World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 33 10403 9737 5459 4983 51 6711

Stephen J. Fromm publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Stephen J. Fromm between 2000 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Stephen J. Fromm published across 22 years, from 2000 to 2021, averaging 2.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2012. 1 of the 51 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2012. 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 6 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 1 publication 2016: 1 publication 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 1 publication
2000 2021

51 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Stephen J. Fromm: publications per year, 2000 to 2021
Year Publications
2000 1
2001 0
2002 2
2003 0
2004 1
2005 1
2006 6
2007 3
2008 7
2009 5
2010 2
2011 5
2012 10
2013 4
2014 1
2015 1
2016 1
2017 0
2018 0
2019 0
2020 0
2021 1
Total 51
Download as CSV

Stephen J. Fromm publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen J. Fromm sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 51–60 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 51 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138 51
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Stephen J. Fromm D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen J. Fromm sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702 33
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Stephen J. Fromm is affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Their research career is marked by activity within this prominent biomedical institution, reflecting a focus on health-related scientific inquiry.

No recent papers, frequent co-authors, or recurring publication venues have been noted, which limits detailed insight into their specific research outputs or collaborative networks.

No book publications or explicit main or subfields of study have been provided. Likewise, there are no specified main topics of work or awards attributed to Stephen J. Fromm in the available data.

Given the absence of detailed publication and research topic data, it is clear that the current profile primarily establishes the professional affiliation of Stephen J. Fromm without elaborating on their research specialization or scholarly contributions.

Best Publications

  • Hierarchical and asymmetric temporal sensitivity in human auditory cortices

    Anthony Boemio;Stephen Fromm;Allen Braun;David Poeppel

  • Abnormal Attention Modulation of Fear Circuit Function in Pediatric Generalized Anxiety Disorder

    Erin B. McClure;Christopher S. Monk;Eric E. Nelson;Jessica M. Parrish

  • Relationship between amygdala responses to masked faces and mood state and treatment in major depressive disorder.

    Teresa A. Victor;Maura L. Furey;Stephen J. Fromm;Arne Öhman

  • A developmental examination of amygdala response to facial expressions

    Amanda E. Guyer;Christopher S. Monk;Erin B. McClure-Tone;Eric E. Nelson

  • Amygdala and nucleus accumbens activation to emotional facial expressions in children and adolescents at risk for major depression

    Christopher S. Monk;Rachel G. Klein;Eva H. Telzer;Elizabeth A. Schroth

  • Amygdala Activation During Emotion Processing of Neutral Faces in Children With Severe Mood Dysregulation Versus ADHD or Bipolar Disorder

    Melissa A. Brotman;Brendan A. Rich;Amanda E. Guyer;Jessica R. Lunsford

  • Limbic Hyperactivation During Processing of Neutral Facial Expressions in Children with Bipolar Disorder

    Brendan A. Rich;Deborah T. Vinton;Roxann Roberson-Nay;Rebecca E. Hommer

  • Common and Distinct Amygdala-Function Perturbations in Depressed vs Anxious Adolescents

    Katja Beesdo;Jennifer Y.F. Lau;Amanda E. Guyer;Erin B. McClure-Tone;Erin B. McClure-Tone

  • Neural response to catecholamine depletion in unmedicated subjects with major depressive disorder in remission and healthy subjects.

    Gregor Hasler;Stephen Fromm;Paul J. Carlson;David A. Luckenbaugh

  • Serotonin Transporter Binding in Bipolar Disorder Assessed using [11C]DASB and Positron Emission Tomography

    Dara M. Cannon;Masanori Ichise;Stephen J. Fromm;Allison C. Nugent

  • Nucleus accumbens, thalamus and insula connectivity during incentive anticipation in typical adults and adolescents.

    Youngsun T. Cho;Stephen J. Fromm;Amanda E. Guyer;Allison Detloff

  • Cerebral blood flow in immediate and sustained anxiety.

    Gregor Hasler;Stephen Fromm;Ruben P. Alvarez;David A. Luckenbaugh

  • Neural circuitry engaged during unsuccessful motor inhibition in pediatric bipolar disorder.

    Ellen Leibenluft;Brendan A. Rich;B.A. Deborah T. Vinton;Eric E. Nelson

  • Neural connectivity in children with bipolar disorder: impairment in the face emotion processing circuit

    Brendan A. Rich;Stephen J. Fromm;Lisa H. Berghorst;Daniel P. Dickstein

  • Amygdala function and 5-HTT gene variants in adolescent anxiety and major depressive disorder.

    Jennifer Y.F. Lau;David Goldman;Beata Buzas;Stephen J. Fromm

  • The effects of tryptophan depletion on neural responses to emotional words in remitted depression.

    Jonathan P. Roiser;Jonathan P. Roiser;Jonathan P. Roiser;Jamey Levy;Stephen J. Fromm;Allison C. Nugent

  • Increased amygdala activity during successful memory encoding in adolescent major depressive disorder: An FMRI study.

    Roxann Roberson-Nay;Erin B. McClure;Christopher S. Monk;Eric E. Nelson

  • Functional anatomy of autobiographical memory recall deficits in depression

    K. D. Young;K. Erickson;A. C. Nugent;S. J. Fromm

  • Relating neuronal dynamics for auditory object processing to neuroimaging activity: a computational modeling and an fMRI study

    Fatima T. Husain;Malle A. Tagamets;Stephen J. Fromm;Allen R. Braun

  • The effect of acute tryptophan depletion on the neural correlates of emotional processing in healthy volunteers

    Jonathan P Roiser;Jamey Levy;Stephen J Fromm;Hongye Wang

  • Serotonin Transporter Binding in Bipolar Disorder Assessed using ( 11 C)DASB and Positron

    Dara M. Cannon;Masanori Ichise;Stephen J. Fromm;Allison C. Nugent

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel S. Pine
Daniel S. Pine National Institutes of Health
Ellen Leibenluft
Ellen Leibenluft National Institutes of Health
Wayne C. Drevets
Wayne C. Drevets Johnson & Johnson (United States)
Melissa A. Brotman
Melissa A. Brotman National Institutes of Health
Jonathan P. Roiser
Jonathan P. Roiser University College London
Gregor Hasler
Gregor Hasler University of Fribourg
Monique Ernst
Monique Ernst National Institutes of Health
Eric E. Nelson
Eric E. Nelson The Ohio State University
Amanda E. Guyer
Amanda E. Guyer University of California, Davis
Christopher S. Monk
Christopher S. Monk University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens doors to a range of rewarding careers, including Licensed Professional Counselor (LPC) roles. As online programs grow, it’s easier than ever to start your journey toward licensure while balancing other commitments.

However, requirements for becoming an LPC can vary significantly across states. For example, Colorado licensed professional counselor requirements include specific educational credentials, supervised experience, and passing relevant exams. In contrast, those interested in working in Connecticut need to familiarize themselves with lpc license requirements in Connecticut, which place emphasis on graduate-level coursework and post-degree supervision.

Students aiming for practice in Delaware or Florida should review the lpc license requirements in Delaware and lpc license requirements in Florida to ensure they meet state-specific guidelines. Choosing an accredited online degree program that closely matches your target state’s requirements is key to a smooth path toward licensure and a successful counseling career.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen J. Fromm

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles