World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
39
Citations
7508
World Ranking
7608
National Ranking
149

Frans M. J. Willems publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frans M. J. Willems sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 222 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Frans M. J. Willems D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frans M. J. Willems sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2005 - IEEE Fellow For contributions to multi-user information theory.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Algorithm
  • Statistics
  • Electrical engineering

His primary areas of study are Algorithm, Communication channel, Decoding methods, Weighting and Theoretical computer science. In his study, which falls under the umbrella issue of Algorithm, Computational complexity theory is strongly linked to Upper and lower bounds. His Communication channel study combines topics in areas such as Control theory, Encoder, Mutual information, Information theory and Topology.

Frans M. J. Willems focuses mostly in the field of Decoding methods, narrowing it down to topics relating to Information hiding and, in certain cases, Coding, Dirty paper and Optical engineering. Specifically, his work in Weighting is concerned with the study of Context tree weighting. His Theoretical computer science research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Field, Distortion, Host and Shannon–Fano coding.

His most cited work include:

  • The context-tree weighting method: basic properties (828 citations)
  • The discrete memoryless multiple access channel with partially cooperating encoders (Corresp.) (262 citations)
  • The discrete memoryless multiple-access channel with cribbing encoders (235 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Frans M. J. Willems mainly investigates Algorithm, Decoding methods, Communication channel, Theoretical computer science and Topology. His research in Algorithm intersects with topics in Information theory, Coding and Binary number. His study explores the link between Decoding methods and topics such as Discrete mathematics that cross with problems in Block code.

His work deals with themes such as Encoder and Electronic engineering, which intersect with Communication channel. Frans M. J. Willems combines subjects such as Sequence and Variable-length code with his study of Theoretical computer science. Frans M. J. Willems is involved in the study of Topology that focuses on Upper and lower bounds in particular.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Algorithm (33.80%)
  • Decoding methods (21.76%)
  • Communication channel (18.52%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2016-2021)?

  • Algorithm (33.80%)
  • Communication channel (18.52%)
  • Topology (12.50%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Algorithm, Communication channel, Topology, Static random-access memory and Decoding methods are his primary areas of study. His Algorithm research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Amplitude, Theoretical computer science, Binary number and Power control. The study incorporates disciplines such as Encoder and Transmitter power output in addition to Communication channel.

His research on Topology focuses in particular on Upper and lower bounds. His research in Upper and lower bounds tackles topics such as Noise power which are related to areas like Computational complexity theory. His work is dedicated to discovering how Decoding methods, Optical communication are connected with Information theory and other disciplines.

Between 2016 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Achievable Information Rates for Fiber Optics: Applications and Computations (58 citations)
  • Enumerative Sphere Shaping for Wireless Communications With Short Packets (26 citations)
  • Introducing Enumerative Sphere Shaping for Optical Communication Systems With Short Blocklengths (26 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Statistics
  • Electrical engineering
  • Algorithm

Frans M. J. Willems mainly focuses on Decoding methods, Topology, Communication channel, Additive white Gaussian noise and Optical communication. Frans M. J. Willems has researched Decoding methods in several fields, including Entropy, Mutual information and Arithmetic. In his work, Encoder and Cryptography is strongly intertwined with Theoretical computer science, which is a subfield of Mutual information.

His Topology research incorporates elements of Matching, Forward error correction, Low-density parity-check code and Distribution. His Additive white Gaussian noise research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Code rate, Algorithm and Distribution. His research in Algorithm is mostly concerned with Computation.

Best Publications

  • The context-tree weighting method: basic properties

    F.M.J. Willems;Y.M. Shtarkov;T.J. Tjalkens

  • The discrete memoryless multiple access channel with partially cooperating encoders (Corresp.)

    F. Willems

  • Capacity bounds and constructions for reversible data-hiding

    T. Kalker;F.M.J. Willems

  • Achievable Information Rates for Fiber Optics: Applications and Computations

    Alex Alvarado;Tobias Fehenberger;Bin Chen;Frans M. J. Willems

  • The discrete memoryless multiple-access channel with cribbing encoders

    F. Willems;E. van der Meulen

  • Capacity bounds and constructions for reversible data-hiding

    Ton Kalker;Frans M. J. Willems

  • The context-tree weighting method: extensions

    F.M.J. Willems

  • Biometric Systems: Privacy and Secrecy Aspects

    T. Ignatenko;F.M.J. Willems

  • Information Leakage in Fuzzy Commitment Schemes

    Tanya Ignatenko;Frans M J Willems

  • Bit-Interleaved Coded Modulation Revisited: A Mismatched Decoding Perspective

    A. Martinez;A. Guillen i Fabregas;G. Caire;F. Willems

  • Coding for a binary independent piecewise-identically-distributed source

    F.M.J. Willems

  • Modeling and control of compressor flow instabilities

    F. Willems;B. de Jager

  • An iIlumination perspective on visible light communications

    Anagnostis Tsiatmas;Constant P. M. J. Baggen;Frans M. J. Willems;Jean-Paul M. G. Linnartz

  • The feedback capacity region of a class of discrete memoryless multiple access channels (Corresp.)

    F. Willems

  • On the capacity of a biometrical identification system

    F. Willems;T. Kalker;J. Goseling;J.-P. Linnartz

  • Context weighting for general finite-context sources

    F.M.J. Willems;Y.M. Shtarkov;T.J. Tjalkens

  • Introducing Enumerative Sphere Shaping for Optical Communication Systems With Short Blocklengths

    Abdelkerim Amari;Sebastiaan Goossens;Yunus Can Gultekin;Olga Vassilieva

  • Probabilistic Shaping for Finite Blocklengths: Distribution Matching and Sphere Shaping.

    Yunus Can Gültekin;Tobias Fehenberger;Alex Alvarado;Frans M. J. Willems

  • Embedding Information in Grayscale Images

    M. van Dijk;F.M.J. Willems

  • Secure Key Generation from Biased PUFs

    Roel Maes;Vincent van der Leest;Erik van der Sluis;Frans M. J. Willems

  • Estimating the Secrecy-Rate of Physical Unclonable Functions with the Context-Tree Weighting Method

    Tanya Ignatenko;Geert-jan Schrijen;Boris Skoric;Pim Tuyls

  • Communicating via a processing broadcast satellite

    A.D. Wyner;J.K. Wolf;F.M.J. Willems

Frequent Co-Authors

Alex Alvarado
Alex Alvarado Eindhoven University of Technology
Ashish Pandharipande
Ashish Pandharipande Eindhoven University of Technology
Ton Kalker
Ton Kalker Hewlett-Packard (United States)
Giuseppe Caire
Giuseppe Caire Technical University of Berlin
Jean-Paul M. G. Linnartz
Jean-Paul M. G. Linnartz Eindhoven University of Technology
Pim Theo Tuyls
Pim Theo Tuyls Philips (Finland)
A.M.J. Koonen
A.M.J. Koonen Eindhoven University of Technology
Olav Egeland
Olav Egeland Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Alexander Yarovoy
Alexander Yarovoy Delft University of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Engineering and Technology in the USA opens doors to a wide range of related online degree programs and future career pathways. As fields become more interdisciplinary, students may enhance their credentials by pursuing specialized degrees that complement technical expertise.

For those interested in leadership roles or business management, the cheapest aacsb accredited online mba programs offer recognized, flexible options to acquire top business skills. If your interests lean toward human resources, pursuing the cheapest online master's in human resources can help you manage and lead teams effectively in tech-driven workplaces.

Individuals looking to branch into legal aspects or regulatory compliance might consider aba-approved online paralegal programs. Likewise, those curious about the fusion of technology with customer experience can look into a hospitality management degree online. These related degrees can broaden your career opportunities within or alongside the fast-growing fields of Engineering and Technology.

Best Scientists Citing Frans M. J. Willems

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles