World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Business and Management

D-Index
41
Citations
11261
World Ranking
1555
National Ranking
661

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
40
Citations
11096
World Ranking
7165
National Ranking
1946

John Leslie King publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Leslie King sits on this spectrum.

35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientists 435 publications: 1 scientists 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35 publications 436+

This scientist: 185 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

John Leslie King D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Leslie King sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

Overview

John Leslie King is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas within technology and social sciences, focusing on intersections of human and technological systems, information management, and innovation.

Their recent publications include:

  • Metahuman systems = humans + machines that learn, 2020, Journal of Information Technology
  • How Domain Experts Work with Data: Situating Data Science in the Practices and Settings of Craftwork, 2022, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
  • Negotiating Repairedness: How Artifacts Under Repair Become Contingently Stabilized, 2021, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
  • Hear, Now, and in the Future: Transforming Hearing Aids Into Multipurpose Devices, 2021, Computer
  • Institutions, Infrastructures, and Innovation, 2021, Computer

John Leslie King's frequent co-authors include:

  • Hal Berghel (5 joint publications)
  • Robert Charette (5 joint publications)
  • Phillip G. Armour (4 joint publications)
  • Susan J. Winter (3 joint publications)
  • Ju Yeon Jung (2 joint publications)

Frequent publication venues where King has contributed include:

  • Computer (7 publications)
  • Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction (2 publications)
  • Harvard Dataverse (2 publications)
  • Journal of Information Technology (1 publication)
  • Negotiation Journal (1 publication)

Their work is situated within several subfields of study:

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Management of Technology and Innovation
  • Safety Research

Main topics addressed by King in research include:

  • Information Systems Theories and Implementation
  • Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Personal Information Management and User Behavior
  • Data Visualization and Analytics
  • Data Stream Mining Techniques
  • Open Source Software Innovations

Best Publications

  • Institutional Factors in Information Technology Innovation

    John Leslie King;Vijay Gurbaxani;Kenneth L. Kraemer;F. Warren McFarlan

  • Communications of the Association for Information Systems

    David Firth;John King;Hope Koch;Clayton Arlen Looney

  • Computer-based systems for cooperative work and group decision making

    Kenneth L. Kraemer;John Leslie King

  • Governance in the Blockchain Economy: A Framework and Research Agenda

    Roman Beck;Christoph Müller-Bloch;John Leslie King

  • Evolution and organizational information systems: an assessment of Nolan's stage model

    John Leslie King;Kenneth L. Kraemer

  • Centralized versus decentralized computing: organizational considerations and management options

    John Leslie King

  • Hardwiring Weak Ties: Interorganizational Computer-Mediated Communication, Occupational Communities, and Organizational Change

    Jeanne M. Pickering;John Leslie King

  • Cost-Benefit Analysis in Information Systems Development and Operation

    John Leslie King;Edward L. Schrems

  • Information Technology and Administrative Reform: Will E-Government Be Different?

    Kenneth L. Kraemer;John Leslie King

  • Nothing At The Center?: Academic Legitimacy in the Information Systems Field

    Kalle Lyytinen;John Leslie King

  • Computing and public organizations

    Kenneth L Kraemer;John Leslie King

  • Examining the computing and centralization debate

    Joey F. George;John L. King

  • The usefulness of computer-based information to public managers

    Kenneth L. Kraemer;James N. Danziger;Debora E. Dunkle;John L. King

  • Standard making: a critical research frontier for information systems research

    Kalle Lyytinen;John Leslie King

  • ECONOMIC-DEVELOPMENT, GOVERNMENT POLICY, AND THE DIFFUSION OF COMPUTING IN ASIA-PACIFIC COUNTRIES

    Kenneth L. Kraemer;Vijay Gurbaxani;John Leslie King

  • PAYOFFS FROM COMPUTERIZATION - LESSONS OVER TIME

    Alana Northrop;Kenneth L. Kraemer;Debora Dunkle;John Leslie King

  • Large-scale requirements analysis revisited: The need for understanding the political ecology of requirements engineering

    Mark Bergman;John Leslie King;Kalle Lyytinen

  • Routines as Shock Absorbers During Organizational Transformation: Integration, Control, and NASA’s Enterprise Information System

    Nicholas Berente;Kalle Lyytinen;Youngjin Yoo;John Leslie King

  • A representational scheme for analyzing information technology and organizational dependency

    John Tillquist;John Leslie King;Carson Woo

  • Reach and grasp

    John Leslie King;Kalle Lyytinen

  • Evol uti on and Organizational Information Systems: An Assessment of Nol an's Stage Model.

    John Leslie King;Kenneth L. Kraemer

  • Usefulness of Computer-Based Information to Public Managers

    Kenneth L. Kraemer;Jim Danziger;Debbie Dunkle;John L. King

Frequent Co-Authors

Kenneth L. Kraemer
Kenneth L. Kraemer University of California, Irvine
Kalle Lyytinen
Kalle Lyytinen Case Western Reserve University
Rob Kling
Rob Kling Indiana University
James Howison
James Howison The University of Texas at Austin
Joel West
Joel West Keck Graduate Institute
Jason Dedrick
Jason Dedrick Syracuse University
Joey F. George
Joey F. George Iowa State University
Jonathan Grudin
Jonathan Grudin University of Washington
Paul A. Pavlou
Paul A. Pavlou University of Miami
Ron Weber
Ron Weber Monash University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring business and management studies in the USA opens many career pathways, especially through flexible online degrees. Programs like an 2 year construction management degree give students industry-focused skills at an accelerated pace, ideal for those wanting to enter the workforce quickly.

Healthcare is another growth area, and enrolling in an online healthcare management degree can prepare you for leadership roles in hospitals or medical facilities without pausing your career. For learners eager to finish their degree fast, a fast track bachelor degree may allow completion in less time, often by transferring credits or taking intensive courses.

Cost is a key consideration for many students. Looking at online business degree courses from affordable colleges can reduce financial stress while still providing a quality education.

Ultimately, online business and management degrees offer the flexibility and specialization needed for today’s dynamic job market—helping you tailor your academic pathway to your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing John Leslie King

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles