World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
79
Citations
30068
World Ranking
4226
National Ranking
2069

Nikolaus Grigorieff publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nikolaus Grigorieff sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 228 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Nikolaus Grigorieff D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nikolaus Grigorieff sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nikolaus Grigorieff is affiliated with the Howard Hughes Medical Institute in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with significant contributions to subfields including Molecular Biology, Structural Biology, Surfaces, Coatings and Films, Radiation, and Electrical and Electronic Engineering.

The scientist has published extensively in topics related to Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications, Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques, RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms, Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques, Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis, RNA modifications and cancer, and Protein Structure and Dynamics.

Grigorieff's frequent co-authors include Johannes Elferich, Bronwyn A. Lucas, Pilar Cossio, Timothy Grant, and Lingli Kong.

They have contributed multiple articles to the following publication venues:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • eLife
  • Biophysical Journal
  • EMPIAR dataset
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Selected recent papers include:

  • Locating macromolecular assemblies in cells by 2D template matching with cisTEM, 2021, eLife
  • Structure and assembly of calcium homeostasis modulator proteins, 2020, Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
  • Structure of the Vesicular Stomatitis Virus L Protein in Complex with Its Phosphoprotein Cofactor, 2020, Cell Reports
  • Quantification of gallium cryo-FIB milling damage in biological lamellae, 2023, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • mRNA stem-loops can pause the ribosome by hindering A-site tRNA binding, 2020, eLife

Best Publications

  • CTFFIND4: Fast and accurate defocus estimation from electron micrographs.

    Alexis Rohou;Nikolaus Grigorieff

  • Accurate determination of local defocus and specimen tilt in electron microscopy

    Joseph A. Mindell;Nikolaus Grigorieff

  • A Common Mechanism Underlying Promiscuous Inhibitors from Virtual and High-Throughput Screening

    Susan Lynne McGovern;Emilia Caselli;Emilia Caselli;Nikolaus Grigorieff;Brian K. Shoichet

  • Electron-crystallographic refinement of the structure of bacteriorhodopsin.

    N. Grigorieff;N. Grigorieff;T.A. Ceska;T.A. Ceska;K.H. Downing;K.H. Downing;J.M. Baldwin;J.M. Baldwin

  • cisTEM, user-friendly software for single-particle image processing

    Timothy Grant;Alexis Rohou;Nikolaus Grigorieff

  • Measuring the optimal exposure for single particle cryo-EM using a 2.6 Å reconstruction of rotavirus VP6

    Timothy Grant;Nikolaus Grigorieff

  • Molecular model for a complete clathrin lattice from electron cryomicroscopy

    Alexander Fotin;Yifan Cheng;Piotr Sliz;Nikolaus Grigorieff

  • A primer to single-particle cryo-electron microscopy.

    Yifan Cheng;Nikolaus Grigorieff;Pawel A. Penczek;Thomas Walz

  • FREALIGN: high-resolution refinement of single particle structures.

    Nikolaus Grigorieff

  • Outcome of the First Electron Microscopy Validation Task Force Meeting

    Richard Henderson;Andrej Sali;Matthew L. Baker;Bridget Carragher

  • Purification and characterization of native spliceosomes suitable for three-dimensional structural analysis.

    Melissa S Jurica;Lawrence J Licklider;Steven R Gygi;Nikolaus Grigorieff

  • Beam-induced motion of vitrified specimen on holey carbon film.

    Axel F. Brilot;James Z. Chen;James Z. Chen;Anchi Cheng;Junhua Pan

  • Three-dimensional structure of bovine NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase (complex I) at 22 å in ice

    N Grigorieff

  • Near-atomic resolution using electron cryomicroscopy and single-particle reconstruction.

    Xing Zhang;Ethan Settembre;Chen Xu;Philip R. Dormitzer

  • The Ndc80 kinetochore complex forms oligomeric arrays along microtubules

    Gregory M. Alushin;Vincent H. Ramey;Sebastiano Pasqualato;David A. Ball

  • Atomic model of an infectious rotavirus particle.

    Ethan C Settembre;James Z Chen;Philip R Dormitzer;Nikolaus Grigorieff

  • Structural polymorphism of Alzheimer Aβ and other amyloid fibrils

    Marcus Fändrich;Jessica Meinhardt;Nikolaus Grigorieff

  • Aβ(1-40) Fibril Polymorphism Implies Diverse Interaction Patterns in Amyloid Fibrils

    Jessica Meinhardt;Carsten Sachse;Carsten Sachse;Peter Hortschansky;Nikolaus Grigorieff

  • Movies of Ice-Embedded Particles Enhance Resolution in Electron Cryo-Microscopy

    Melody G. Campbell;Anchi Cheng;Axel F. Brilot;Arne Moeller

  • Comparison of Alzheimer Aβ(1–40) and Aβ(1–42) amyloid fibrils reveals similar protofilament structures

    Matthias Schmidt;Carsten Sachse;Walter Richter;Chen Xu

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen C. Harrison
Stephen C. Harrison Harvard University
Marcus Fändrich
Marcus Fändrich University of Ulm
Thomas Walz
Thomas Walz Rockefeller University
Yifan Cheng
Yifan Cheng University of California, San Francisco
Philip R. Dormitzer
Philip R. Dormitzer Pfizer (United States)
John L. Rubinstein
John L. Rubinstein University of Toronto
Bruce L. Goode
Bruce L. Goode Brandeis University
Tomas Kirchhausen
Tomas Kirchhausen Boston Children's Hospital
Stephen J. Tucker
Stephen J. Tucker University of Oxford
Sean P. J. Whelan
Sean P. J. Whelan Washington University in St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens up diverse career options, many of which can be pursued through online education. For those considering technical health professions, exploring the best online radiology tech programs can lead to specialized roles in medical imaging—a high-demand field with flexible learning opportunities.

Nutrition and wellness is another growing area. Graduates interested in diet and health may find strong professional preparation by enrolling in the best dietitian programs, which offer pathways to become certified dietitians and nutritionists.

For those looking to quickly enter the healthcare workforce, there are accessible online medical assistant programs that accept financial aid, providing practical skills and the potential for advancement as you gain experience.

If you are already a certified medical assistant, you can advance your career through cma to lpn bridge programs online. These programs help medical assistants become licensed practical nurses, opening further job opportunities and higher salaries.

Best Scientists Citing Nikolaus Grigorieff

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles