World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Business and Management

D-Index
37
Citations
8993
World Ranking
1932
National Ranking
791

Economics and Finance

D-Index
36
Citations
8737
World Ranking
2747
National Ranking
1529

Mark W. Dirsmith publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark W. Dirsmith sits on this spectrum.

35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 115 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientists 435 publications: 1 scientists 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35 publications 436+

This scientist: 75 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

Mark W. Dirsmith D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark W. Dirsmith sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 67 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark W. Dirsmith is affiliated with Pennsylvania State University in the United States. Their academic work is positioned within this institution.

There are no recent published papers available in the source data, and no frequent co-authors or publication venues have been recorded. Additionally, no book publications or awards have been listed.

Information on the main fields of study, subfields, or the primary topics of their research has not been provided.

Because of the limited data, a detailed overview of research contributions or specific areas of expertise cannot be offered at this time.

Best Publications

  • The Calculated and the Avowed: Techniques of Discipline and Struggles Over Identity in Big Six Public Accounting Firms

    Mark A. Covaleski;Mark W. Dirsmith;James B. Heian;Sajay Samuel

  • An Institutional Perspective on the Rise, Social Transformation, and Fall of a University Budget Category.

    Mark A. Covaleski;Mark W. Dirsmith

  • An Institutional Theory Perspective on the DRG Framework, Case-Mix Accounting Systems and Health-Care Organizations

    Mark A. Covaleski;Mark W. Dirsmith;Jeffrey E. Michelman

  • The use of budgetary symbols in the political arena: An historically informed field study☆

    Mark A. Covaleski;Mark W. Dirsmith

  • Informal communications, nonformal communications and mentoring in public accounting firms

    Mark W. Dirsmith;Mark A. Covaleski

  • Managerial Accounting Research: the contributions of organizational and sociological theories

    Sajay Samuel;Mark Dirsmith

  • Coordination and Control in a Government Agency: Contingency and Institutional Theory Perspectives on GAO Audits

    Parveen P. Gupta;Mark W. Dirsmith;Timothy J. Fogarty

  • Budgeting as a means for control and loose coupling

    Mark A. Covaleski;Mark W. Dirsmith

  • The budgetary process of power and politics

    Mark A. Covaleski;Mark W. Dirsmith

  • Structure and agency in an institutionalized setting: The application and social transformation of control in the Big Six☆

    Mark W Dirsmith;James B Heian;Mark A Covaleski

  • Jurisdictional disputes over professional work: the institutionalization of the global knowledge expert☆

    Mark A. Covaleski;Mark W. Dirsmith;Larry Rittenberg

  • Dialectic tension, double reflexivity and the everyday accounting researcher: On using qualitative methods☆

    Mark A. Covaleski;Mark W. Dirsmith

  • The Effect of Network Ties on Accounting Controls in a Supply Alliance: Field Study Evidence*

    Wai Chua;Habib Mahama;Mark Dirsmith

  • Early regulatory actions by the SEC: An institutional theory perspective on the dramaturgy of political exchanges

    William E. Bealing;Mark W. Dirsmith;Timothy Fogarty

  • Materiality judgments and audit firm culture: Social-behavioral and political perspectives

    Brian W. Carpenter;Mark W. Dirsmith;Parveen P. Gupta

  • Monetized medicine: from the physical to the fiscal

    Sajay Samuel;Mark W. Dirsmith;Barbara McElroy

  • Sampling and the abstraction of knowledge in the auditing profession: An extended institutional theory perspective

    Brian Carpenter;Mark Dirsmith

  • The coupling of the symbolic and the technical in an institutionalized context : The negotiated order of the GAO's audit reporting process

    Onker N. Basu;Mark W. Dirsmith;Parveen P. Gupta

  • Organizational socialization as instrument and symbol: An extended institutional theory perspective

    Timothy J. Fogarty;Mark W. Dirsmith

  • The Organic vs. the mechanistic audit

    Mark W. Dirsmith;John P. Mcallister

  • DIALECTIC TENSION, DOUBLE REFLEXIVITY AND THE EVERYDAY ACCOUNTING RESEARCHER: ON USING...

    Mark A. Covaleski;Mark W. Dirsmith

Frequent Co-Authors

Timothy J. Fogarty
Timothy J. Fogarty Case Western Reserve University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education opens diverse options for advancing your business and management career. With the growing demand for flexible, affordable learning, many students seek the cheapest online masters to maximize their return on investment while minimizing costs.

For those interested in combining business skills with technology, enrolling in online masters in data science programs can provide advanced analytics expertise sought by today’s employers. Meanwhile, professionals aiming for executive roles may consider a phd in leadership online, which develops strategic leadership and organizational change skills.

It’s essential to choose recognized programs for long-term career benefits. Attending one of the nationally accredited colleges ensures your degree is respected by employers and qualifies for certification or further study.

Best Scientists Citing Mark W. Dirsmith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles