World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
87
Citations
24075
World Ranking
13768
National Ranking
6986

Kenneth A. Kudsk publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kenneth A. Kudsk sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 321 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Kenneth A. Kudsk D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kenneth A. Kudsk sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 87 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kenneth A. Kudsk is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States. Their recent research encompasses several publications primarily in the journal Nutrition in Clinical Practice, highlighting work related to nutrition support and clinical nutrition.

Recent papers authored or co-authored include:

  • A tale of two analyses: Administrative vs primary review of nutrition support team performance (2022, Nutrition in Clinical Practice)
  • Issue Information (2021, Nutrition in Clinical Practice)
  • Issue Information (2021, Nutrition in Clinical Practice)
  • Issue Information (2021, Nutrition in Clinical Practice)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Kudsk are:

  • Jeanette M. Hasse
  • Angela L. Bingham
  • Mary Marian
  • Jayshil Wa
  • Los Limketkai

The primary publication venue for Kudsk's work is Nutrition in Clinical Practice, with at least four publications appearing in this journal.

Kudsk's research spans subfields including:

  • Nutrition and Dietetics
  • Physiology
  • Surgery

The main topics covered by their work focus on:

  • Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Esophageal and GI Pathology

Best Publications

  • Enteral versus parenteral feeding. Effects on septic morbidity after blunt and penetrating abdominal trauma.

    Kenneth Kudsk;Martin Croce;Timothy Fabian;Gayle Minard

  • Effects of diurnal variation of gut microbes and high-fat feeding on host circadian clock function and metabolism.

    Vanessa Leone;Sean M. Gibbons;Sean M. Gibbons;Kristina Martinez;Alan L. Hutchison

  • Nonoperative management of blunt hepatic trauma is the treatment of choice for hemodynamically stable patients. Results of a prospective trial.

    Martin Croce;Timothy Fabian;Paul Menke;Lynda Waddle-Smith

  • Blunt carotid injury. Importance of early diagnosis and anticoagulant therapy.

    Timothy Fabian;Joe Patton;Martin Croce;Gayle Minard

  • p55 Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor Fusion Protein in the Treatment of Patients With Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial

    Edward Abraham;Michel P. Glauser;Thomas Butler;Jorge Garbino

  • A randomized trial of isonitrogenous enteral diets after severe trauma. An immune-enhancing diet reduces septic complications.

    Kenneth Kudsk;Gayle Minard;Martin Croce;Rex Brown

  • Blunt Hepatic Injury: A Paradigm Shift From Operative to Nonoperative Management in the 1990s

    Ajai K. Malhotra;Timothy C. Fabian;Martin A. Croce;Timothy J. Gavin

  • Clinical benefits of an immune-enhancing diet for early postinjury enteral feeding

    Frederick A. Moore;Ernest E. Moore;Kenneth A. Kudsk;Rex O. Brown

  • Planned ventral hernia. Staged management for acute abdominal wall defects

    Timothy Fabian;Martin Croce;F. Pritchard;Gayle Minard

  • Improved Success in Nonoperative Management of Blunt Splenic Injuries: Embolization of Splenic Artery Pseudoaneurysms

    K A Davis;T C Fabian;M A Croce;M L Gavant

  • Lenercept (p55 tumor necrosis factor receptor fusion protein) in severe sepsis and early septic shock: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase III trial with 1,342 patients.

    Edward Abraham;Pierre-François Laterre;Jorge Garbino;Susan Pingleton

  • A prospective analysis of diagnostic laparoscopy in trauma.

    T C Fabian;M A Croce;R M Stewart;F E Pritchard

  • Preoperative albumin and surgical site identify surgical risk for major postoperative complications.

    KA Kudsk;EA Tolley;RC DeWitt;PG Janu

  • Treatment of electrolyte disorders in adult patients in the intensive care unit

    Michael D. Kraft;Imad F. Btaiche;Gordon S. Sacks;Kenneth A. Kudsk

  • Effects of parenteral and enteral nutrition on gut-associated lymphoid tissue

    Jian Li;Kenneth A. Kudsk;Barbara Gocinski;Daniel Dent

  • Current aspects of mucosal immunology and its influence by nutrition.

    Kenneth A Kudsk

  • Hypocaloric enteral tube feeding in critically ill obese patients.

    Roland N Dickerson;Kathryn J Boschert;Kenneth A Kudsk;Rex O Brown

  • Management of blunt splenic trauma: computed tomographic contrast blush predicts failure of nonoperative management.

    M J Schurr;T C Fabian;M Gavant;M A Croce

  • Improved outcome with femur fractures: early vs. delayed fixation.

    Stephen Behrman;Timothy Fabian;Kenneth Kudsk;J. Taylor

  • The Surgical Infection Society guidelines on antimicrobial therapy for intra-abdominal infections: an executive summary.

    John E. Mazuski;Robert G. Sawyer;Avery B. Nathens;Joseph T. DiPiro

Frequent Co-Authors

Timothy C. Fabian
Timothy C. Fabian University of Tennessee Health Science Center
Martin A. Croce
Martin A. Croce University of Tennessee Health Science Center
Miles L. Epstein
Miles L. Epstein University of Wisconsin–Madison
Thomas R. Ziegler
Thomas R. Ziegler Emory University
Jess D. Reed
Jess D. Reed University of Wisconsin–Madison
Frederick A. Moore
Frederick A. Moore University of Florida
Dean P. Jones
Dean P. Jones Emory University
Jack A. Gilbert
Jack A. Gilbert University of California, San Diego
Edward Abraham
Edward Abraham University of Miami
Michael J. Schurr
Michael J. Schurr University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative pathways in medicine and healthcare can open diverse career possibilities. For those interested in nursing but lacking a prior degree in the field, online bsn programs for non nurses offer a flexible and accessible route to entering the profession. Many of these programs accommodate students from different academic backgrounds, allowing for a quicker transition.

If you’re considering a non-clinical healthcare career, medical billing and coding financial aid options make accredited online programs more affordable and accessible. These programs prepare students for vital administrative roles in the medical field, often without the rigorous science prerequisites of clinical tracks.

Worried about entrance tests? Some schools now accept students without requiring standardized exams. Discover whether do you have to take the teas test to get into nursing school applies to your preferred program.

For those interested in leadership or operational roles, healthcare administration degrees offer accelerated online pathways to advance within the fast-growing health sector.

Best Scientists Citing Kenneth A. Kudsk

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles