World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
59
Citations
13730
World Ranking
3074
National Ranking
56

John Munthe publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Munthe sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 145 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

John Munthe D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Munthe sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

John Munthe is affiliated with IVL - Swedish Environmental Research Institute in Sweden. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with extensive work in health, toxicology, and mutagenesis. They have also contributed to subfields including pollution, chemical health and safety, cancer research, and atmospheric science.

The research topics that John Munthe has explored include:

  • Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Mercury impact and mitigation studies
  • Chemical Safety and Risk Management
  • Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
  • Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
  • Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
  • Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology

John Munthe has published papers in several scientific venues, including:

  • Environmental Sciences Europe
  • Journal of Hazardous Materials
  • Biogeosciences
  • Atmospheric measurement techniques
  • Environmental Science & Technology

The following are selected recent papers authored or co-authored by John Munthe, detailing the paper title, year of publication, and publication venue:

  • The NORMAN Association and the European Partnership for Chemicals Risk Assessment (PARC): let's cooperate!, 2020, Environmental Sciences Europe
  • Computational material flow analysis for thousands of chemicals of emerging concern in European waters, 2020, Journal of Hazardous Materials
  • Mercury accumulation in leaves of different plant types - the significance of tissue age and specific leaf area, 2021, Biogeosciences
  • A field intercomparison of three passive air samplers for gaseous mercury in ambient air, 2021, Atmospheric measurement techniques
  • The Effects of Forest Harvesting on Total and Methylmercury Concentrations in Surface Waters Depend on Harvest Practices and Physical Site Characteristics, 2025, Environmental Science & Technology

Frequent co-authors collaborating with John Munthe include:

  • Werner Brack
  • Leo Posthuma
  • Jaroslav Slobodnı́k
  • Michelle Nerentorp
  • Carl P. J. Mitchell

Best Publications

  • Atmospheric mercury—An overview

    William H. Schroeder;John Munthe

  • Global emission of mercury to the atmosphere from anthropogenic sources in 2005 and projections to 2020

    E. G. Pacyna;J. M. Pacyna;K. Sundseth;J. Munthe

  • Towards the review of the European Union Water Framework Directive: Recommendations for more efficient assessment and management of chemical contamination in European surface water resources.

    Werner Brack;Werner Brack;Valeria Dulio;Marlene Ågerstrand;Ian Allan

  • Recovery of Mercury-Contaminated Fisheries

    John Munthe;R. A (Drew) Bodaly;Brian A. Branfireun;Charles T. Driscoll

  • Future water quality monitoring--adapting tools to deal with mixtures of pollutants in water resource management.

    Rolf Altenburger;Selim Ait-Aissa;Philipp Antczak;Thomas Backhaus

  • Vertical fluxes of volatile mercury over forest soil and lake surfaces in Sweden

    Z. F. Xiao;J. Munthe;W. H. Schroeder;O. Lindqvist

  • Atmospheric mercury concentrations observed at ground-based monitoring sites globally distributed in the framework of the GMOS network

    Francesca Sprovieri;Nicola Pirrone;Mariantonia Bencardino;Francesco D'Amore

  • The aqueous oxidation of elemental mercury by ozone

    John Munthe

  • Worldwide trend of atmospheric mercury since 1977

    Franz Slemr;Ernst-Günther Brunke;Ralf Ebinghaus;Christian Temme

  • Effect-based methods are key. The European Collaborative Project SOLUTIONS recommends integrating effect-based methods for diagnosis and monitoring of water quality

    Werner Brack;Selim Ait Aissa;Thomas Backhaus;Valeria Dulio

  • International field intercomparison measurements of atmospheric mercury species at Mace Head, Ireland

    R. Ebinghaus;S.G. Jennings;W.H. Schroeder;T. Berg

  • The SOLUTIONS project: challenges and responses for present and future emerging pollutants in land and water resources management.

    Werner Brack;Rolf Altenburger;Gerrit Schüürmann;Martin Krauss

  • Forestry practices increase mercury and methyl mercury output from boreal forest catchments.

    Petri Porvari;Matti Verta;John Munthe;Merja Haapanen

  • Atmospheric mercury species over central and Northern Europe. Model calculations and nordic air and precipitation network for 1987 and 1988

    G. Petersen;Å. Iverfeldt;J. Munthe

  • Intercomparison of methods for sampling and analysis of atmospheric mercury species

    J Munthe;I Wängberg;N Pirrone;Å Iverfeldt

  • Current and future levels of mercury atmospheric pollution on a global scale

    Jozef M. Pacyna;Jozef M. Pacyna;Oleg Travnikov;Francesco De Simone;Ian M. Hedgecock

  • Xylem sap as a pathway for total mercury and methylmercury transport from soils to tree canopy in the boreal forest

    Kevin H. Bishop;Ying-Hua Lee;John Munthe;Etienne Dambrine

  • Cycling of mercury between water, air, and soil compartments of the environment

    W. H. Schroeder;J. Munthe;O. Lindqvist

  • MECHANISMS OF DEPOSITION OF METHYLMERCURY AND MERCURY TO CONIFEROUS FORESTS

    John Munthe;Hans Hultberg;Åke Iverfeldt

  • THE AQUEOUS REDUCTION OF DIVALENT MERCURY BY SULFITE

    J. Munthe;Z. F. Xiao;O. Lindqvist

Frequent Co-Authors

Leo Posthuma
Leo Posthuma Radboud University
Werner Brack
Werner Brack Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Oliver Lindqvist
Oliver Lindqvist University of Gothenburg
Ralf Ebinghaus
Ralf Ebinghaus Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht Centre for Materials and Coastal Research
Jonas Sommar
Jonas Sommar Chinese Academy of Sciences
Jozef M. Pacyna
Jozef M. Pacyna AGH University of Science and Technology
Nicola Pirrone
Nicola Pirrone National Research Council (CNR)
Rolf Altenburger
Rolf Altenburger Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Juliane Hollender
Juliane Hollender Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology
Annemarie P. van Wezel
Annemarie P. van Wezel University of Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can broaden career options and skills. Programs in geology often complement environmental studies, with several top-ranked options available. If you want to learn more about these opportunities, consider checking out the online geology degrees that focus on earth systems, natural resource management, and environmental impact assessment.

Many students also look for flexible and affordable education options. An online general studies degree affordable program might be a great choice for those seeking a broad academic foundation before specializing in environmental disciplines. These programs often allow customization to include environmental topics.

For advanced professionals, pursuing further education such as a doctorate can open doors to leadership and research roles. Fully funded doctoral programs in related fields, like social work, show the potential for supported higher education paths. Explore options through listings like fully funded dsw programs to understand the range of available support and specialization.

Lastly, many begin their academic journey by choosing degrees that are manageable alongside other commitments. If you’re curious about starting with the what is the easiest bachelor's degree to get, this resource can guide you in selecting a program that fits your lifestyle while keeping doors open for environmental science careers.

Best Scientists Citing John Munthe

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles