World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 42 4613 4263 2194 1990 140 11614

Meda Chesney-Lind publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Meda Chesney-Lind between 1973 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Meda Chesney-Lind published across 51 years, from 1973 to 2023, averaging 2.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2013. 3 of the 145 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1973 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2013. 1973: 1 publication 1974: 1 publication 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 1 publication 1983: 2 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 6 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 8 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 7 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 1 publication 2023: 2 publications
1973 2023

145 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Meda Chesney-Lind: publications per year, 1973 to 2023
Year Publications
1973 1
1974 1
1975 0
1976 0
1977 1
1978 1
1979 0
1980 0
1981 1
1982 1
1983 2
1984 0
1985 0
1986 2
1987 3
1988 2
1989 2
1990 0
1991 6
1992 2
1993 3
1994 2
1995 2
1996 1
1997 8
1998 2
1999 3
2000 5
2001 7
2002 3
2003 0
2004 1
2005 1
2006 7
2007 5
2008 3
2009 4
2010 2
2011 7
2012 4
2013 13
2014 3
2015 5
2016 3
2017 8
2018 6
2019 3
2020 5
2021 1
2022 1
2023 2
Total 145
Download as CSV

Meda Chesney-Lind publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Meda Chesney-Lind sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 134–143 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 140 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434 140
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Meda Chesney-Lind D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Meda Chesney-Lind sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313 42
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Meda Chesney-Lind is affiliated with the University of Hawaii at Manoa in the United States. Their research contributions primarily focus on social sciences, with a strong emphasis on sociology and political science. The scholar's work spans a range of topics related to criminal justice, sex work, intimate partner violence, reproductive health, sexual assault, crime patterns, and wildlife conservation.

The main topics covered by Chesney-Lind include:

  • Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Sex work and related issues
  • Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses

Frequent coauthors in their publications are:

  • Robert Merce
  • Syeda Tonima Hadi
  • Vera López
  • Marilyn Mcshane
  • Trey Williams

Chesney-Lind's recent papers include:

  • "Feminist criminology in an era of misogyny," 2020, published in Criminology
  • "Female "Deviance" and Pathways to Criminalization in Different Nations," 2020, Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice
  • "Critical Criminological Methods," 2021, The Encyclopedia of Research Methods in Criminology and Criminal Justice
  • "Book Review: Susan Dewey, Bonnie Zare, Catherine Connolly, Rhett Epler, and Rosemary Bratton, Outlaw Women: Prison, Rural Violence, and Poverty in the American West," 2020, Theory in Action
  • "Policing Sex in the Sunflower State: The Story of the Kansas State Industrial Farm for Women" by Nicole Perry, 2022, The Journal of Interdisciplinary History

The scholar's work has appeared frequently in the following venues:

  • Criminology
  • Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice
  • The Encyclopedia of Research Methods in Criminology and Criminal Justice
  • Theory in Action
  • The Journal of Interdisciplinary History

Best Publications

  • Feminism and criminology

    Kathleen Daly;Meda Chesney-Lind

  • The female offender girls, women, and crime

    Meda Chesney-Lind;Lisa Pasko

  • Girls, delinquency, and juvenile justice

    Meda Chesney-Lind;Randall G. Shelden

  • Invisible punishment : the collateral consequences of mass imprisonment

    Marc Mauer;Meda Chesney-Lind

  • Girls' Crime and Woman's Place: Toward a Feminist Model of Female Delinquency

    Meda Chesney-Lind

  • Patriarchy, Crime, and Justice: Feminist Criminology in an Era of Backlash

    Meda Chesney-Lind

  • “JUST EVERY MOTHER'S ANGEL”: An Analysis of Gender and Ethnic Variations in Youth Gang Membership

    Karen A. Joe;Meda Chesney-Lind

  • Beyond Bad Girls: Gender, Violence and Hype

    Meda Chesney-Lind;Katherine Irwin

  • Gender Bias and Juvenile Justice Revisited: A Multiyear Analysis

    John M. MacDonald;Meda Chesney-Lind

  • CRIMINALIZING VICTIMIZATION: THE UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES OF PRO-ARREST POLICIES FOR GIRLS AND WOMEN

    Meda Chesney-Lind

  • From invisible to incorrigible: The demonization of marginalized women and girls

    Meda Chesney-Lind;Michele Eliason

  • Judicial Paternalism and the Female Status Offender Training Women to Know Their Place

    Meda Chesney-Lind

  • Girls' Troubles, Girls' Delinquency, and Gender Responsive Programming: A Review

    Meda Chesney-Lind;Merry Morash;Tia Stevens

  • VISITORS AS VICTIMS Crimes Against Tourists in Hawaii

    Meda Chesney-Lind;Ian Y. Lind

  • Women Under Lock and Key: A View from the Inside:

    Meda Chesney-Lind;Noelie Rodriguez

  • "Women and Crime": The Female Offender

    Meda Chesney-Lind

  • Judicial Enforcement of the Female Sex Role: The Family Court and the Female Delinquent

    Meda Chesney-Lind

  • Global Risk Indicators and the Role of Gender in a Juvenile Detention Sample

    Stephen M. Gavazzi;Courtney M. Yarcheck;Meda Chesney-Lind

  • The female offender

    Meda Chesney-Lind

  • Girls in Jail

    Meda Chesney-Lind

Frequent Co-Authors

Merry Morash
Merry Morash Michigan State University
Kathleen Daly
Kathleen Daly Griffith University
Candace Kruttschnitt
Candace Kruttschnitt University of Toronto
John M. MacDonald
John M. MacDonald University of Pennsylvania
Darrell J. Steffensmeier
Darrell J. Steffensmeier Pennsylvania State University
Michele J. Eliason
Michele J. Eliason San Francisco State University
Barry C. Feld
Barry C. Feld University of Minnesota

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Social Sciences and Humanities opens doors to a wide variety of online degree options in the USA. Online programs offer flexibility, diverse specializations, and can often be completed faster than traditional on-campus degrees.

Cost is a key consideration. If you are interested in psychology, you might wonder how much does it cost to get a masters in psychology. Tuition varies, so it’s wise to compare programs and look for scholarships or financial aid.

If you are eager to earn a doctoral degree quickly, consider the fastest edd program online for a streamlined entry into educational leadership roles.

Accelerated degrees are also available. Some schools provide one year online masters programs that help you advance your education and career rapidly. If you’re just starting your academic journey, an accelerated bachelor's degree online lets you earn your qualification in less time than conventional programs.

Ultimately, these diverse pathways allow students to customize their education to fit their career goals, time constraints, and budgets in the dynamic fields of Social Sciences and Humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Meda Chesney-Lind

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles