World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 39 7608 7338 149 144 222 7508

Frans M. J. Willems publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Frans M. J. Willems between 1982 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Frans M. J. Willems published across 40 years, from 1982 to 2021, averaging 5.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2021. 26 of the 222 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2021. 1982: 1 publication 1983: 4 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 3 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 3 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 10 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 10 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 14 publications
1982 2021

222 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Frans M. J. Willems: publications per year, 1982 to 2021
Year Publications
1982 1
1983 4
1984 1
1985 1
1986 0
1987 2
1988 1
1989 3
1990 2
1991 1
1992 1
1993 3
1994 5
1995 3
1996 4
1997 8
1998 10
1999 6
2000 10
2001 5
2002 4
2003 5
2004 6
2005 4
2006 8
2007 7
2008 9
2009 6
2010 7
2011 3
2012 5
2013 6
2014 8
2015 7
2016 6
2017 12
2018 9
2019 13
2020 12
2021 14
Total 222
Download as CSV

Frans M. J. Willems publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frans M. J. Willems sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 218–227 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 222 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346 222
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Frans M. J. Willems D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frans M. J. Willems sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385 39
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2005 - IEEE Fellow For contributions to multi-user information theory.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Algorithm
  • Statistics
  • Electrical engineering

His primary areas of study are Algorithm, Communication channel, Decoding methods, Weighting and Theoretical computer science. In his study, which falls under the umbrella issue of Algorithm, Computational complexity theory is strongly linked to Upper and lower bounds. His Communication channel study combines topics in areas such as Control theory, Encoder, Mutual information, Information theory and Topology.

Frans M. J. Willems focuses mostly in the field of Decoding methods, narrowing it down to topics relating to Information hiding and, in certain cases, Coding, Dirty paper and Optical engineering. Specifically, his work in Weighting is concerned with the study of Context tree weighting. His Theoretical computer science research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Field, Distortion, Host and Shannon–Fano coding.

His most cited work include:

  • The context-tree weighting method: basic properties (828 citations)
  • The discrete memoryless multiple access channel with partially cooperating encoders (Corresp.) (262 citations)
  • The discrete memoryless multiple-access channel with cribbing encoders (235 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Frans M. J. Willems mainly investigates Algorithm, Decoding methods, Communication channel, Theoretical computer science and Topology. His research in Algorithm intersects with topics in Information theory, Coding and Binary number. His study explores the link between Decoding methods and topics such as Discrete mathematics that cross with problems in Block code.

His work deals with themes such as Encoder and Electronic engineering, which intersect with Communication channel. Frans M. J. Willems combines subjects such as Sequence and Variable-length code with his study of Theoretical computer science. Frans M. J. Willems is involved in the study of Topology that focuses on Upper and lower bounds in particular.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Algorithm (33.80%)
  • Decoding methods (21.76%)
  • Communication channel (18.52%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2016-2021)?

  • Algorithm (33.80%)
  • Communication channel (18.52%)
  • Topology (12.50%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Algorithm, Communication channel, Topology, Static random-access memory and Decoding methods are his primary areas of study. His Algorithm research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Amplitude, Theoretical computer science, Binary number and Power control. The study incorporates disciplines such as Encoder and Transmitter power output in addition to Communication channel.

His research on Topology focuses in particular on Upper and lower bounds. His research in Upper and lower bounds tackles topics such as Noise power which are related to areas like Computational complexity theory. His work is dedicated to discovering how Decoding methods, Optical communication are connected with Information theory and other disciplines.

Between 2016 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Achievable Information Rates for Fiber Optics: Applications and Computations (58 citations)
  • Enumerative Sphere Shaping for Wireless Communications With Short Packets (26 citations)
  • Introducing Enumerative Sphere Shaping for Optical Communication Systems With Short Blocklengths (26 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Statistics
  • Electrical engineering
  • Algorithm

Frans M. J. Willems mainly focuses on Decoding methods, Topology, Communication channel, Additive white Gaussian noise and Optical communication. Frans M. J. Willems has researched Decoding methods in several fields, including Entropy, Mutual information and Arithmetic. In his work, Encoder and Cryptography is strongly intertwined with Theoretical computer science, which is a subfield of Mutual information.

His Topology research incorporates elements of Matching, Forward error correction, Low-density parity-check code and Distribution. His Additive white Gaussian noise research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Code rate, Algorithm and Distribution. His research in Algorithm is mostly concerned with Computation.

Best Publications

  • The context-tree weighting method: basic properties

    F.M.J. Willems;Y.M. Shtarkov;T.J. Tjalkens

  • The discrete memoryless multiple access channel with partially cooperating encoders (Corresp.)

    F. Willems

  • Capacity bounds and constructions for reversible data-hiding

    T. Kalker;F.M.J. Willems

  • Achievable Information Rates for Fiber Optics: Applications and Computations

    Alex Alvarado;Tobias Fehenberger;Bin Chen;Frans M. J. Willems

  • The discrete memoryless multiple-access channel with cribbing encoders

    F. Willems;E. van der Meulen

  • Capacity bounds and constructions for reversible data-hiding

    Ton Kalker;Frans M. J. Willems

  • The context-tree weighting method: extensions

    F.M.J. Willems

  • Biometric Systems: Privacy and Secrecy Aspects

    T. Ignatenko;F.M.J. Willems

  • Information Leakage in Fuzzy Commitment Schemes

    Tanya Ignatenko;Frans M J Willems

  • Bit-Interleaved Coded Modulation Revisited: A Mismatched Decoding Perspective

    A. Martinez;A. Guillen i Fabregas;G. Caire;F. Willems

  • Coding for a binary independent piecewise-identically-distributed source

    F.M.J. Willems

  • Modeling and control of compressor flow instabilities

    F. Willems;B. de Jager

  • An iIlumination perspective on visible light communications

    Anagnostis Tsiatmas;Constant P. M. J. Baggen;Frans M. J. Willems;Jean-Paul M. G. Linnartz

  • The feedback capacity region of a class of discrete memoryless multiple access channels (Corresp.)

    F. Willems

  • On the capacity of a biometrical identification system

    F. Willems;T. Kalker;J. Goseling;J.-P. Linnartz

  • Context weighting for general finite-context sources

    F.M.J. Willems;Y.M. Shtarkov;T.J. Tjalkens

  • Introducing Enumerative Sphere Shaping for Optical Communication Systems With Short Blocklengths

    Abdelkerim Amari;Sebastiaan Goossens;Yunus Can Gultekin;Olga Vassilieva

  • Probabilistic Shaping for Finite Blocklengths: Distribution Matching and Sphere Shaping.

    Yunus Can Gültekin;Tobias Fehenberger;Alex Alvarado;Frans M. J. Willems

  • Embedding Information in Grayscale Images

    M. van Dijk;F.M.J. Willems

  • Secure Key Generation from Biased PUFs

    Roel Maes;Vincent van der Leest;Erik van der Sluis;Frans M. J. Willems

  • Estimating the Secrecy-Rate of Physical Unclonable Functions with the Context-Tree Weighting Method

    Tanya Ignatenko;Geert-jan Schrijen;Boris Skoric;Pim Tuyls

  • Communicating via a processing broadcast satellite

    A.D. Wyner;J.K. Wolf;F.M.J. Willems

Frequent Co-Authors

Alex Alvarado
Alex Alvarado Eindhoven University of Technology
Ashish Pandharipande
Ashish Pandharipande Eindhoven University of Technology
Ton Kalker
Ton Kalker Hewlett-Packard (United States)
Giuseppe Caire
Giuseppe Caire Technical University of Berlin
Jean-Paul M. G. Linnartz
Jean-Paul M. G. Linnartz Eindhoven University of Technology
Pim Theo Tuyls
Pim Theo Tuyls Philips (Finland)
A.M.J. Koonen
A.M.J. Koonen Eindhoven University of Technology
Olav Egeland
Olav Egeland Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Alexander Yarovoy
Alexander Yarovoy Delft University of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Engineering and Technology in the USA opens doors to a wide range of related online degree programs and future career pathways. As fields become more interdisciplinary, students may enhance their credentials by pursuing specialized degrees that complement technical expertise.

For those interested in leadership roles or business management, the cheapest aacsb accredited online mba programs offer recognized, flexible options to acquire top business skills. If your interests lean toward human resources, pursuing the cheapest online master's in human resources can help you manage and lead teams effectively in tech-driven workplaces.

Individuals looking to branch into legal aspects or regulatory compliance might consider aba-approved online paralegal programs. Likewise, those curious about the fusion of technology with customer experience can look into a hospitality management degree online. These related degrees can broaden your career opportunities within or alongside the fast-growing fields of Engineering and Technology.

Best Scientists Citing Frans M. J. Willems

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles