IMPLEMENTATION OF URINE NEUTROPHIL GELATINASE-ASSOCIATED LIPOCALIN (uNGAL) AS A BIOMARKER OF ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY IN HOSPITALISED PATIENTS, 2022, Kidney International Reports
  • Targeted pathogen profiling of ancient feces reveals common enteric infections in the Rio Zape Valley, 725-920 CE, 2025, PLoS ONE
  • Targeted pathogen profiling of ancient feces reveals common enteric infections in the Rio Zape Valley, 725-920 CE, 2025, UNC Libraries

Frequent coauthors in Meade's research include Jean Côté, Patrick J. Twomey, Patrick Murray, Drew Capone, and David Holcomb. These collaborations reflect interdisciplinary approaches spanning clinical nephrology and ancient pathogen profiling.

Publications by Meade often appear in venues such as Kidney360, Kidney International Reports, PLoS ONE, and UNC Libraries, indicating engagement with both contemporary clinical medicine and historical biological research domains.

In recognition of contributions to the scientific community, Tom Meade was awarded the title of Fellow of the Royal Society, United Kingdom, in 1996.

Best Publications

  • HAEMOSTATIC FUNCTION AND ISCHAEMIC HEART DISEASE: PRINCIPAL RESULTS OF THE NORTHWICK PARK HEART STUDY

    T.W Meade;Milica Brozovic;R.R Chakrabarti;A.P Haines

  • Respiratory Viruses, Symptoms, and Inflammatory Markers in Acute Exacerbations and Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

    Terence Seemungal;Rhian Harper-Owen;Angshu Bhowmik;Ivana Moric

  • Fibrinolytic activity, clotting factors, and long-term incidence of ischaemic heart disease in the Northwick Park Heart Study

    T.W Meade;V Ruddock;Y Stirling;R Chakrabarti

  • HÆMOSTATIC FUNCTION AND CARDIOVASCULAR DEATH: EARLY RESULTS OF A PROSPECTIVE STUDY

    T.W. Meade;R. Chakrabarti;A.P. Haines;W.R.S. North

  • SCORE2 risk prediction algorithms: new models to estimate 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease in Europe

    Steven Hageman;Lisa Pennells

  • Haemostasis in normal pregnancy.

    Yvonne Stirling;Linda Woolf;W R S North;M J Seghatchian

  • Seasonal variations of plasma fibrinogen and factor VII activity in the elderly: winter infections and death from cardiovascular disease

    P.R. Woodhouse;KayTee Khaw;M. Plummer;T.W. Meade

  • Fetal and infant growth and cardiovascular risk factors in women.

    C H D Fall;C Osmond;D J P Barker;P M S Clark

  • Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Are Accompanied by Elevations of Plasma Fibrinogen and Serum IL-6 Levels

    Jadwiga A. Wedzicha;Terence A. R. Seemungal;Peter K. MacCallum;Elizabeth A. Paul

  • EFFECTS OF CHANGES IN SMOKING AND OTHER CHARACTERISTICS ON CLOTTING FACTORS AND THE RISK OF ISCHAEMIC HEART DISEASE

    T.W. Meade;John Imeson;Yvonne Stirling

  • Characteristics affecting fibrinolytic activity and plasma fibrinogen concentrations.

    T W Meade;R Chakrabarti;A P Haines;W R North

  • Low back pain of mechanical origin: randomised comparison of chiropractic and hospital outpatient treatment.

    T W Meade;S Dyer;W Browne;J Townsend

  • FÆCAL BILE-ACIDS AND CLOSTRIDIA IN PATIENTS WITH CANCER OF THE LARGE BOWEL

    M.J. Hill;B.S. Drasar;R.E.O. Williams;T.W. Meade

  • How common are polycystic ovaries in normal women and what is their significance for the fertility of the population

    R. N. Clayton;V. Ogden;J. Hodgkinson;L. Worswick

  • Antithrombotic agents in coronary artery disease.

    Leon Resnekov;Juan Chediak;Jack Hirsh;H. Daniel Lewis

  • A common genetic polymorphism associated with lower coagulation factor VII levels in healthy individuals.

    F Green;C Kelleher;H Wilkes;A Temple

  • Progestogens and cardiovascular reactions associated with oral contraceptives and a comparison of the safety of 50- and 30-microgram oestrogen preparations.

    T W Meade;G Greenberg;S G Thompson

  • Epidemiological characteristics of platelet aggregability.

    T W Meade;M V Vickers;S G Thompson;Y Stirling

  • Hypertriglyceridaemia and hypercoagulability.

    H.C.R. Simpson;H.C.R. Simpson;T.W. Meade;T.W. Meade;Yvonne Stirling;Yvonne Stirling;J.I. Mann;J.I. Mann

  • Prevalence ofurinary incontinence

    Thelma M Thomas;T W Meade

Frequent Co-Authors

Jackie A. Cooper
Jackie A. Cooper University College London
Andy Haines
Andy Haines London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Hiroyasu Iso
Hiroyasu Iso Osaka University
Gerd Assmann
Gerd Assmann University of Münster
Simon G. Thompson
Simon G. Thompson University of Cambridge
John Danesh
John Danesh University of Cambridge
Eric J. Brunner
Eric J. Brunner University College London
Peter Willeit
Peter Willeit Innsbruck Medical University
Børge G. Nordestgaard
Børge G. Nordestgaard University of Copenhagen
Mark Woodward
Mark Woodward Imperial College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Medicine is just one of many dynamic career paths in healthcare. For those seeking alternative or complementary options, a variety of online degree programs provide flexibility and specialized training. For example, the online healthcare management degree is ideal for students interested in leadership or administrative roles within medical organizations.

Nursing professionals can advance their careers through bridge programs. An adn to np route enables registered nurses with associate degrees to progress toward becoming nurse practitioners, broadening their scope of practice and earning potential.

Diet and wellness are critical elements of healthcare. Earning a nutrition bachelor degree online is an excellent choice for those passionate about promoting healthy living and clinical nutrition.

For those focused on health leadership, it's important to consider accreditation. Many professionals pursue cahme accredited online healthcare administration programs to ensure their degree is both respected and career-ready.

Exploring these related educational pathways can open doors to rewarding and impactful careers throughout the healthcare spectrum.

Best Scientists Citing Tom Meade

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles