World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
39
Citations
10321
World Ranking
9545
National Ranking
377

Bran Selic publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bran Selic sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 180 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Bran Selic D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bran Selic sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bran Selic is affiliated with Malina Software Corp. in Canada and has contributed extensively to the field of computer science, particularly in software engineering and related subfields. Their scholarly work spans a variety of topics and has been published in several recognized scientific venues.

Selic's research primarily focuses on advanced software engineering methodologies, software engineering research, business process modeling and analysis, service-oriented architecture and web services, model-driven software engineering techniques, software engineering techniques and practices, and software system performance and reliability.

Recent significant publications authored or co-authored by Selic include:

  • Specifying dynamic software system architectures, 2021, Software & Systems Modeling
  • Controlling the Controllers: What Software People Can Learn From Control Theory, 2020, IEEE Software
  • The Forgotten Interfaces: A Critique of Component-based Models of Computing, 2020, The Journal of Object Technology
  • Towards Facilitating the Exploration of Informal Concepts in Formal Modeling Tools, 2021, 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems Companion (MODELS-C)
  • Specifying and Composing Layered Architectures, 2024, The Journal of Object Technology

The venues where Selic frequently publishes are:

  • IEEE Software
  • The Journal of Object Technology
  • 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems Companion (MODELS-C)
  • Software & Systems Modeling
  • ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes

Selic often collaborates with other researchers in the field. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Manfred Broy
  • Thomas Zimmermann
  • Slimane Hammoudi
  • Luís Ferreira Pires
  • Martin Gogolla

In addition to articles, Selic has contributed to book publications. Notably, they have a work published by Springer Science+Business Media titled Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development (2021).

Bran Selic's research spans the main field of computer science, with a strong emphasis on subfields such as information systems, artificial intelligence, management information systems, software, and computer networks and communications.

Best Publications

  • Real-time object-oriented modeling

    Bran Selic;Garth Gullekson;Paul T. Ward

  • The pragmatics of model-driven development

    B. Selic

  • Using UML for Modeling complex real-time systems

    B. Selic

  • Model Driven Architecture and Ontology Development

    Dragan Gaaevic;Dragan Djuric;Vladan Devedzic;Bran Selic

  • A Systematic Approach to Domain-Specific Language Design Using UML

    B. Selic

  • A survey of fault tolerance mechanisms and checkpoint/restart implementations for high performance computing systems

    Ifeanyi P. Egwutuoha;David Levy;Bran Selic;Shiping Chen

  • ≪UML≫ 2000 — The Unified Modeling Language

    Andy Evans;Stuart Kent;Bran Selic

  • UML for Real

    Luciano Lavagno;Grant Martin;Bran Selic

  • A generic framework for modeling resources with UML

    B. Selic

  • An MDA Manifesto

    AW Brown;G Booch;S Iyengar;J Rumbaugh

  • What will it take? A view on adoption of model-based methods in practice

    Bran Selic

  • Understanding Uncertainty in Cyber-Physical Systems: A Conceptual Model

    Man Zhang;Bran Selic;Shaukat Ali;Tao Yue

  • Modeling and Analysis of Real-Time and Embedded Systems with UML and MARTE: Developing Cyber-Physical Systems

    Bran Selic;Sbastien Grard

  • Execution of UML models: a systematic review of research and practice

    Federico Ciccozzi;Ivano Malavolta;Bran Selic

  • UML for real: design of embedded real-time systems

    Luciano Lavagno;Grant Martin;Bran Selic

  • Papyrus: a UML2 tool for domain-specific language modeling

    Sébastien Gérard;Cédric Dumoulin;Patrick Tessier;Bran Selic

  • Turning clockwise: using UML in the real-time domain

    Bran Selic

  • Challenges in Combining SysML and MARTE for Model-Based Design of Embedded Systems

    Huascar Espinoza;Daniela Cancila;Bran Selic;Sébastien Gérard

  • Agile Documentation, Anyone?

    B. Selic

  • ROOM: an object-oriented methodology for developing real-time systems

    B. Selic;G. Gullekson;J. McGee;I. Engelberg

Frequent Co-Authors

David E. Levy
David E. Levy New York University
Manfred Broy
Manfred Broy Technical University of Munich
Rafael A. Calvo
Rafael A. Calvo Imperial College London
Murray Woodside
Murray Woodside Carleton University
Alan Burns
Alan Burns University of York
Radu Grosu
Radu Grosu TU Wien
Luciano Lavagno
Luciano Lavagno Polytechnic University of Turin
Philippe Kruchten
Philippe Kruchten University of British Columbia
Shaukat Ali
Shaukat Ali Simula Research Laboratory
Alan Brown
Alan Brown Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As technology evolves, many students are now looking for flexible ways to advance their expertise and career. Online programs in fields related to computer science are increasingly popular. Opting for a cheap online MBA can be a smart way to gain management skills while keeping costs down. An MBA with a technology focus can open doors to leadership roles in the tech industry.

If you’re eager to earn a postgraduate qualification quickly, look into one year online masters programs. These accelerated programs allow you to build specialized knowledge and credentials in a short span of time — perfect for professionals balancing work and study.

For those aiming for lucrative tech careers, it’s wise to consider the highest paying online degrees. Fields like data science, cybersecurity, and IT open up high-earning roles that are very much in demand.

Finally, artificial intelligence is one of the fastest-growing niches in tech. You can gain in-demand AI skills affordably by choosing one of the cheapest online master's in artificial intelligence programs. This advanced training can lead to roles in research, development, and innovation.

Best Scientists Citing Bran Selic

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles