World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 41 1555 1453 661 603 185 11261
Engineering and Technology 40 7165 6915 1946 1802 191 11096

John Leslie King publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by John Leslie King between 1966 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. John Leslie King published across 60 years, from 1966 to 2025, averaging 4.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2025. 22 of the 259 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1966 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2025. 1966: 1 publication 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 1 publication 1976: 1 publication 1977: 3 publications 1978: 5 publications 1979: 3 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 2 publications 1982: 6 publications 1983: 4 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 8 publications 1987: 6 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 7 publications 1993: 8 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 11 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 5 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 6 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 20 publications
1966 2025

259 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
John Leslie King: publications per year, 1966 to 2025
Year Publications
1966 1
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 1
1976 1
1977 3
1978 5
1979 3
1980 1
1981 2
1982 6
1983 4
1984 2
1985 1
1986 8
1987 6
1988 5
1989 4
1990 5
1991 5
1992 7
1993 8
1994 6
1995 11
1996 6
1997 3
1998 5
1999 3
2000 4
2001 1
2002 5
2003 5
2004 7
2005 5
2006 11
2007 6
2008 2
2009 1
2010 6
2011 5
2012 3
2013 9
2014 4
2015 3
2016 9
2017 12
2018 5
2019 3
2020 6
2021 4
2022 6
2023 3
2024 2
2025 20
Total 259
Download as CSV

John Leslie King publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Leslie King sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 185–189 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 185 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59 185
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

John Leslie King D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Leslie King sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97 41
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

John Leslie King is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas within technology and social sciences, focusing on intersections of human and technological systems, information management, and innovation.

Their recent publications include:

  • Metahuman systems = humans + machines that learn, 2020, Journal of Information Technology
  • How Domain Experts Work with Data: Situating Data Science in the Practices and Settings of Craftwork, 2022, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
  • Negotiating Repairedness: How Artifacts Under Repair Become Contingently Stabilized, 2021, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
  • Hear, Now, and in the Future: Transforming Hearing Aids Into Multipurpose Devices, 2021, Computer
  • Institutions, Infrastructures, and Innovation, 2021, Computer

John Leslie King's frequent co-authors include:

  • Hal Berghel (5 joint publications)
  • Robert Charette (5 joint publications)
  • Phillip G. Armour (4 joint publications)
  • Susan J. Winter (3 joint publications)
  • Ju Yeon Jung (2 joint publications)

Frequent publication venues where King has contributed include:

  • Computer (7 publications)
  • Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction (2 publications)
  • Harvard Dataverse (2 publications)
  • Journal of Information Technology (1 publication)
  • Negotiation Journal (1 publication)

Their work is situated within several subfields of study:

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Management of Technology and Innovation
  • Safety Research

Main topics addressed by King in research include:

  • Information Systems Theories and Implementation
  • Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Personal Information Management and User Behavior
  • Data Visualization and Analytics
  • Data Stream Mining Techniques
  • Open Source Software Innovations

Best Publications

  • Institutional Factors in Information Technology Innovation

    John Leslie King;Vijay Gurbaxani;Kenneth L. Kraemer;F. Warren McFarlan

  • Communications of the Association for Information Systems

    David Firth;John King;Hope Koch;Clayton Arlen Looney

  • Computer-based systems for cooperative work and group decision making

    Kenneth L. Kraemer;John Leslie King

  • Governance in the Blockchain Economy: A Framework and Research Agenda

    Roman Beck;Christoph Müller-Bloch;John Leslie King

  • Evolution and organizational information systems: an assessment of Nolan's stage model

    John Leslie King;Kenneth L. Kraemer

  • Centralized versus decentralized computing: organizational considerations and management options

    John Leslie King

  • Hardwiring Weak Ties: Interorganizational Computer-Mediated Communication, Occupational Communities, and Organizational Change

    Jeanne M. Pickering;John Leslie King

  • Cost-Benefit Analysis in Information Systems Development and Operation

    John Leslie King;Edward L. Schrems

  • Information Technology and Administrative Reform: Will E-Government Be Different?

    Kenneth L. Kraemer;John Leslie King

  • Nothing At The Center?: Academic Legitimacy in the Information Systems Field

    Kalle Lyytinen;John Leslie King

  • Computing and public organizations

    Kenneth L Kraemer;John Leslie King

  • Examining the computing and centralization debate

    Joey F. George;John L. King

  • The usefulness of computer-based information to public managers

    Kenneth L. Kraemer;James N. Danziger;Debora E. Dunkle;John L. King

  • Standard making: a critical research frontier for information systems research

    Kalle Lyytinen;John Leslie King

  • ECONOMIC-DEVELOPMENT, GOVERNMENT POLICY, AND THE DIFFUSION OF COMPUTING IN ASIA-PACIFIC COUNTRIES

    Kenneth L. Kraemer;Vijay Gurbaxani;John Leslie King

  • PAYOFFS FROM COMPUTERIZATION - LESSONS OVER TIME

    Alana Northrop;Kenneth L. Kraemer;Debora Dunkle;John Leslie King

  • Large-scale requirements analysis revisited: The need for understanding the political ecology of requirements engineering

    Mark Bergman;John Leslie King;Kalle Lyytinen

  • Routines as Shock Absorbers During Organizational Transformation: Integration, Control, and NASA’s Enterprise Information System

    Nicholas Berente;Kalle Lyytinen;Youngjin Yoo;John Leslie King

  • A representational scheme for analyzing information technology and organizational dependency

    John Tillquist;John Leslie King;Carson Woo

  • Reach and grasp

    John Leslie King;Kalle Lyytinen

  • Evol uti on and Organizational Information Systems: An Assessment of Nol an's Stage Model.

    John Leslie King;Kenneth L. Kraemer

  • Usefulness of Computer-Based Information to Public Managers

    Kenneth L. Kraemer;Jim Danziger;Debbie Dunkle;John L. King

Frequent Co-Authors

Kenneth L. Kraemer
Kenneth L. Kraemer University of California, Irvine
Kalle Lyytinen
Kalle Lyytinen Case Western Reserve University
Rob Kling
Rob Kling Indiana University
James Howison
James Howison The University of Texas at Austin
Joel West
Joel West Keck Graduate Institute
Jason Dedrick
Jason Dedrick Syracuse University
Joey F. George
Joey F. George Iowa State University
Jonathan Grudin
Jonathan Grudin University of Washington
Paul A. Pavlou
Paul A. Pavlou University of Miami
Ron Weber
Ron Weber Monash University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring business and management studies in the USA opens many career pathways, especially through flexible online degrees. Programs like an 2 year construction management degree give students industry-focused skills at an accelerated pace, ideal for those wanting to enter the workforce quickly.

Healthcare is another growth area, and enrolling in an online healthcare management degree can prepare you for leadership roles in hospitals or medical facilities without pausing your career. For learners eager to finish their degree fast, a fast track bachelor degree may allow completion in less time, often by transferring credits or taking intensive courses.

Cost is a key consideration for many students. Looking at online business degree courses from affordable colleges can reduce financial stress while still providing a quality education.

Ultimately, online business and management degrees offer the flexibility and specialization needed for today’s dynamic job market—helping you tailor your academic pathway to your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing John Leslie King

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles