World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
93
Citations
37575
World Ranking
10768
National Ranking
1026

Peter J. Grant publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter J. Grant sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 468 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Peter J. Grant D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter J. Grant sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 93 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter J. Grant is affiliated with the University of Leeds in the United Kingdom. The primary field of study for this researcher is Medicine, with a focus on several subfields including Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Physiology, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, and Economics and Econometrics.

The scientist's research topics cover multiple areas related to diabetes and cardiovascular health. These include:

  • Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Diabetes Management and Research
  • Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
  • Dietary Effects on Health
  • Sleep and related disorders
  • Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment

Among recent scientific papers authored or co-authored by this researcher are:

  • "Guideline recommendations and the positioning of newer drugs in type 2 diabetes care" (2020), published in The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology
  • "Out-of-pocket and private pay in clinical genetic testing: A scoping review" (2021), published in Clinical Genetics
  • "Diabetes and coronary artery disease: not just a risk factor" (2020), published in Heart
  • "Aspirin, clopidogrel and prasugrel monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a double-blind randomised controlled trial of the effects on thrombotic markers and microRNA levels" (2020), published in Cardiovascular Diabetology
  • "Diabetes and atherothrombosis: The circadian rhythm and role of melatonin in vascular protection" (2020), published in Diabetes and Vascular Disease Research

Frequent collaborators in this researcher's work include:

  • Nikolaus Marx
  • Massimo Federici
  • Francesco Cosentino
  • Ramzi Ajjan
  • Juliane Hannemann

Key publication venues where the researcher has frequently contributed are:

  • Diabetes and Vascular Disease Research
  • The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology
  • Clinical Genetics
  • Cardiovascular Diabetology
  • Acta Diabetologica

The researcher has also contributed to book publications, including a work published by Cambridge University Press titled "The British Home Front and the First World War" in 2023.

Best Publications

  • 2019 ESC Guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases developed in collaboration with the EASD

    Francesco Cosentino;Peter J Grant;Victor Aboyans;Clifford J Bailey

  • ESC Guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases developed in collaboration with the EASD: the Task Force on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and developed in collaboration with the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD)

    Lars Ryden;Peter J. Grant;Stefan D. Anker;Christian Berne

  • Plasminogen-activator inhibitor type 1 and coronary artery disease.

    Hans P. Kohler;Peter J. Grant

  • Prasugrel versus clopidogrel for acute coronary syndromes without revascularization

    Matthew T. Roe;Paul W. Armstrong;Keith A.A. Fox;Harvey D. White

  • ESC guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases developed in collaboration with the EASD - summary.

    pre-diabetes Task Force on diabetes;Lars Rydén

  • Evaluation of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), its homologue ACE2 and neprilysin in angiotensin peptide metabolism

    Gillian I. Rice;Gillian I. Rice;Daniel A. Thomas;Peter J. Grant;Anthony J. Turner

  • Role of hemostatic gene polymorphisms in venous and arterial thrombotic disease.

    David A. Lane;Peter J. Grant

  • ESC Guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases developed in collaboration with the EASD. The Task Force on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and developed in collaboration with the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD)

    Lars Rydén;Peter J. Grant;Stefan D. Anker;Christian Berne

  • Circadian Rhythm and Sleep Disruption: Causes, Metabolic Consequences, and Countermeasures

    Gregory D. M. Potter;Debra J. Skene;Josephine Arendt;Janet E. Cade

  • Coagulation disorders and hemostasis in liver disease: Pathophysiology and critical assessment of current management

    Stephen H. Caldwell;Maureane Hoffman;Ton Lisman;B. Gail Macik

  • RAGE and arthritis: the G82S polymorphism amplifies the inflammatory response.

    M A Hofmann;S Drury;B I Hudson;M R Gleason

  • Role of factor XIII in fibrin clot formation and effects of genetic polymorphisms

    Robert A S Ariëns;Thung-Shenq Lai;Thung-Shenq Lai;Thung-Shenq Lai;John W Weisel;John W Weisel;John W Weisel;Charles S Greenberg;Charles S Greenberg;Charles S Greenberg

  • Association between polymorphisms in the Clock gene, obesity and the metabolic syndrome in man

    E M Scott;A M Carter;P J Grant

  • Identification, classification, and expression of RAGE gene splice variants

    Barry I. Hudson;Angela M. Carter;Evis Harja;Anastasia Z. Kalea

  • The factor XIII V34L polymorphism accelerates thrombin activation of factor XIII and affects cross-linked fibrin structure

    Robert A. S. Ariëns;Helen Philippou;Helen Philippou;Helen Philippou;Chandrasekaran Nagaswami;Chandrasekaran Nagaswami;Chandrasekaran Nagaswami;John W. Weisel;John W. Weisel;John W. Weisel

  • Association of a Common Polymorphism in the Factor XIII Gene with Myocardial Infarction

    Hans P. Kohler;Max H. Stickland;Nicholas Ossei-Gerning;Angela Carter

  • The genetics of haemostasis: a twin study

    Marlies de Lange;Harold Snieder;Robert A S Ariëns;Tim D Spector

  • Effects of Novel Polymorphisms in the RAGE Gene on Transcriptional Regulation and Their Association With Diabetic Retinopathy

    Barry I. Hudson;Max H. Stickland;T. Simon Futers;Peter J. Grant

  • 2019 ESC Guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases developed in collaboration with the EASD

    F Cosentino;P J Grant;V Aboyans;C J Bailey

  • The 2019 ESC Guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases developed in collaboration with the EASDNew features and the ‘Ten Commandments’ of the 2019 Guidelines are discussed by Professor Peter J. Grant and Professor Francesco Cosentino, the Task Force chairmen

    Peter J Grant;Francesco Cosentino

Frequent Co-Authors

Nikolaus Marx
Nikolaus Marx RWTH Aachen University
Tim D. Spector
Tim D. Spector King's College London
Francesco Cosentino
Francesco Cosentino Karolinska University Hospital
Gillian I. Rice
Gillian I. Rice University of Manchester
Rainer H. Böger
Rainer H. Böger Universität Hamburg
Jennifer H. Barrett
Jennifer H. Barrett University of Leeds
John W. Weisel
John W. Weisel University of Pennsylvania
Harold Snieder
Harold Snieder University Medical Center Groningen
Heikki V. Huikuri
Heikki V. Huikuri University of Oulu
David Lane
David Lane Imperial College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring careers in healthcare extends far beyond traditional medical degrees. Many students are now pursuing alternative and online pathways that offer flexibility and diverse options in the field. For those interested in administrative or technical roles, enrolling in the best medical billing and coding schools online can be a strong first step, especially for those seeking programs with financial aid.

For aspiring nurses who wish to advance their careers efficiently, there are lpn to rn programs without teas test requirements, removing a significant barrier for many students. Those looking to move into leadership or administrative roles can consider a healthcare administration degree offered through accelerated online programs.

Additionally, registered nurses aiming for advanced clinical roles can benefit from rn to np bridge programs, allowing them to become nurse practitioners more efficiently. These alternative online options make healthcare careers more accessible and dynamic for a wide range of students.

Best Scientists Citing Peter J. Grant

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles