World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
40
Citations
5046
World Ranking
9434
National Ranking
151

Yoram Reich publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Yoram Reich sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 200 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Yoram Reich D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Yoram Reich sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Yoram Reich is a researcher affiliated with Tel Aviv University in Israel. Their scholarly work is prominently situated in the fields of Engineering and Computer Science, with a particular emphasis on the subfields of Information Systems, Management of Technology and Innovation, Control and Systems Engineering, Management Science and Operations Research, and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality.

Their research covers a range of main topics including Software Engineering Techniques and Practices, Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications, Product Development and Customization, Design Education and Practice, Complex Systems and Decision Making, Technology Assessment and Management, and Business Process Modeling and Analysis.

Yoram Reich has contributed publications to a variety of academic venues. Frequently appearing publication venues include:

  • Research in Engineering Design
  • Proceedings of the Design Society
  • Systems
  • IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
  • Design Science

Among their recent papers are the following:

  • The PSI Framework and Theory of Design (2020), IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
  • We cannot play 20 questions with creativity and innovation and win: the necessity of practice-based integrative research (2022), International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation

Yoram Reich has also authored a book titled We Are Not Users, published by The MIT Press in 2020.

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Eswaran Subrahmanian
  • Avi Shaked
  • Emilia Lavi
  • Jacob Shabi
  • Shlomi Efrati

Best Publications

  • Evaluating machine learning models for engineering problems

    Yoram Reich;S.V. Barai

  • Topological structures for modeling engineering design processes

    Dan Braha;Yoram Reich

  • Machine learning techniques for civil engineering problems

    Yoram Reich

  • Varieties and issues of participation and design

    Yoram Reich;Suresh L. Konda;Ira A. Monarch;Sean N. Levy

  • A critical review of General Design Theory

    Yoram Reich

  • Infused design. I. Theory

    Offer Shai;Yoram Reich

  • The formation and use of abstract concepts in design

    Yoram Reich;Steven J. Fenves

  • My method is better

    Yoram Reich

  • Standardization and modularization driven by minimizing overall process effort

    Yuval Sered;Yoram Reich

  • Design theory: a foundation of a new paradigm for design science and engineering

    Armand Hatchuel;Pascal Le Masson;Yoram Reich;Eswaran Subrahmanian

  • Creative conceptual design: Extending the scope by infused design

    Offer Shai;Yoram Reich;Daniel Rubin

  • A theoretical analysis of creativity methods in engineering design: casting and improving ASIT within C–K theory

    Yoram Reich;Armand Hatchuel;Offer Shai;Eswaran Subrahmanian

  • Measuring the value of knowledge

    Yoram Reich

  • Managing the Dynamics of New Product Development Processes: A New Product Lifecycle Management Paradigm

    Arie Karniel;Yoram Reich

  • A SYSTEMATIC APPROACH OF DESIGN THEORIES USING GENERATIVENESS AND ROBUSTNESS

    Armand Hatchuel;Pascal Le Masson;Yoram Reich;Benoit Weil

  • SOS – subjective objective system for generating optimal product concepts

    Amir Ziv-Av;Yoram Reich

  • Layered models of research methodologies

    Yoram Reich

  • Equations aren't enough: informal modeling in design

    Eswaran Subrahmanian;Suresh L. Konda;Sean N. Levy;Yoram Reich

  • From DSM-Based Planning to Design Process Simulation: A Review of Process Scheme Logic Verification Issues

    A. Karniel;Y. Reich

  • Building Agility for Developing Agile Design Information Systems

    Yoram Reich;Suresh Konda;Eswaran Subrahmanian;Douglas Cunningham

  • Designing the process design process

    Arthur W. Westerberg;Eswaran Subrahmainan;Yoram Reich;Suresh Konda

Frequent Co-Authors

Eswaran Subrahmanian
Eswaran Subrahmanian Carnegie Mellon University
Armand Hatchuel
Armand Hatchuel Mines ParisTech
Arthur W. Westerberg
Arthur W. Westerberg Carnegie Mellon University
Larry Leifer
Larry Leifer Stanford University
Moshe Eisenberger
Moshe Eisenberger Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Claudia Eckert
Claudia Eckert The Open University
Tyson R. Browning
Tyson R. Browning Texas Christian University
Tim C. McAloone
Tim C. McAloone Technical University of Denmark
Steven M. Smith
Steven M. Smith Texas A&M University
Nahum Travitzky
Nahum Travitzky University of Erlangen-Nuremberg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a variety of online degree options and career pathways. One advantage is flexibility—many online computer science degree programs offer accelerated formats, letting you complete your education at a pace that fits your needs.

If your academic record isn’t perfect, don’t worry. There are online schools that accept low gpa, making higher education more accessible to students with diverse backgrounds.

Exploring related fields can also lead to rewarding careers. For instance, an interest in sustainability may inspire you to consider the question: what can you do with an environmental studies degree? Options range from environmental consulting to policy and beyond.

Additionally, technical minds may be drawn to specialized programs such as the online environmental engineering degree. These programs combine technology skills with environmental problem solving, preparing you for in-demand roles in engineering and sustainability sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Yoram Reich

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles