World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
49
Citations
12367
World Ranking
5892
National Ranking
491

Stefan Geyer publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stefan Geyer sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 194 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Stefan Geyer D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stefan Geyer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stefan Geyer is a researcher affiliated with the Max Planck Society in Germany. Their scientific contributions span across multiple disciplines, primarily focusing on advanced neuroimaging and computational analysis techniques within medical research.

Their recent publication record includes works in several notable journals. These publications are:

  • "Superficial white matter imaging: Contrast mechanisms and whole-brain in vivo mapping" (2020, Science Advances)
  • "Mapping myelin in white matter with T1-weighted/T2-weighted maps: discrepancy with histology and other myelin MRI measures" (2023, Brain Structure and Function)
  • "High-resolution magnetization-transfer imaging of post-mortem marmoset brain: Comparisons with relaxometry and histology" (2023, NeuroImage)
  • "Towards a representative reference for MRI-based human axon radius assessment using light microscopy" (2022, NeuroImage)
  • "Mammillary body and hypothalamic volumes in mood disorders" (2022, Journal of Psychiatric Research)

The venues that frequently feature their work include:

  • NeuroImage
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Science Advances
  • Brain Structure and Function

Geyer's collaborations extend to several recurring coauthors, indicating a network of research partners across related fields. Frequent collaborators include:

  • Markus Morawski
  • Nikolaus Weiskopf
  • Katja Reimann
  • Laurin Mordhorst
  • Maria Morozova

Their research is positioned at the intersection of medicine and computer science, with a greater focus on medical applications. Key fields of study include:

  • Medicine
  • Computer Science

Within these disciplines, their subfields of expertise cover:

  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Biophysics
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Geyer's main research topics focus heavily on neuroimaging and image analysis methods. Their work encompasses:

  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Cell Image Analysis Techniques
  • Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Medical Imaging and Analysis
  • Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies

Best Publications

  • Imagery of voluntary movement of fingers, toes, and tongue activates corresponding body-part-specific motor representations

    H. Henrik Ehrsson;Stefan Geyer;Eiichi Naito

  • Two different areas within the primary motor cortex of man

    Stefan Geyer;Anders Ledberg;Axel Schleicher;Shigeo Kinomura

  • The human inferior parietal cortex: Cytoarchitectonic parcellation and interindividual variability

    Svenja Caspers;Stefan Geyer;Axel Schleicher;Hartmut Mohlberg

  • Myelin and iron concentration in the human brain: A quantitative study of MRI contrast

    Carsten Stüber;Markus Morawski;Markus Morawski;Andreas Schäfer;Christian Labadie;Christian Labadie

  • Areas 3a, 3b, and 1 of Human Primary Somatosensory Cortex: 1. Microstructural Organization and Interindividual Variability

    Stefan Geyer;Axel Schleicher;Karl Zilles

  • Functional neuroanatomy of the primate isocortical motor system.

    Stefan Geyer;Massimo Matelli;Giuseppe Luppino;Karl Zilles

  • Observer-Independent Method for Microstructural Parcellation of Cerebral Cortex: A Quantitative Approach to Cytoarchitectonics

    A. Schleicher;K. Amunts;S. Geyer;P. Morosan

  • Areas 3a, 3b, and 1 of Human Primary Somatosensory Cortex: 2. Spatial Normalization to Standard Anatomical Space

    Stefan Geyer;Thorsten Schormann;Hartmut Mohlberg;Karl Zilles

  • The human inferior parietal lobule in stereotaxic space

    Svenja Caspers;Simon B Eickhoff;Stefan Geyer;Filip Scheperjans

  • Illusory arm movements activate cortical motor areas: a positron emission tomography study.

    Eiichi Naito;H. Henrik Ehrsson;Stefan Geyer;Karl Zilles

  • Human somatosensory area 2: observer-independent cytoarchitectonic mapping, interindividual variability, and population map.

    Christian Grefkes;Stefan Geyer;Thorsten Schormann;Per E. Roland

  • Anatomically motivated modeling of cortical laminae

    Miriam Waehnert;Juliane Dinse;Marcel Weiss;Markus N. Streicher

  • Hierarchical Processing of Tactile Shape in the Human Brain

    Anna Bodegård;Stefan Geyer;Christian Grefkes;Karl Zilles

  • Variability and asymmetry in the human precentral motor system - A cytoarchitectonic and myeloarchitectonic brain mapping study

    J. Rademacher;U. Bürgel;S. Geyer;T. Schormann

  • Dominance of the Right Hemisphere and Role of Area 2 in Human Kinesthesia

    Eiichi Naito;Per E. Roland;Christian Grefkes;H. J. Choi

  • Microstructural parcellation of the human cerebral cortex: From Brodmann's post-mortem map to in vivo mapping with high-field magnetic resonance imaging

    Stefan H. Geyer;Marcel Weiss;Katja Reimann;Gabriele Lohmann

  • The Microstructural Border Between the Motor and the Cognitive Domain in the Human Cerebral Cortex

    Stefan Geyer

  • Fast reaction to different sensory modalities activates common fields in the motor areas, but the anterior cingulate cortex is involved in the speed of reaction

    Eiichi Naito;Shigeo Kinomura;Stefan Geyer;Ryuta Kawashima

  • Rhythm in disguise: Why singing may not hold the key to recovery from aphasia

    Benjamin Stahl;Sonja A. Kotz;Ilona Henseler;Robert Turner

  • Structural asymmetries in the human forebrain and the forebrain of non-human primates and rats.

    Karl Zilles;Andreas Dabringhaus;Stefan Geyer;Katrin Amunts

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert Turner
Robert Turner Max Planck Society
Karl Zilles
Karl Zilles Forschungszentrum Jülich
Per E. Roland
Per E. Roland University of Copenhagen
Pierre-Louis Bazin
Pierre-Louis Bazin University of Amsterdam
Peter Schönknecht
Peter Schönknecht Leipzig University
Ulrich Hegerl
Ulrich Hegerl Stiftung Deutsche Depressionshilfe
Markus Morawski
Markus Morawski Leipzig University
Katrin Amunts
Katrin Amunts Forschungszentrum Jülich
Giuseppe Luppino
Giuseppe Luppino University of Parma
Massimo Matelli
Massimo Matelli University of Parma

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Stefan Geyer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles