World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
95
Citations
41292
World Ranking
9935
National Ranking
5113

Douglas W. Wilmore publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Douglas W. Wilmore sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 353 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Douglas W. Wilmore D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Douglas W. Wilmore sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 95 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1999 - Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)

Overview

Douglas W. Wilmore is affiliated with Brigham and Women's Hospital in the United States. Their work has appeared predominantly in the Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, which is a frequent venue for their publications.

The recent papers involving Wilmore include multiple "Issue Information" articles published between 2022 and 2023 in the Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition:

  • Issue Information, 2022, Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
  • Issue Information, 2023, Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
  • Issue Information, 2023, Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
  • Issue Information, 2023, Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
  • Issue Information, 2023, Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition

The scientist has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Marion F. Winkler
  • Lillian Banchik
  • Ronald L. Koretz
  • Ding-You Li
  • Khursheed N. Jeejeebhoy

Douglas W. Wilmore has been recognized by membership in the National Academy of Medicine (NAM), an honor received in 1999.

Best Publications

  • Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome.

    Henrik Kehlet;Douglas W Wilmore

  • Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery.

    Henrik Kehlet;Douglas W. Wilmore

  • Detection of circulating tumor necrosis factor after endotoxin administration.

    Hamish R. Michie;Kirk R. Manogue;David R. Spriggs;Arthur Revhaug

  • Long-term total parenteral nutrition with growth, development, and positive nitrogen balance.

    S J Dudrick;D W Wilmore;H M Vars;J E Rhoads

  • MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS IN FAST TRACK SURGERY

    Douglas W Wilmore;Henrik Kehlet

  • Is Glutamine a Conditionally Essential Amino Acid

    Janet M. Lacey;Douglas W. Wilmore

  • The gut: a central organ after surgical stress.

    D. W. Wilmore;R. J. Smith;S. T. O'dwyer;D. O. Jacobs

  • Circulating Interleukin-1 and Tumor Necrosis Factor in Septic Shock and Experimental Endotoxin Fever

    J.G. Cannon;R.G. Tompkins;J.A. Gelfand;H.R. Michie

  • Catecholamines: mediator of the hypermetabolic response to thermal injury.

    Douglas W. Wilmore;James M. Long;Arthur D. Mason;Robert W. Skreen

  • Clinical and metabolic efficacy of glutamine-supplemented parenteral nutrition after bone marrow transplantation. A randomized, double-blind, controlled study.

    Thomas R. Ziegler;Lorraine S. Young;Kathleen Benfell;Marc Scheltinga

  • Glutamine metabolism by the intestinal tract.

    Wiley W. Souba;Robert J. Smith;Douglas W. Wilmore

  • Fat boys get burned.

    DouglasW. Wilmore;BasilA. Pruitt

  • Combined hormonal infusion simulates the metabolic response to injury.

    Bessey Pq;Watters Jm;Aoki Tt;Wilmore Dw

  • A new treatment for patients with short-bowel syndrome. Growth hormone, glutamine, and a modified diet

    Theresa A. Byrne;Rebecca L. Persinger;Lorrie S. Young;Thomas R. Ziegler

  • Mechanisms of insulin resistance following injury.

    Preston R. Black;David C. Brooks;Palmer Q. Bessey;Robert R. Wolfe

  • Can intravenous feeding as the sole means of nutrition support growth in the child and restore weight loss in an adult? An affirmative answer.

    Stanley J. Dudrick;Douglas W. Wilmore;Harry M. Vars;Jonathan E. Rhoads

  • Catabolic illness. Strategies for enhancing recovery.

    Wilmore Dw

  • Increased Intestinal Permeability Associated With Infection in Burn Patients

    Thomas R. Ziegler;Robert J. Smith;Sarah T. O'Dwyer;Robert H. Demling

  • Production of interleukin-1-receptor antagonist during experimental endotoxaemia

    E.V. Granowitz;D.D. Poutsiaka;J.G. Cannon;S.M. Wolff

  • Recombinant Human Tumor Necrosis Factor Administered as a 24-Hour Intravenous Infusion. A Phase I and Pharmacologic Study

    David R. Spriggs;Matthew L. Sherman;Hamish Michie;Kristina A. Arthur

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas R. Ziegler
Thomas R. Ziegler Emory University
Charles A. Dinarello
Charles A. Dinarello University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
John A. Mannick
John A. Mannick Brigham and Women's Hospital
Basil A. Pruitt
Basil A. Pruitt The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Sheldon M. Wolff
Sheldon M. Wolff Tufts Medical Center
Henrik Kehlet
Henrik Kehlet Copenhagen University Hospital
Joseph H. Antin
Joseph H. Antin Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Bruce G. Robinson
Bruce G. Robinson University of Sydney
Marja A. Boermeester
Marja A. Boermeester University of Amsterdam
Jeffrey L. Browning
Jeffrey L. Browning Boston University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring careers in medicine goes beyond the traditional MD route. Many students discover fulfilling and flexible paths through online programs that cater to varied interests within healthcare. For example, licensed registered nurses seeking advanced roles can consider adn to msn bridge programs, allowing them to build on their current credentials and move into leadership or specialized positions.

Students interested in preventive medicine and health promotion may choose a nutritionist online degree, which opens doors to careers in dietary planning, wellness consulting, and community health initiatives.

For those passionate about the business side of healthcare, accredited online options are available as well. Pursuing online mha programs cahme accredited can lead to impactful roles in hospital administration or health services management.

Lastly, if you are a nurse looking to enhance your qualifications with minimal on-site requirements, the best online rn to bsn programs without clinical requirements offer a convenient way to advance your skills and credentials.

Best Scientists Citing Douglas W. Wilmore

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles