World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
88
Citations
51134
World Ranking
12898
National Ranking
1207

Ian Chau publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ian Chau sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 636 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Ian Chau D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ian Chau sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ian Chau is affiliated with the Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust in the United Kingdom and has a significant body of work in oncology and related medical fields. Their research spans multiple areas within medicine, with a primary focus on cancer treatment and diagnostics.

The main field of study for Ian Chau is Medicine, with 575 publications. Subfields of their research include Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, and Cancer Research.

Ian Chau's research interests cover a variety of cancer-related topics, notably:

  • Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
  • Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
  • Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
  • Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Genetic factors in colorectal cancer

They have frequently published in several key journals, including:

  • Annals of Oncology (46 publications)
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (46 publications)
  • ESMO Open (7 publications)
  • British Journal of Haematology (7 publications)
  • Gastric Cancer (5 publications)

Ian Chau has collaborated extensively with other researchers. Frequent co-authors include:

  • David Cunningham (104 joint publications)
  • Naureen Starling (87 joint publications)
  • Ruwaida Begum (38 joint publications)
  • Sheela Rao (36 joint publications)
  • David Watkins (26 joint publications)

Selected recent papers by Ian Chau include:

  • Updated treatment recommendations for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from the ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines, 2021, Annals of Oncology
  • Assessment of Pembrolizumab Therapy for the Treatment of Microsatellite Instability-High Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer Among Patients in the KEYNOTE-059, KEYNOTE-061, and KEYNOTE-062 Clinical Trials, 2021, JAMA Oncology
  • Trastuzumab deruxtecan in patients in the USA and Europe with HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer with disease progression on or after a trastuzumab-containing regimen (DESTINY-Gastric02): primary and updated analyses from a single-arm, phase 2 study, 2023, The Lancet Oncology
  • Adaptive immunity and neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern following vaccination in patients with cancer: the CAPTURE study, 2021, Nature Cancer
  • MRI-Diagnosed Tumor Deposits and EMVI Status Have Superior Prognostic Accuracy to Current Clinical TNM Staging in Rectal Cancer, 2020, Annals of Surgery

Best Publications

  • Cetuximab monotherapy and cetuximab plus irinotecan in irinotecan-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.

    David Cunningham;Yves Humblet;Salvatore Siena;David Khayat

  • Management of Immune-Related Adverse Events in Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline

    Julie R. Brahmer;Christina Lacchetti;Bryan J. Schneider;Michael B. Atkins

  • Ramucirumab monotherapy for previously treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (REGARD): an international, randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

    Charles S Fuchs;Jiri Tomasek;Cho Jae Yong;Filip Dumitru

  • Vemurafenib in Multiple Nonmelanoma Cancers with BRAF V600 Mutations

    David M. Hyman;Igor Puzanov;Vivek Subbiah;Jason E. Faris

  • Patient-derived organoids model treatment response of metastatic gastrointestinal cancers

    Georgios Vlachogiannis;Somaieh Hedayat;Alexandra Vatsiou;Yann Jamin

  • Nivolumab alone and nivolumab plus ipilimumab in recurrent small-cell lung cancer (CheckMate 032): a multicentre, open-label, phase 1/2 trial

    Scott J. Antonia;José A. López-Martin;Johanna Bendell;Patrick A. Ott

  • Pembrolizumab versus paclitaxel for previously treated, advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (KEYNOTE-061): a randomised, open-label, controlled, phase 3 trial

    Kohei Shitara;Mustafa Özgüroğlu;Yung-Jue Bang;Maria Di Bartolomeo

  • Ramucirumab Versus Placebo as Second-Line Treatment in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Following First-Line Therapy With Sorafenib (REACH): A Randomised, Double-Blind, Multicentre, Phase 3 Trial

    Andrew X. Zhu;Joon Oh Park;Baek Yeol Ryoo;Chia Jui Yen

  • Phase III Randomized Comparison of Gemcitabine Versus Gemcitabine Plus Capecitabine in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

    David Cunningham;Ian Chau;Deborah D. Stocken;Juan W. Valle

  • Epirubicin, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine with or without panitumumab for patients with previously untreated advanced oesophagogastric cancer (REAL3): a randomised, open-label phase 3 trial

    Tom Waddell;Ian Chau;David Cunningham;David Gonzalez

  • FOLFIRINOX for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and patient-level meta-analysis

    Mustafa Suker;Berend R Beumer;Eran Sadot;Lysiane Marthey

  • Multivariate Prognostic Factor Analysis in Locally Advanced and Metastatic Esophago-Gastric Cancer—Pooled Analysis From Three Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trials Using Individual Patient Data

    Ian Chau;Andy R. Norman;David Cunningham;Justin S. Waters

  • Docetaxel versus active symptom control for refractory oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma (COUGAR-02) : an open-label, phase 3 randomised controlled trial

    Hugo E R Ford;Andrea Marshall;John A Bridgewater;Tobias Janowitz

  • Management of Immune-Related Adverse Events in Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy: ASCO Guideline Update.

    Bryan J Schneider;Jarushka Naidoo;Bianca D Santomasso;Christina Lacchetti

  • CheckMate-032 Study: Efficacy and Safety of Nivolumab and Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Patients With Metastatic Esophagogastric Cancer

    Yelena Y. Janjigian;Johanna Bendell;Emiliano Calvo;Joseph W. Kim

  • Neoadjuvant Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin Followed by Synchronous Chemoradiation and Total Mesorectal Excision in Magnetic Resonance Imaging–Defined Poor-Risk Rectal Cancer

    Ian Chau;Gina Brown;David Cunningham;Diana Tait

  • Multicenter Randomized Phase II Clinical Trial Comparing Neoadjuvant Oxaliplatin, Capecitabine, and Preoperative Radiotherapy With or Without Cetuximab Followed by Total Mesorectal Excision in Patients With High-Risk Rectal Cancer (EXPERT-C)

    Alice Dewdney;David Cunningham;Josep Tabernero;Jaume Capdevila

  • Panitumumab and irinotecan versus irinotecan alone for patients with KRAS wild-type, fluorouracil-resistant advanced colorectal cancer (PICCOLO): a prospectively stratified randomised trial.

    Matthew T Seymour;Sarah R Brown;Gary Middleton;Timothy Maughan

  • First-line selective internal radiotherapy plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer (FOXFIRE, SIRFLOX, and FOXFIRE-Global): a combined analysis of three multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trials

    Harpreet S Wasan;Peter Gibbs;Navesh K Sharma;Julien Taieb

  • Neoadjuvant capecitabine and oxaliplatin before chemoradiotherapy and total mesorectal excision in MRI-defined poor-risk rectal cancer: a phase 2 trial

    Yu Jo Chua;Yu Jo Chua;Yolanda Barbachano;David Cunningham;Jacqui R Oates

Frequent Co-Authors

David Cunningham
David Cunningham Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
Gina Brown
Gina Brown Imperial College London
Andrew Wotherspoon
Andrew Wotherspoon Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
Josep Tabernero
Josep Tabernero Vall d´Hebron Institute of Oncology
Bengt Glimelius
Bengt Glimelius Uppsala University
Johanna C. Bendell
Johanna C. Bendell Sarah Cannon Research Institute
A. R. Norman
A. R. Norman Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
Takuji Okusaka
Takuji Okusaka National Cancer Centre
Andrew X. Zhu
Andrew X. Zhu Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine doesn’t always mean following a single path. There are a variety of affordable online degrees and certification programs for those interested in healthcare, each offering unique career opportunities.

For medical professionals aiming for advanced practice and leadership roles, finding the cheapest dnp program can make pursuing a Doctor of Nursing Practice more accessible. Similarly, aspiring pharmacists can consider the cheapest online pharmacy school options to earn a respected qualification while managing costs.

If you prefer a technology-focused healthcare role, enrolling in a him associate degree online can be a smart move, preparing you for positions in health data and informatics. Additionally, quick-entry allied health careers are possible with programs like medical billing and coding online, which offer flexibility and fast-track training.

These diverse educational pathways provide great alternatives—whether you’re seeking advancement or an efficient entry into the healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing Ian Chau

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles