World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Biology and Biochemistry 76 4960 4579 2382 2140 275 26656

J. Joshua Smith publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by J. Joshua Smith between 1993 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. J. Joshua Smith published across 34 years, from 1993 to 2026, averaging 9.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 38 publications in 2021. 7 of the 319 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 38. Peak 38 publications in 2021. 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 2 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 27 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 30 publications 2018: 23 publications 2019: 34 publications 2020: 27 publications 2021: 38 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 6 publications 2026: 1 publication
1993 2026

319 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
J. Joshua Smith: publications per year, 1993 to 2026
Year Publications
1993 1
1994 0
1995 1
1996 1
1997 1
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 1
2002 2
2003 0
2004 3
2005 4
2006 2
2007 5
2008 6
2009 10
2010 14
2011 5
2012 14
2013 11
2014 13
2015 27
2016 18
2017 30
2018 23
2019 34
2020 27
2021 38
2022 5
2023 12
2024 4
2025 6
2026 1
Total 319
Download as CSV

J. Joshua Smith publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. Joshua Smith sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 1,028+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 980. Most scientists, 980, have 127–136 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 267–276 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientist 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientist 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 275 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 8
57–66 35
67–76 106
77–86 231
87–96 413
97–106 546
107–116 704
117–126 848
127–136 980
137–146 942
147–156 969
157–166 949
167–176 951
177–186 915
187–196 787
197–206 840
207–216 733
217–226 708
227–236 651
237–246 605
247–256 510
257–266 524
267–276 434 275
277–286 417
287–296 350
297–306 363
307–316 315
317–326 296
327–336 261
337–346 240
347–356 219
357–366 196
367–376 154
377–386 161
387–396 155
397–406 145
407–416 124
417–426 112
427–436 132
437–446 116
447–456 99
457–466 81
467–476 91
477–486 80
487–496 80
497–506 59
507–516 36
517–526 46
527–536 54
537–546 44
547–556 43
557–566 43
567–576 42
577–586 25
587–596 34
597–606 23
607–616 33
617–626 31
627–636 27
637–646 25
647–656 28
657–666 34
667–676 18
677–686 16
687–696 10
697–706 12
707–716 21
717–726 12
727–736 12
737–746 10
747–756 7
757–766 13
767–776 15
777–786 13
787–796 9
797–806 9
807–816 7
817–826 4
827–836 9
837–846 7
847–856 3
857–866 5
867–876 5
877–886 11
887–896 3
897–906 4
907–916 7
917–926 5
927–936 6
937–946 6
947–956 3
957–966 7
967–976 2
977–986 2
987–996 1
997–1,006 5
1,007–1,016 2
1,017–1,026 2
1,027 1
1,028+ 100
Download as CSV

J. Joshua Smith D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. Joshua Smith sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 65 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 167+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,253. Most scientists, 1,253, have 58–59 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 76–77 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 80
42–43 183
44–45 316
46–47 504
48–49 718
50–51 899
52–53 1,025
54–55 1,149
56–57 1,235
58–59 1,253
60–61 1,162
62–63 1,130
64–65 1,031
66–67 897
68–69 814
70–71 714
72–73 709
74–75 596
76–77 512 76
78–79 473
80–81 412
82–83 373
84–85 358
86–87 285
88–89 273
90–91 227
92–93 208
94–95 193
96–97 153
98–99 157
100–101 148
102–103 120
104–105 113
106–107 100
108–109 86
110–111 67
112–113 71
114–115 73
116–117 64
118–119 53
120–121 60
122–123 54
124–125 43
126–127 38
128–129 49
130–131 26
132–133 18
134–135 23
136–137 32
138–139 32
140–141 27
142–143 19
144–145 22
146–147 12
148–149 16
150–151 14
152–153 10
154–155 13
156–157 10
158–159 7
160–161 9
162–163 13
164–165 4
166 4
167+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

J. Joshua Smith is a researcher affiliated with Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in the United States. Their work primarily spans the field of Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with notable contributions in Molecular Biology, Genetics, Plant Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, and Cancer Research.

Their research frequently addresses topics including:

  • Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
  • Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
  • Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Aquaculture disease management and microbiota

J. Joshua Smith has published extensively, with notable recent papers such as:

  • "The giant axolotl genome uncovers the evolution, scaling, and transcriptional control of complex gene loci", 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "The hagfish genome and the evolution of vertebrates", 2024, Nature
  • "Early satellite cell communication creates a permissive environment for long-term muscle growth", 2021, iScience
  • "Programmed DNA Elimination in Vertebrates", 2020, Annual Review of Animal Biosciences
  • "Genomic islands of divergence infer a phenotypic landscape in Pacific lamprey", 2020, Molecular Ecology

Their publications have appeared in venues such as:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Nature Ecology & Evolution
  • Data in Brief
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

J. Joshua Smith's research collaborations include multiple co-authors with whom they have frequently published. These collaborators include:

  • Nataliya Timoshevskaya
  • S. Randal Voss
  • Vladimir A. Timoshevskiy
  • Ferdinand Marlétaz
  • Elise Parey

Best Publications

  • Nomograms in oncology: more than meets the eye

    Vinod P Balachandran;Mithat Gonen;J Joshua Smith;Ronald P DeMatteo

  • Small molecule activators of SIRT1 as therapeutics for the treatment of type 2 diabetes

    Jill C. Milne;Philip D. Lambert;Simon Schenk;David P. Carney

  • A selective inhibitor of EZH2 blocks H3K27 methylation and kills mutant lymphoma cells

    Sarah K Knutson;Tim J Wigle;Natalie M Warholic;Christopher J Sneeringer

  • The African coelacanth genome provides insights into tetrapod evolution

    Chris T. Amemiya;Chris T. Amemiya;Jessica Alfoldi;Alison P. Lee;Shaohua Fan

  • Sequencing of the sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) genome provides insights into vertebrate evolution

    Jeramiah J. Smith;Shigehiro Kuraku;Carson Holt;Tatjana Sauka-Spengler

  • Experimentally derived metastasis gene expression profile predicts recurrence and death in patients with colon cancer

    J. Joshua Smith;Natasha G. Deane;Fei Wu;Nipun B. Merchant

  • The spotted gar genome illuminates vertebrate evolution and facilitates human-teleost comparisons

    Ingo Braasch;Andrew R Gehrke;Jeramiah J Smith;Kazuhiko Kawasaki

  • Selective Inhibition of EZH2 by EPZ-6438 Leads to Potent Antitumor Activity in EZH2-Mutant Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

    Sarah K. Knutson;Satoshi Kawano;Yukinori Minoshima;Natalie M. Warholic

  • Adoption of Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

    Andrea Cercek;Campbell S.D. Roxburgh;Campbell S.D. Roxburgh;Paul Strombom;J. Joshua Smith

  • A selective inhibitor of PRMT5 with in vivo and in vitro potency in MCL models

    Elayne Chan-Penebre;Kristy G Kuplast;Christina R Majer;P Ann Boriack-Sjodin

  • SIRT1 Exerts Anti-Inflammatory Effects and Improves Insulin Sensitivity in Adipocytes

    Takeshi Yoshizaki;Jill C. Milne;Takeshi Imamura;Simon Schenk

  • Assessment of a Watch-and-Wait Strategy for Rectal Cancer in Patients With a Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Therapy

    J. Joshua Smith;Paul Strombom;Oliver S. Chow;Campbell S. Roxburgh;Campbell S. Roxburgh

  • A rectal cancer organoid platform to study individual responses to chemoradiation.

    Karuna Ganesh;Chao Wu;Kevin P. O’Rourke;Bryan C. Szeglin

  • Conserved role of SIRT1 orthologs in fasting-dependent inhibition of the lipid/cholesterol regulator SREBP

    Amy K. Walker;Fajun Yang;Fajun Yang;Karen Jiang;Jun Yuan Ji;Jun Yuan Ji

  • Organ Preservation in Rectal Adenocarcinoma: a phase II randomized controlled trial evaluating 3-year disease-free survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with chemoradiation plus induction or consolidation chemotherapy, and total mesorectal excision or nonoperative management

    J. Joshua Smith;Oliver S. Chow;Marc J. Gollub;Garrett M. Nash

  • The sea lamprey germline genome provides insights into programmed genome rearrangement and vertebrate evolution.

    Jeramiah J. Smith;Nataliya Timoshevskaya;Chengxi Ye;Carson Holt

  • Pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and mutational burden as biomarkers of tumor response to immune checkpoint inhibitors.

    Cristina Valero;Mark Lee;Douglas Hoen;Kate Weiss

  • Profiling of residual breast cancers after neoadjuvant chemotherapy identifies DUSP4 deficiency as a mechanism of drug resistance

    Justin M Balko;Rebecca S Cook;David B Vaught;María G Kuba

  • Small molecule activators of SIRT1 replicate signaling pathways triggered by calorie restriction in vivo

    Jesse J Smith;Renée Deehan Kenney;David J Gagne;Brian P Frushour

  • Rapid spread of invasive genes into a threatened native species

    Benjamin M. Fitzpatrick;Jarrett R. Johnson;D. Kevin Kump;Jeramiah J. Smith

Frequent Co-Authors

Julio Garcia-Aguilar
Julio Garcia-Aguilar Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Martin R. Weiser
Martin R. Weiser Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Philip B. Paty
Philip B. Paty Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Jose G. Guillem
Jose G. Guillem University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Jinru Shia
Jinru Shia Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Xi Chen
Xi Chen University of California, Davis
Robert A. Copeland
Robert A. Copeland Accent Therapeutics (United States)
Chris T. Amemiya
Chris T. Amemiya University of California, Merced
Leonard Saltz
Leonard Saltz Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Mithat Gonen
Mithat Gonen Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry opens doors to a variety of dynamic career paths, especially in healthcare and research. For students seeking advanced credentials, there are numerous online degree options that offer flexibility and specialization.

Those interested in leadership within healthcare can explore cahme-accredited online mha programs, which emphasize management skills for healthcare environments. Aspiring nurses looking to advance their practice without traditional on-site requirements may consider dnp online no clinicals programs.

For individuals focused on research or policy, earning a phd in healthcare management online can be a pivotal step toward academia or executive roles. Pharmacists or science graduates aiming for clinical and leadership opportunities may benefit from enrolling in an online pharmd program.

These online options allow students to advance their education and career prospects while balancing other commitments, setting a strong foundation for impactful roles in science, healthcare, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing J. Joshua Smith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles