World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Maura L. Furey

Maura L. Furey

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
49
Citations
16554
World Ranking
5551
National Ranking
78

Maura L. Furey publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maura L. Furey sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 127 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Maura L. Furey D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maura L. Furey sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Maura L. Furey is affiliated with Janssen (Belgium) and conducts research primarily in the fields of Neuroscience, Medicine, and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Their work spans multiple subfields, including Pharmacology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Biological Psychiatry, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

The main topics explored by this researcher focus on the Treatment of Major Depression, Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling, Tryptophan and brain disorders, Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior, Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology, Mental Health Research Topics, and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies.

Recent publications by Maura L. Furey include the following:

  • Effects of Mu-Opiate Receptor Gene Polymorphism rs1799971 (A118G) on the Antidepressant and Dissociation Responses in Esketamine Nasal Spray Clinical Trials, 2020, The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology
  • The antidepressant efficacy of the muscarinic antagonist scopolamine: Past findings and future directions, 2020, Advances in pharmacology
  • Ketamine Alters Electrophysiological Responses to Emotional Faces in Major Depressive Disorder, 2020, Journal of Affective Disorders

Frequent co-authors working alongside Maura L. Furey include:

  • Wayne C. Drevets
  • Ziad S. Saad
  • Derrek P. Hibar
  • Maggie Fedgchin
  • Vanina Popova

Publication venues where this researcher has contributed work are:

  • The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology
  • Advances in pharmacology
  • Journal of Affective Disorders

Best Publications

  • Distributed and Overlapping Representations of Faces and Objects in Ventral Temporal Cortex

    James V. Haxby;M. Ida Gobbini;Maura L. Furey;Alumit Ishai

  • Brain structural and functional abnormalities in mood disorders: implications for neurocircuitry models of depression

    Wayne C. Drevets;Joseph L. Price;Maura L. Furey

  • Beyond sensory images: Object-based representation in the human ventral pathway

    Pietro Pietrini;Maura L. Furey;Emiliano Ricciardi;M. Ida Gobbini

  • Antidepressant Efficacy of the Antimuscarinic Drug Scopolamine: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial

    Maura L. Furey;Wayne C. Drevets

  • Relationship between amygdala responses to masked faces and mood state and treatment in major depressive disorder.

    Teresa A. Victor;Maura L. Furey;Stephen J. Fromm;Arne Öhman

  • Association of premorbid intellectual function with cerebral metabolism in Alzheimer's disease: implications for the cognitive reserve hypothesis

    Gene E. Alexander;Maura L. Furey;Cheryl L. Grady;Pietro Pietrini

  • Altered brain functional connectivity and impaired short-term memory in Alzheimer's disease

    Cheryl L. Grady;Maura L. Furey;Pietro Pietrini;Barry Horwitz

  • Regional glucose metabolic abnormalities are not the result of atrophy in Alzheimer's disease

    Vicente Ibáñez;Pietro Pietrini;Gene E. Alexander;Maura L. Furey

  • Cholinergic enhancement and increased selectivity of perceptual processing during working memory.

    Maura L. Furey;Pietro Pietrini;James V. Haxby

  • Replication of scopolamine's antidepressant efficacy in major depressive disorder: a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

    Wayne C. Drevets;Maura L. Furey

  • Improvement in suicidal ideation after ketamine infusion: Relationship to reductions in depression and anxiety

    Elizabeth D. Ballard;Dawn F. Ionescu;Jennifer L. Vande Voort;Mark J. Niciu

  • Neural basis of abnormal response to negative feedback in unmedicated mood disorders

    Joana V. Taylor Tavares;Luke Clark;Maura L. Furey;Guy B. Williams

  • Antidepressant Effects of the Muscarinic Cholinergic Receptor Antagonist Scopolamine: A Review

    Wayne C. Drevets;Carlos A. Zarate;Maura L. Furey

  • Synaptic Potentiation Is Critical for Rapid Antidepressant Response to Ketamine in Treatment-Resistant Major Depression

    Brian R. Cornwell;Giacomo Salvadore;Giacomo Salvadore;Maura Furey;Craig A. Marquardt

  • Abnormal brain glucose metabolism in the delusional misidentification syndromes: A positron emission tomography study in Alzheimer disease

    Marc J. Mentis;Edward A. Weinstein;Barry Horwitz;Andrew R. McIntosh

  • Scopolamine Produces Larger Antidepressant and Antianxiety Effects in Women Than in Men

    Maura L Furey;Ashish Khanna;Elana M Hoffman;Wayne C Drevets

  • Dissociation of face-selective cortical responses by attention.

    Maura L. Furey;Topi Tanskanen;Michael S. Beauchamp;Sari Avikainen

  • Network analysis of PET-mapped visual pathways in Alzheimer type dementia

    Barry Horwitz;Anthony R. McIntosh;James V. Haxby;Maura Furey

  • Preferential metabolic involvement of visual cortical areas in a subtype of Alzheimer's disease: clinical implications.

    Pietro Pietrini;Pietro Pietrini;Maura L. Furey;Neill R. Graff-Radford;Ulderico Freo

  • Cholinergic enhancement improves performance on working memory by modulating the functional activity in distinct brain regions: a positron emission tomography regional cerebral blood flow study in healthy humans.

    Maura L Furey;Pietro Pietrini;Pietro Pietrini;Gene E Alexander;Mark B Schapiro

  • BrainSeq: Neurogenomics to Drive Novel Target Discovery for Neuropsychiatric Disorders

    Christian R. Schubert;Patricio O’Donnell;Jie Quan;Jens R. Wendland

Frequent Co-Authors

Pietro Pietrini
Pietro Pietrini IMT Institute for Advanced Studies Lucca
Gene E. Alexander
Gene E. Alexander University of Arizona
Mark B. Schapiro
Mark B. Schapiro Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Wayne C. Drevets
Wayne C. Drevets Johnson & Johnson (United States)
Carlos A. Zarate
Carlos A. Zarate National Institutes of Health
Emiliano Ricciardi
Emiliano Ricciardi IMT Institute for Advanced Studies Lucca
Marc J. Mentis
Marc J. Mentis New York University
Stanley I. Rapoport
Stanley I. Rapoport National Institutes of Health
Barry Horwitz
Barry Horwitz National Institutes of Health
James V. Haxby
James V. Haxby Dartmouth College

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens up diverse career pathways, many of which now offer accessible online degree options. One growing field is speech-language pathology (SLP), which combines psychology, communication, and healthcare. Professionals interested in this area should be aware that SLP certification and licensing differ by state.

For example, if you want to practice as an SLP in New Jersey, you must meet specific New Jersey slp certification requirements. Prospective SLPs in New Mexico should familiarize themselves with how to become a speech language pathologist in New Mexico. Similarly, there are unique slp requirements in New York and slp requirements in North Carolina.

Before choosing a program, research your intended career’s state-specific regulations. Many universities now offer online psychology and SLP programs, allowing greater flexibility. Combining your psychology studies with related degrees can broaden your employment options, from clinical settings to schools and research institutions.

Best Scientists Citing Maura L. Furey

Trending Scientists