World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Anders Skogstad

Anders Skogstad

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
34
Citations
11066
World Ranking
10007
National Ranking
95

Anders Skogstad publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anders Skogstad sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 56 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Anders Skogstad D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anders Skogstad sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Anders Skogstad is affiliated with the University of Bergen in Norway and works primarily within the social sciences, with a significant focus on psychology. Their research spans several subfields, including sociology and political science, social psychology, organizational behavior and human resource management, clinical psychology, and radiological and ultrasound technology.

Their work addresses multiple topics related to workplace dynamics and interpersonal behavior, such as workplace violence and bullying, job satisfaction and organizational behavior, bullying, victimization and aggression, stalking, cyberstalking and harassment, personality traits and psychology, social and intergroup psychology, and leadership, courage and heroism studies.

Anders Skogstad has published research in a range of academic journals. Notable publication venues include:

  • European Management Journal
  • Applied Psychology
  • Work & Stress
  • Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology
  • Frontiers in Public Health

Some recent papers include:

  • "Daily work pressure and exposure to bullying-related negative acts: The role of daily transformational and laissez-faire leadership" (2020, European Management Journal)
  • "Neuroticism as an antecedent of abusive supervision and laissez-faire leadership in emergent leaders: The role of facets and agreeableness as a moderator" (2023, Applied Psychology)
  • "The role of leadership practices in the relationship between role stressors and exposure to bullying behaviours - a longitudinal moderated mediation design" (2023, Work & Stress)
  • "Does the number of perpetrators matter? An extension and re-analysis of workplace bullying as a risk factor for exclusion from working life" (2020, Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology)
  • "Linking Safety-Specific Leader Reward and Punishment Omission to Safety Compliance Behavior: The Role of Distributive Justice and Role Ambiguity" (2022, Frontiers in Public Health)

Collaboration features prominently in their work, with frequent coauthors including Ståle Einarsen, Kari Wik Ågotnes, Jørn Hetland, Olav Kjellevold Olsen, and Roar Espevik.

Best Publications

  • Destructive leadership behaviour: A definition and conceptual model.

    Ståle Einarsen;Merethe Schanke Aasland;Anders Skogstad

  • Bullying at work: Epidemiological findings in public and private organizations

    Ståle Einarsen;Anders Skogstad

  • The destructiveness of laissez-faire leadership behavior.

    Anders Skogstad;Ståle Einarsen;Torbjørn Torsheim;Merethe Schanke Aasland

  • Relationships between stressful work environments and bullying: Results of a large representative study

    Lars Johan Hauge;Anders Skogstad;Ståle Einarsen

  • The Prevalence of Destructive Leadership Behaviour

    Merethe Schanke Aasland;Anders Skogstad;Guy Notelaers;Morten Birkeland Nielsen

  • The relative impact of workplace bullying as a social stressor at work

    Lars Johan Hauge;Anders Skogstad;Ståle Einarsen

  • Individual and situational predictors of workplace bullying: Why do perpetrators engage in the bullying of others?

    Lars Johan Hauge;Anders Skogstad;Ståle Einarsen

  • Prevalence of workplace bullying in Norway: Comparisons across time and estimation methods

    Morten Birkeland Nielsen;Anders Skogstad;Stig Berge Matthiesen;Lars Glasø

  • Climate for conflict management, exposure to workplace bullying and work engagement: a moderated mediation analysis

    Ståle Einarsen;Anders Skogstad;Erlend Rørvik;Åshild Bjørke Lande

  • Is avoidant leadership a root cause of subordinate stress? Longitudinal relationships between laissez-faire leadership and role ambiguity

    Anders Skogstad;Jørn Hetland;Lars Glasø;Ståle Einarsen

  • Testing the Work Environment Hypothesis of Bullying on a Group Level of Analysis: Psychosocial Factors as Precursors of Observed Workplace Bullying

    Anders Skogstad;Torbjørn Torsheim;Ståle Einarsen;Lars Johan Hauge

  • Do they stay or do they go?: A longitudinal study of intentions to leave and exclusion from working life among targets of workplace bullying

    Mona Berthelsen;Anders Skogstad;Bjørn Lau;Ståle Einarsen

  • The oldest old, ADL, social network, and loneliness

    Margareth Bondevik;Anders Skogstad

  • The relative effects of constructive, laissez-faire, and tyrannical leadership on subordinate job satisfaction: Results from two prospective and representative studies.

    Anders Skogstad;Merethe Schanke Aasland;Morten Birkeland Nielsen;Jørn Hetland

  • Leadership and role stressors as departmental level predictors of workplace bullying.

    Lars Johan Hauge;Ståle Einarsen;Stein Knardahl;Bjørn Lau

  • Leadership, staffing and quality of care in nursing homes

    Anders Kvale Havig;Anders Kvale Havig;Anders Skogstad;Lars Erik Kjekshus;Tor Inge Romøren

  • ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGES: A PRECURSOR OF BULLYING AT WORK?

    Anders Skogstad;Stig Berge Matthiesen;Stale Einarsen

  • Beware the angry leader: Trait anger and trait anxiety as predictors of petty tyranny ☆

    Leo Kant;Leo Kant;Anders Skogstad;Torbjørn Torsheim;Ståle Einarsen

  • Workplace bullying, the development of job insecurity and the role of laissez-faire leadership: A two-wave moderated mediation study

    Mats Glambek;Anders Skogstad;Ståle Einarsen

  • Leadership and Learning Climate in a Work Setting

    Hilde Hetland;Anders Skogstad;Jørn Hetland;Aslaug Mikkelsen

  • Personality and Social Sciences The relative impact of workplace bullying as a social stressor at work

    Lars Johan Hauge;Anders Skogstad

Frequent Co-Authors

Ståle Einarsen
Ståle Einarsen University of Bergen
Morten Birkeland Nielsen
Morten Birkeland Nielsen National Institute of Occupational Health
Guy Notelaers
Guy Notelaers University of Bergen
Stig Berge Matthiesen
Stig Berge Matthiesen BI Norwegian Business School
Jørn Hetland
Jørn Hetland University of Bergen
Torbjørn Torsheim
Torbjørn Torsheim University of Bergen
Arnold B. Bakker
Arnold B. Bakker Erasmus University Rotterdam
Cecilie Schou Andreassen
Cecilie Schou Andreassen University of Bergen
Atle Dyregrov
Atle Dyregrov University of Bergen
Ståle Pallesen
Ståle Pallesen University of Bergen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA opens the door to a wide range of online degrees and career possibilities. Many students are drawn to roles like Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT), which require specialized education and certification. Each state and even city can have slightly different criteria for becoming an MFT, so understanding your goals and the requirements where you intend to practice is important.

For example, if you're interested in practicing in Seattle, you’ll need to be aware of the specific Seattle mft certification requirements. Similarly, pursuing this pathway in Spokane involves understanding how to become an mft in Spokane.

The process may differ further in other locations. For those interested in Missouri, it’s important to research how to become an mft in St. Louis. Meanwhile, Florida students should understand the St. Petersburg mft education requirements.

Choosing the right online degree and planning ahead can help you meet local licensure standards and excel in psychology-related careers across the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Anders Skogstad

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles