World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
67
Citations
19053
World Ranking
1289
National Ranking
423

Todd A. Kuiken publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Todd A. Kuiken sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 186 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Todd A. Kuiken D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Todd A. Kuiken sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2016 - Fellow of the Indian National Academy of Engineering (INAE)

Best Publications

  • Targeted muscle reinnervation for real-time myoelectric control of multifunction artificial arms.

    Todd A. Kuiken;Guanglin Li;Blair A. Lock;Robert D. Lipschutz

  • Study of stability of time-domain features for electromyographic pattern recognition

    Dennis Tkach;Dennis Tkach;He Huang;He Huang;Todd A Kuiken;Todd A Kuiken

  • The use of targeted muscle reinnervation for improved myoelectric prosthesis control in a bilateral shoulder disarticulation amputee

    Todd A. Kuiken;G. A. Dumanian;R. D. Lipschutz;L. A. Miller

  • A Strategy for Identifying Locomotion Modes Using Surface Electromyography

    He Huang;T.A. Kuiken;R.D. Lipschutz

  • Targeted reinnervation for enhanced prosthetic arm function in a woman with a proximal amputation: a case study

    Todd A Kuiken;Todd A Kuiken;Laura A Miller;Laura A Miller;Robert D Lipschutz;Blair A Lock

  • Quantifying Pattern Recognition—Based Myoelectric Control of Multifunctional Transradial Prostheses

    Guanglin Li;Aimee E Schultz;Todd A Kuiken

  • Determining the Optimal Window Length for Pattern Recognition-Based Myoelectric Control: Balancing the Competing Effects of Classification Error and Controller Delay

    L H Smith;L J Hargrove;B A Lock;T A Kuiken

  • Targeted Muscle Reinnervation: A Novel Approach to Postamputation Neuroma Pain

    Jason M. Souza;Jennifer E. Cheesborough;Jason H. Ko;Mickey S. Cho

  • Robotic touch shifts perception of embodiment to a prosthesis in targeted reinnervation amputees

    Paul D. Marasco;Keehoon Kim;Keehoon Kim;James Edward Colgate;Michael A. Peshkin

  • Redirection of cutaneous sensation from the hand to the chest skin of human amputees with targeted reinnervation

    Todd A. Kuiken;Paul D. Marasco;Blair A. Lock;R. Norman Harden

  • Robotic Leg Control with EMG Decoding in an Amputee with Nerve Transfers

    Levi J. Hargrove;Ann M. Simon;Aaron J. Young;Robert D. Lipschutz

  • The Effects of Electrode Size and Orientation on the Sensitivity of Myoelectric Pattern Recognition Systems to Electrode Shift

    A. J. Young;L. J. Hargrove;T. A. Kuiken

  • Improving Myoelectric Pattern Recognition Robustness to Electrode Shift by Changing Interelectrode Distance and Electrode Configuration

    A. J. Young;L. J. Hargrove;T. A. Kuiken

  • Adaptive Pattern Recognition of Myoelectric Signals: Exploration of Conceptual Framework and Practical Algorithms

    J.W. Sensinger;B.A. Lock;T.A. Kuiken

  • Decoding a new neural-machine interface for control of artificial limbs

    Ping Zhou;Madeleine M. Lowery;Madeleine M. Lowery;Kevin B Englehart;He Huang

  • Target Achievement Control Test: Evaluating real-time myoelectric pattern-recognition control of multifunctional upper-limb prostheses

    Ann M. Simon;Levi J. Hargrove;Blair A. Lock;Todd A. Kuiken

  • Estimation of Human Ankle Impedance During the Stance Phase of Walking

    Elliott J. Rouse;Levi J. Hargrove;Eric J. Perreault;Todd A. Kuiken

  • Neural Interfaces for Control of Upper Limb Prostheses: The State of the Art and Future Possibilities

    Aimee E. Schultz;Todd A. Kuiken

  • Toward higher-performance bionic limbs for wider clinical use

    Dario Farina;Ivan Vujaklija;Rickard Brånemark;Rickard Brånemark;Anthony M J Bull

  • Proceedings of the first workshop on Peripheral Machine Interfaces: going beyond traditional surface electromyography

    Claudio Castellini;Panagiotis K. Artemiadis;Michael Wininger;Arash Ajoudani

  • An Analysis of EMG Electrode Configuration for Targeted Muscle Reinnervation Based Neural Machine Interface

    He Huang;Ping Zhou;Guanglin Li;T.A. Kuiken

  • Analysis of using EMG and mechanical sensors to enhance intent recognition in powered lower limb prostheses

    A J Young;T A Kuiken;T A Kuiken;L J Hargrove;L J Hargrove

  • The effect of subcutaneous fat on myoelectric signal amplitude and cross-talk.

    Todd A. Kuiken;M. M. Lowery;N. S. Stoykov

  • A multiple-layer finite-element model of the surface EMG signal

    M.M. Lowery;N.S. Stoykov;A. Taflove;T.A. Kuiken

  • Myoelectric Pattern Recognition Outperforms Direct Control for Transhumeral Amputees with Targeted Muscle Reinnervation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

    Levi J. Hargrove;Levi J. Hargrove;Laura A. Miller;Laura A. Miller;Kristi Turner;Todd A. Kuiken;Todd A. Kuiken

Frequent Co-Authors

Levi J. Hargrove
Levi J. Hargrove Northwestern University
Allen Taflove
Allen Taflove Northwestern University
Guanglin Li
Guanglin Li Chinese Academy of Sciences
R. Norman Harden
R. Norman Harden Northwestern University
Michael A. Peshkin
Michael A. Peshkin Northwestern University
Eric J. Perreault
Eric J. Perreault Northwestern University
Dario Farina
Dario Farina Imperial College London
Andrea Serino
Andrea Serino University Hospital of Lausanne
Derek G. Kamper
Derek G. Kamper University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Antonio Bicchi
Antonio Bicchi Italian Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As technology rapidly advances, many students are exploring diverse career paths that complement their engineering and technology studies. Pursuing online business degree programs accredited can offer foundational skills in management, finance, and entrepreneurship—valuable for those interested in leadership roles within tech-driven industries.

For professionals aiming to lead teams or organizations, organizational leadership master's programs develop strategic decision-making and communication strengths. These programs support career advancement beyond purely technical positions.

Those seeking higher-level management roles in engineering can benefit from an mba in operations management, which combines business acumen with process optimization and project leadership—skills that are highly sought after in technology sectors.

Flexible study options have also expanded with the availability of online mba programs online no gmat required. These programs remove traditional barriers, making advanced business education more accessible for busy professionals or international students.

Best Scientists Citing Todd A. Kuiken

Trending Scientists